DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

나노기술 경쟁력 지수의 개발

Development of a Nanotechnology Competitiveness Index

  • Bae, Seoung-Hun (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Kim, Jun Hyun (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Shin, Kwang Min (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Yoon, Jin Seon (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Shin, Min Soo (Department of Business Administration, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kang, Sang Kyu (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.01
  • 심사 : 2016.08.02
  • 발행 : 2016.10.15

초록

In this study, we have developed an index suitable for determining nanotechnology competitiveness. The analytic hierarchy process is used to compared Korean nanotechnology competitiveness with nine high-ranked countries in terms of OECD GDP along with China, India, and Russia. We fund Korea to be ranked fourth among the twelve countries. Despite Korean high rank, it has some problems with regard to infrastructure and industry development. To become a leading country in nanotechnology, Korea needs to strategically invest into research capabilities for nanotechnology, support industry convergence based on nanotechnology, and increase investment into infrastructure development. The findings of this study will contribute to enhancing nanotechnology-related policies and research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cha, H. J., Lee, H. J., 2010, Evaluation of the Informatization Index Model: Based on the Validity and Reliability of the Network Readiness Index (NRI) Model, Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 13:3 141-15.
  2. Hwang, J. S., You, J. Y., 2010, Development of Broadcasting and Telecommunications Development Index(III), Korea Information Society Development Institute, Korea.
  3. ITU, 2005, Measuring Digital Opportunity, BDB-WSIS/06, ITU.
  4. ITU, 2009, Measuring the Information Society.
  5. IMF, n.d., viewed 20 April 2016, .
  6. Korea Communications Commission, 2008, Development of Broadcasting and Telecommunications Development index, Korea.
  7. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, 2013, IMD 2013 World Competitiveness Annual analysis - Science and Technology Infrastructure, KISTEP Statistical Brief, No. 7.
  8. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, 2014, IMD 2013 World Competitiveness Annual analysis - Science and Technology Infrastructure, KISTEP Statistical Brief, No. 11.
  9. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning,2009, IMD 2009 World Competitiveness Annual analysis - Science and Technology Infrastructure, KISTEP Statistical Brief.
  10. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, 2010, Parts and materials industries improve business competitiveness in-depth evaluation report 09-9, Korea.
  11. Korea Materials & Components Industry Agency, 2008, Parts and Materials Parts and Materials Industrial Competitiveness and Corporate Comprehensive Survey, Korea.
  12. Korea Materials & Components Industry Agency, 2005, Study on Gyeonggi-component Material Support Policies for Business and Industry Development, Korea.
  13. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology, 2009, Industry Sources Strategic Technology Evaluation TRL Index, Korea.
  14. Korea Institute of Marine Science&Technology Promotion, 2011, Marine Biotechnology Research Trends Report - Focusing on Research Related to Green Growth, Korea.
  15. Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering And Technology, 2009, precisely Status and R&D demand survey of nano companies, Korea.
  16. National Information Society Agency, 2012, Digital Divide Index and Survey, Korea.
  17. National Nanotechnology Policy Center., 2013, Nanotechnology Annual 2013, Korea.
  18. National Nanotechnology Policy Center., 2014, 2014 Nano Patents No 13, Korea.
  19. Nano Statistics, n.d., viewed 20 April 2016, Nano Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. .
  20. NANOWERK, n.d., viewed 20 April 2016, .
  21. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, n.d., viewed 20 April 2016, .
  22. Seong, C. M., Yeom, S. C., Gwon, G. S., 2013, Green Technology Industry Competitiveness Index Development, Science & Technology Policy Institute, Korea.
  23. Saaty, Thomas L. 2008. Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making: Why Pair wise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors - The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process, Review of the Royal Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, Series A: Mathematics (RACSAM), 102:2 251-318.
  24. Thomson Reuters, n.d., viewed 20 April 2016, .
  25. UNESCO, n.d., viewed 20 April 2016, .
  26. World Bank, n.d., viewed 20 April 2016, .
  27. WEF, 2012, The Networked Readiness Index 2012: Benchmarking ICT Progress and Impacts for the Next Decade.

피인용 문헌

  1. A cross-dimensional analysis of nanotechnology and equality: examining gender fairness and pro-poor potential in Canada’s R&D landscape vol.7, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1804293