Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 38
  • /
  • Pages.42.1-42.7
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective clinical study of an implant with a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched surface and internal connection: analysis of short-term success rate and marginal bone loss

  • Lee, Jae-Wang (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • An, Jun Hyeong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Chong, Jong-Hyon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Gwang-Seok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Han, JeongJoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Seunggon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kook, Min-suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Ryu, Sun-Youl (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2016.08.03
  • Accepted : 2016.09.29
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical utility of an implant with a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface and internal connection. Methods: Six patients who received dental implants in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chonnam National University Dental Hospital, were analyzed by factors influencing the success rate and marginal bone loss. Factors included patient's age, sex, implant installation site, whether bone graft was done, type of bone graft materials, approaching method if sinus lift was done, and the size of the fixture. In addition, the marginal bone loss was analyzed by using a radiograph. Results: All implants were successful, and the cumulative survival rate was 100 %. Average marginal bone loss of 6 months after the installation was 0.52 mm and 20 months after the functional loading was 1.06 mm. Total marginal bone resorption was 1.58 mm on average. There was no statistically significant difference in mesial and distal marginal bone loss. Conclusions: The short-term clinical success rate of the implant with an SLA surface and internal connection was satisfactory. Moreover, the marginal bone loss was also consistent with the implant success criteria.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim SK, Kim JH, Lee KW, Cho KS, Han DH (2011) Success rate and marginal bone loss of Osstem USII plus implants: short term clinical study. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 49:206-213 https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.3.206
  2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI (1981) A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  3. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP (1997) Long-term evaluation of nonsubmerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 8:161-172 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  4. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, Feldmann G, Freiberg N, Glantz PO, Kjellman O et al (1988) Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 59:287-296 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287
  5. Becker W, Becker BE, Alsuwyed A, Al-Mubarak S (1999) Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: a prospective study. J Periodontol 70:896-901 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.8.896
  6. Bahat O (2000) Branemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:646-653
  7. Jang MJ, Yun PY, Kin YK (2013) Retrospective clinical study of new tapered design implants in maxillary posterior areas. ORAL BIOLOGY RESEARCH 37(2):105-111 https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.37.2.201310.105
  8. Fanuscu MI, Chang TL, Akca K (2007) Effect of surgical techniques on primary implant stability and peri-implant bone. J Oral Maxilloface Surg 65:2487-2491 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.017
  9. Choi SJ, Yoo JH, Lee KB, Kim JW (2012) The success rate of Mg-incorporated oxidized implants in partially edentulous patients: a prospective clinical study. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 50:176-183 https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.3.176
  10. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, LindstromJ, HallenO, Ohman A (1977) Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 16:1-132.
  11. Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (1985) Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. JPD 54(4):611-612
  12. Albrektsson TO, Johansson CB, Sennerby L (2000) Biological aspects of implant dentistry: osseointegration. Periodontol 4:58-73
  13. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (1991) Osseointegration: a requiem for the periodontal ligament? Int J Periodont Res Dent 11:88-91
  14. Huang HM, Pan LC, Lee SY, Chiu CL, Fan KH HOKN (2000) Assessing the implant/bone interface by using natural frequency analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 90:285-291 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.108918
  15. Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL (2003) Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:641-651
  16. Boronat-Lopez A, Pdnarrocha-Diago M, Martinez-Cortissoz O, Minguez-Martinez I (2006) Resonance frequency analysis after the placement of 133 dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 11:E272-E276
  17. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T (1988) Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3:21-24
  18. Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Hjorting-Hansen E, Jensen JS, Holmen A (1992) Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 3:77-84 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030205.x
  19. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A (2000) Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:668-674
  20. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A (1997) Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit Clin Oral Implants Res 8:442-447 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080601.x
  21. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ (1995) A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 6:24-30 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
  22. Ferguson SJ, Langhoff JD, Voelter K, von Rechenberg B, Scharnweber D, Bierbaum S, Schnabelrauch M, Kautz AR, Frauchiger VM, Mueller TL, van Lenthe GH, Schlottig F (2008) Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:1037-1046
  23. Kim SG, Oh MS, Kim YK, Oh HK, Choi GL, Oh YH (2007) Multicenter retrospective clinical study of Osstem USII implant system in complete edentulous patients. Implantology 11:12-21
  24. Arlin M (2007) Survival and success of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a retrospective study. J Canadian Dent Asso 73:821-827
  25. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H (1991) Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25(7):889-902 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  26. Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Higginbottom FL, Hermann JS, Makins SR, Buser D (1996) Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 7(3):240-252 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070306.x
  27. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D (1998) Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 40(1):1-11 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q
  28. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP et al (1999) Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 45(2):75-83 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2<75::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P
  29. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR (1986) The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1(1):11-25
  30. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP et al (2002) The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 13(2):144-153 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  31. Hong JY, Chae GJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Cho KS, Chae JK, Chon KK, Choi SH (2007) Retrospective studies of dental implant placement at each intraoral site and situation. J Korean Acad Periodont 37(4):805-824 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2007.37.4.805
  32. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP (1990) Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1(1):33-40 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x
  33. Buser D, Janner S, Wittneben JG, Bragger U, Ramseier C, Salvi G (2012) 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14:839-851 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x
  34. Behneke A, Behneke N, d'Hoedt B (2000) The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:633-645
  35. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Dula K, Lang NP (1999) Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res 13:153-161 https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374990130010501
  36. Kim YK, Yun PY, Son DI, Kim BS, Hwang JW (2006) Analysis of clinical application of Osstem(R) (Korea) implant system for 6 years. Implantology 10:56-65
  37. Wyatt C, Zarb G (2002) Bone level changes proximal to oral implants supporting fixed partial prostheses. Clin Oral Impl Res 13:162-168 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130206.x
  38. Elkhaweldi A, Lee DH, Wang W, Cho SC (2014) The survival rate of RBM surface versus SLA surface in geometrically identical implant design. J Oral Bio 1(1):8-15
  39. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL (2005) Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20:569-577
  40. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, vanSteenberghe D (2002) Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:381-389 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130406.x
  41. Weber HP, Crohin CC, Fiorellini JP (2000) A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 11:144-153 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.110207.x
  42. Mombelli A, Cionca N (2006) Systemic diseases affecting osseointegration therapy. Clin Oral Imp Res 17(2):97-103 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01354.x

Cited by

  1. Bone regeneration is associated with the concentration of tumour necrosis factor-α induced by sericin released from a silk mat vol.7, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15687-w
  2. Recent advances in dental implants vol.39, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-017-0132-2
  3. The effect of fixation plate use on bone healing during the reconstruction of mandibular defects vol.45, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.5.276