DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analytical fragility curves of a structure subject to tsunami waves using smooth particle hydrodynamics

  • Sihombing, Fritz (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST)) ;
  • Torbol, Marco (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST))
  • Received : 2015.09.16
  • Accepted : 2016.08.23
  • Published : 2016.12.25

Abstract

This study presents a new method to computes analytical fragility curves of a structure subject to tsunami waves. The method uses dynamic analysis at each stage of the computation. First, the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) model simulates the propagation of the tsunami waves from shallow water to their impact on the target structure. The advantage of SPH over mesh based methods is its capability to model wave surface interaction when large deformations are involved, such as the impact of water on a structure. Although SPH is computationally more expensive than mesh based method, nowadays the advent of parallel computing on general purpose graphic processing unit overcome this limitation. Then, the impact force is applied to a finite element model of the structure and its dynamic non-linear response is computed. When a data-set of tsunami waves is used analytical fragility curves can be computed. This study proves it is possible to obtain the response of a structure to a tsunami wave using state of the art dynamic models in every stage of the computation at an affordable cost.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST)

References

  1. Altomare, C., Crespo, A.J.C., Domínguez, J.M., Gomez-Gesteira, M., Suzuki, T. and Verwaest, T. (2015), "Applicability of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for estimation of sea wave impact on coastal structures", Coast. Eng., 96, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.11.001
  2. Altomare, C., Crespo, A.J.C., Rogers, B.D., Dominguez, J.M., Gironella, X. and Gomez-Gesteira, M. (2014), "Numerical modelling of armour block sea breakwater with smoothed particle hydrodynamics", Comput. Struct., 130, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.10.011
  3. Arnason, H. (2005), Interactions between an Incident Bore and a Free-Standing Coastal Structure, University of Washington, Ph.D Thesis.
  4. Barreiro, A., Crespo, A.J.C., Dominguez, J.M. and Gomez-Gesteira, M. (2013), "Smoothed particle hydrodynamics for coastal engineering problems", Comput. Struct., 120, 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.02.010
  5. Borrero, J.C. (2005), "Field data and satellite imagery of Tsunami effects in banda aceh", Science, 308(5728), 1596-1596. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110957
  6. Crespo, A.J.C., Dominguez, J.M., Rogers, B.D., Gomez-Gesteira, M., Longshaw, S., Canelas, R., Vacondio, R., Barreiro, A. and Garcia-Feal, O. (2015), "Dualsphysics: Open-source parallel Cfd solver based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics (Sph)", Comput. Phys.Commun., 187, 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.10.004
  7. Dao, M.H., Xu, H., Chan, E.S. and Tkalich, P. (2013), "Modelling of Tsunami-like wave run-up, breaking and impact on a vertical wall by Sph method", Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13(12), 3457-3467. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3457-2013
  8. Dutta, A. and Mander, J. (2001), Rapid and Detailed Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges, Unpublished Technical Report MCEER.
  9. FEMA (2008), Guidelines for Design of Structures for Vertical Evacuation from Tsunamis (Fema P646), Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  10. Filippou, F.C., Popov, E.P. and Bertero, V.V. (1983), Effects of Bond Deterioration on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Joints.
  11. Gingold, R.A. and Monaghan, J.J. (1977), "Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars", MNRAS, 181(3), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/181.3.375
  12. Gisler, G., Weaver, R.P. and Gittings, M. (2010), Calculations of Tsunamis from Submarine Landslides, Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences, Springer, 695-704.
  13. Gomez-Gesteira, M., Rogers, B.D., Crespo, A.J.C., Dalrymple, R.A., Narayanaswamy, M. and Dominguez, J.M. (2012), "Sphysics - development of a free-surface fluid solver - Part 1: theory and formulations", Comput. Geosci., 48, 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.029
  14. Goto, C., Ogawa, Y., Shuto, N. and Imamura, F. (1997), Iugg/Ioc Time Project: Numerical Method of Tsunami Simulation with the Leap-Frog Scheme, Unesco.
  15. Hill, E.M., Borrero, J.C., Huang, Z., Qiu, Q., Banerjee, P., Natawidjaja, D.H., Elosegui, P., Fritz, H.M., Suwargadi, B.W., Pranantyo, I.R., Li, L., Macpherson, K.A., Skanavis, V., Synolakis, C.E. and Sieh, K. (2012), "The 2010 Mw 7.8 mentawai earthquake: Very shallow source of a rare Tsunami earthquake determined from Tsunami field survey and near-field Gps data", J. Geophys. Res., 117(6), 1-21.
