KIEAE Journal

Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment (한국생태환경건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Community Revitalization Policy through Analysis of Urban Regeneration Cases -Focussing on the Cases of the Urban Regeneration in the UK, Germany and Korea-

도시재생 사례분석을 통한 커뮤니티 활성화 정책에 관한 연구 -영국·독일·한국의 도시재생 사례를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2016.09.30
  • Accepted : 2016.10.23
  • Published : 2016.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose : This research aims to present policy plans for community vitality in the field of the urban regeneration project by analyzing aspects for vitality via domestic and abroad city policies and cases. Methods: The research method works as follows: The first step is 1) to introduce the concept of evaluation matrix to analyze cases of urban generation, 2) to apply to the proposed evaluation matrix, and then 3) to analyze communities' decline diagnosis, counterstrategies, and promotion process. And the second step is to draw features and evaluation of cases and to present the policy plan for communities' vitality with the urban regeneration project in South Korea via a comprehensive analysis. Result : This research confirmed the fact that when different sectors is expanded toward a mutual cooperation, communities are vitalized, having a mutual effect on other related sectors by taking a part in the community positively. Especially in the base of each characteristic and estimation, when various activities and socio-economic programs with residents are promoted in the integrated system, communities are successful. Through this results we present four policy plans for community vitality of the urban regeneration project in South Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토교통부, 국가도시재생기본방침 수립을 위한 연구, 2015.05 // (MOLIT, Research for establishing the National Urban Renewal basic policies, 2015.05)
  2. 김혜천, 한국적 도시재생의 개념과 유형, 정책방향에 관한 연구, 도시행정학보, 제26집 제3호, 2013.9 // (Kim hey cheon, Study on the concepts and types of Korean urban regeneration policy direction, Journal of KUMA, 26(3), 2013.9)
  3. 박진수, 김기수, 공공성 측면에서 본 현행 도시재생정책 및 제도에 관한 비판적 고찰, 한국도시설계학회지, 제14권 제2호, 2014.4 // (Park, jin-soo, Kim, ki-soo, A Critical Review of Current Policy and Legal System of the Urban Regeneration in Term of the Publicness, Journal of UDIK, 14(2), 2014.4)
  4. 양도식, 영국의 도시재생의 유형별 성공사례분석, 서울시정개발연구원 2007-PR-36, 2008.04 // (Yang, do-sik, Analysis by type of success in the British Urban Regeneration, Journal of The Seoul Institute, 2007-PR-36, 2008.04)
  5. 한지형, 홍상훈, 김지엽, 통합적 도시재생 프로젝트의 계획 특성에 관한 연구,-독일 코트부스 작센도르프-마들로 지역을 중심으로-, 대한건축학회연합논문집, 16권 1호(통권59호), 2014.2 // Han, Ji-Houng, Hong, Sang-Hoon, Kim, Jee-Yeop, A Study on the Planning Characteristics of the Integrated Urban Regeneration Project-Focused on the Sachendorf-Madlow District, Cottbus in germany-Journal of AIK, 16(1), 2014.2)
  6. 김현주, 독일도시재생프로그램 'Soziale Stadt'의 특성 연구,-지역자산을 활용하는 지속가능한 통합적 도시재생-, 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 제28권 제10호(통권288호), 2012.10 // (Kim, Hyun-ju, A Study on Characteristic of 'Soziale Stadt' in Germany-sustainable Intergrative Urban Regneration using of District Assets-Journal of AIK, 28(10), 2012.10)
  7. 유순선, 박철수, 지속전환개념으로 본 독일 베를린 도시재생프로그램 Stadtumbaus 특성 연구, 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 제28권 제5호(통권283호), 2012.5 // (Yoo, Soon-Seon, Park, Cheol-Soo, A Study on the Stadtumbau in Berlin as Concept for Substainable Convertion, Journal of AIK, 28(5), 2012.5)
  8. 이광국, 임정민, 선진국의 도시재생 흐름 고찰과 시사점-미국, 영국, 프랑스, 독일 일본의 법제도를 중심으로-, 대한국토.도시계획학회지 국토계획, 제48권 제6호, 2013.11 // (Lee, Kwang-Kug, Lim, Jung-Min, A Study on the Urban Regeneration Trend and Relevant Law System in Advanced Countries Abroad-Focusing on the U.S.A, the UK, France, Germany and Japan-, Journal of KPA, 48(6), 2013.11)
  9. 이명훈, 김수연, 조미정, 황지욱, 한.일도시재생 특별법 비교를 통한 개선방안 연구, 대한국토.도시계획학회지 국토계획, 제48권 제6호, 2013.11 // Lee Myeong-Hun, Kim Su-Jeong, Hwang Jee-Wook, An Improvement Direction of Regeneration Special Act through Compairison between Korea and Japan, ournal of KPA, 48(6), 2013.11)
  10. 이종근, 이삼수, 김아현, 지자체 도시재생사업의 평가방안 연구 : 도시재생선도사업을 사례로, 한국주거학회 2014 추계학술발표대회 논문집, 제26권 제2호, 2014.11 // Lee Jong-Kun, Lee Sam-Su, Kim AHyun, A Study on the Monitoring and Evaluation of Priority Projects for Urban Regeneration, Journal of KHA, 26(2), 2014.11
  11. 이규인, 이창욱, 지속가능한 도시재생의 추진전략수립연구, 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 제26권 제3호(통권257호), 2010.3 // A Study for the Promote Strategy Urban Regeneration-Focussing on Cases of the Experts and Residents at the National Capital Region-Journal of AIK, 26(3), 2010.3)
  12. 이상훈, 황지욱, 도시재생의 정책 배경과 패러다임 전환, 대한국토.도시계획학회 국토계획, 제48권 제6호, 2013.11 // (Lee, Sang-Hoon, Hwang, Jeeook, Urban Regeneration, its Political Background and New Paradigm Shift, Journal of KPA, 48(6), 2013.11)
  13. 서수정, 지속가능한 개발과 뉴어바니즘 이론의 적용에 의한 영국 버밍험시 도시재생의 특성, 대한국토.도시계획학회지 국토계획, 제42권 제7호, 2007.12 // Seo, Soo-jeong, The Characteristics of Regeneration in Birmingham-Emerging Concept of Sustainable Development and New Urbanism-, Journal of KPA, 42(7), 2007.12)
  14. London Docklands Development Corporation:Current Land Use(1977) Studies, Vol.36, No5.
  15. Gripaios, P., The Failure of Regeneration Policy in Britain, Regional 2002.
  16. Andrew Tallon, Urban Regeneration In The Uk, Routledge, 2010.
  17. Robert, P. and Sykes, H., Urban Regeneration : A Handbook, Lond;SAGE, (2005)
  18. http://www.northmoorhomezone.org
  19. http://www.staedtebaufoerderung.info
  20. http://www.kourc.or.kr
  21. 그 외 사례 대상 도시 홈페이지 및 추진조직 홈페이지

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Shared-Use School Facilities Linked to Urban Regeneration vol.7, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.30902/jrea.2021.7.3.227