The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the bonding strengths of second- and third-generation light-emitting diode light-curing units

  • Lee, Hee-Min (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Cheol (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Hwa (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Chang, Na-Young (Department of Orthodontics, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital)
  • Received : 2015.09.23
  • Accepted : 2016.01.19
  • Published : 2016.11.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: With the introduction of third-generation light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in dental practice, it is necessary to compare their bracket-bonding effects, safety, and efficacy with those of the second-generation units. Methods: In this study, 80 extracted human premolars were randomly divided into eight groups of 10 samples each. Metal or polycrystalline ceramic brackets were bonded on the teeth using second- or third-generation LED light-curing units (LCUs), according to the manufacturers' instructions. The shear bond strengths were measured using the universal testing machine, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was scored by assessing the residual resin on the surfaces of debonded teeth using a scanning electron microscope. In addition, curing times were also measured. Results: The shear bond strengths in all experimental groups were higher than the acceptable clinical shear bond strengths, regardless of the curing unit used. In both LED LCU groups, all ceramic bracket groups showed significantly higher shear bond strengths than did the metal bracket groups except the plasma emulation group which showed no significant difference. When comparing units within the same bracket type, no differences in shear bond strength were observed between the second- and third-generation unit groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed among the groups for the ARI. Conclusions: The bracket-bonding effects and ARIs of second- and third-generation LED LCUs showed few differences, and most were without statistical significance; however, the curing time was shorter for the second-generation unit.

Keywords

References

  1. Flury S, Lussi A, Hickel R, Ilie N. Light curing through glass ceramics with a second- and a third-generation LED curing unit: effect of curing mode on the degree of conversion of dual-curing resin cements. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:2127-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0924-4
  2. Price RB, Felix CM, Whalen JM. Factors affecting the energy delivered to simulated class I and class v preparations. J Can Dent Assoc 2010;76:a94.
  3. Dall'Igna CM, Marchioro EM, Spohr AM, Mota EG. Effect of curing time on the bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or plasma arc light. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:55-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq027
  4. Swanson T, Dunn WJ, Childers DE, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with light-emitting diode curing units at various polymerization times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:337-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.011
  5. Rueggeberg FA. State-of-the-art: dental photocuring--a review. Dent Mater 2011;27:39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.021
  6. Lee JH, Lee M, Kim KN, Hwang CJ. Resin bonding of metal brackets to glazed zirconia with a porcelain primer. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:299-307. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.6.299
  7. Lee JY, Kim JS, Hwang CJ. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using various zirconia primers. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:164-70. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.4.164
  8. Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology. Br Dent J 1999;186:388-91.
  9. Uhl A, Sigusch BW, Jandt KD. Second generation LEDs for the polymerization of oral biomaterials. Dent Mater 2004;20:80-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00095-2
  10. Flury S, Lussi A, Hickel R, Ilie N. Light curing through glass ceramics: effect of curing mode on micromechanical properties of dual-curing resin cements. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:809-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1051-y
  11. Spranley TJ, Winkler M, Dagate J, Oncale D, Strother E. Curing light burns. Gen Dent 2012;60:e210-4.
  12. Bruzell Roll EM, Jacobsen N, Hensten-Pettersen A. Health hazards associated with curing light in the dental clinic. Clin Oral Investig 2004;8:113-7.
  13. Jandt KD, Mills RW. A brief history of LED photopolymerization. Dent Mater 2013;29:605-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.02.003
  14. Malkoc S, Uysal T, Usumez S, Isman E, Baysal A. In-vitro assessment of temperature rise in the pulp during orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:379-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.028
  15. Cha JY, Lee KJ, Park SH, Kim TW, Yu HS. Comarison of the shear bond strength of brackets in regards to the light curing source. Korean J Orthod 2006;36:198-206.
  16. Mavropoulos A, Cattani-Lorente M, Krejci I, Staudt CB. Kinetics of light-cure bracket bonding: power density vs exposure duration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:543-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.068
  17. Kang J, Jun S, Kim J, Kim J, Yoo S. Evaluation of new LED curing light on resin composite polymerization. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2014;41:152-6. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2014.41.2.152
  18. Kwon TH, Kang JM, Chang NY, Kang KH. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded with antimicrobial monomer-containing self-etching primer. Korean J Orthod 2011;41:16-24. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2011.41.1.16
  19. Judy RH, Dunn WJ, Patel AB, Swanson T. Effective single-charge end point of cordless light-emitting diode light-curing units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:378-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.017
  20. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 11405: 2003(E). Dentistry: Dental materials: testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
  21. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8
  22. Wiggins KM, Hartung M, Althoff O, Wastian C, Mitra SB. Curing performance of a new-generation light-emitting diode dental curing unit. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1471-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0059
  23. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666
  24. Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A. A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:610-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr044
  25. Reddy YG, Sharma R, Singh A, Agrawal V, Agrawal V, Chaturvedi S. The shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets: An in-vitro comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:1495-7.
  26. Eliades T, Johnston WM, Eliades G. Direct light transmittance through ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:11-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70152-4
  27. Graber TM, Eliades T, Athanasiou AE. Risk management in orthodontics: Experts' guide to malpractice. Surrey, UK: Quintessence Books; 2004. p. 25.
  28. Bishara SE, Fehr DE. Ceramic brackets: something old, something new, a review. Semin Orthod 1997;3:178-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(97)80068-0

Cited by

  1. Effect of different bonding protocols on degree of monomer conversion and bond strength between orthodontic brackets and enamel vol.32, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0058
  2. Influence of radiant exposure values from two third generation LED curing units on polymerization profile and microhardness of orthodontic composite under ceramic and metallic brackets vol.26, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.1.e2119150.oar
  3. Comparative study of three composite materials in bonding attachments for clear aligners vol.24, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12465