  16. Horbitz, C.B., Lovholt, F., Pedersen, G. and Masson, D.G. (2006), "Mechanisms of Tsunami generation by submarine landslides: A short review", Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 86(3), 255-264.
  17. Joseph, A. (2011), Tsunamis: Detection, Monitoring, and Early-Warning Technologies, Academic Press.
  18. Kim, S.H. and Feng, M.Q. (2003), "Fragility analysis of bridges under ground motion with spatial variation", Int. J. Nonlinear Mech., 38(5), 705-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00128-7
  19. Koshimura, S., Namegaya, Y. and Yanagisawa, H. (2009), "Tsunami fragility - a new measure to identify Tsunami damage", J. Disaster Res., 4(6), 479-488. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2009.p0479
  20. McKenna, F. (2011), "Opensees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation", Comput. Sci. Eng., 13(4), 58-66.
  21. Mohammed, F. and Fritz, H.M. (2010), "Experiments on Tsunamis generated by 3d granular landslides", Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences, Springer, 705-718.
  22. Mori, N., Takahashi, T., Yasuda, T. and Yanagisawa, H. (2011), "Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake Tsunami inundation and run-up: Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake Tsunami", Geophys. Res. Lett., 38(7), 1-6.
  23. National Tsunami Warning, C. (2014), Physics of Tsunamis.
  24. Neuenhofer, A. and Filippou, F.C. (1997), "Evaluation of nonlinear frame finite-element models", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 123(7), 958-966. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:7(958)
  25. Palermo, D., Nistor, I., Nouri, Y. and Cornett, A. (2009), "Tsunami loading of near-shoreline structures: A primer", Can. J. Civil Eng., 36(11), 1804-1815. https://doi.org/10.1139/L09-104
  26. Priestley, M.J.N. (1996), Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Ramsden, J. (1996), "Forces on a vertical wall due to long waves, bores, and dry-bed surges", J. Waterw. Port C.- ASCE, 122(3), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1996)122:3(134)
  28. Schultz, M.T., Gouldby, B.P., Simm, J.D. and Wibowo, J.L. (2010), Beyond the Factor of Safety:Developing Fragility Curves to Characterize System Reliability, DTIC Document
  29. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M.Q., Lee, J. and Naganuma, T. (2000), "Statistical analysis of fragility curves", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 126(12), 1224-1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)
  30. Spacone, E., Filippou, F.C. and Ciampi, V. (1992), A Beam Element for Seismic Damage Analysis, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, Calif.
  31. St-Germain, P., Nistor, I. and Townsend, R. (2012), "Numerical modeling of the impact with Structures of Tsunami bores propagating on dry and wet beds using the Sph method", Int. J. Protective Structures, 3(2), 221-256. https://doi.org/10.1260/2041-4196.3.2.221
  32. St-Germain, P., Nistor, I., Townsend, R. and Shibayama, T. (2014), "Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics numerical modeling of structures impacted by Tsunami bores", J. Waterw. Port C.- ASCE, 140(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000225
  33. Taucer, F., Spacone, E., University of California, B.E.E.R.C. and Filippou, F.C. (1991), A Fiber Beam-Column Element for Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California.
  34. Titov, V. and Gonzalez, F. (1997), Implementation and Testing of the Method of Splitting Tsunami (Most) Model, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Research Laboratories, Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory.
  35. Torbol, M., Gomez, H. and Feng, M. (2013), "Fragility analysis of highway bridges based on long-term monitoring data", Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. E., 28(3), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00805.x
  36. Wang, X. and Liu, P.L.F. (2006), "An analysis of 2004 Sumatra earthquake fault plane mechanisms and Indian Ocean Tsunami", J. Hydraulic Res., 44(2), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2006.9521671
  37. Yassin, M.H.M. (1994), Nonlinear Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Structures under Monotonic and Cyclic Loads, University of California, Berkeley.
  38. Yeh, H. (2007), "Design Tsunami forces for onshore structures", J. Disaster Res., 2(6), 531-536. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2007.p0531

Cited by

  1. Parallel fault tree analysis for accurate reliability of complex systems vol.72, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.12.003
  2. Non-stochastic uncertainty response assessment method of beam and laminated plate using interval finite element analysis vol.26, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.26.3.311