Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation (재활치료과학)

Korean Society of Neurological Occupational Therapy (대한신경계작업치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review on Accelerometer to Measure Activity of Daily Living of Patients with Stroke

뇌졸중 환자의 일상생활활동 평가도구인 가속도계에 대한 체계적 고찰

  • Lee, Joo-Hyun (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Jin-Hyuck (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Yeonju (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Hae Yean (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Hyuk (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Yonsei University)
  • 이주현 (연세대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박진혁 (연세대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김연주 (연세대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박혜연 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박지혁 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2016.07.15
  • Accepted : 2015.08.08
  • Published : 2016.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the articles using accelerometer to measure activity of daily living of patients with stroke. Methods: Depending on selection criteria, 13 studies were searched for PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library database from February 2014 to March 2014. A total of 331 papers were searched, and 13 of these were selected. Results: In studies of 13 selected, acute, subacute, and chronic patients with stroke were enrolled. The kind of accelerometer was uniaxial, biaxial, and triaxial, activity monitor. Measurement activities were mainly arm activity, walking activity, and attachment sites were also various depending on the measurement activities. A measured variable was the total number of activities, the movement speed of the patients, ratio between affected and non-affected, and motion analysis. The result indicated that significant correlation with the other assessment tools in all studies. Conclusions: Accelerometer will be applied with a tool for measuring activity of daily living of patients with stroke, depending on activities characteristics. Further, we need accelerometer studies to apply with a variety of assessment in clinical practice or community settings.

목적: 본 연구는 뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로 사용한 가속도계 연구를 고찰하여 뇌졸중 환자의 일상생활활동평가 도구로 가속도계가 유용하게 활용될 수 있는 지 알아보고자 하였다. 연구방법: 2014년 2월부터 3월까지 PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library 데이터베이스를 통해 제공되는 논문들을 수집하였다. 총 331 개의 연구가 검색되었으며 최종 13개의 논문을 선정하였다 결과: 선정된 13편의 연구에서는 급성기, 아급성기, 만성기의 뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 평가에 사용한 가속도계의 종류로는 단축, 이축, 삼축 가속도계, 활동모니터가 있었으며, 20Hz 미만 혹은 이상의 진동수를 설정하고 1개에서 3개 이상을 사용하였다. 또한 가속도계는 일상생활의 상지 및 하지활동 및 움직임을 측정하기 위해서 사용되었으며, 일상생활의 상지 과제를 통해 움직임을 분석할 때는 주로 손목, 팔에, 하지의 움직임은 허리, 넓적다리, 복사뼈에 부착하여 분석하였다. 측정활동은 주로 상지과제 활동, 걷기 활동 이였으며, 측정활동에 따라 부착부위도 다양하였다. 측정변수로는 총 활동 수, 대상자 움직임의 속도, 양측 움직임 비율, 동작분석이 있었으며, 결과로는 모든 연구에서 중재 전, 후 가속도계로 측정한 변수와 기존의 다른 평가도구와의 유의한 상관관계를 보고하였다. 결론: 본 연구를 통해 작업치료사가 뇌졸중 환자의 일상생활활동을 객관적으로 평가할 때 가속도계가 유용하게 활용될 수 있다는 것을 증명하였다. 더 나아가 국내 작업치료 연구를 통해 가속도계가 임상 및 지역사회에서 다양한 방법으로 활용될 수 있기를 기대해 본다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이정호, 이기광. (2011). 가속도계를 활용한 신체활동 측정에 있어 국내외 연구현황에 대한 고찰. 스포츠과학연구소논총, 29, 41-51.
  2. Arbesman, M., Scheer, J., & Lieberman, D. (2008). Using AOTA's critically appraised topic(CAT) and critically appraised paper(CAP) series to link evidence to practice. Occupational Therapy Practice, 13(5), 18-22.
  3. Akay, M., Sekine, M., Tamura, T., Hisgashi, Y., & Fujimoto, T. (2004). Fractal dynamics of body motion in post-stroke hemiplegic patients during walking. Journal of Neural Engineering, 1(2), 111-116. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/1/2/006
  4. Brown, T., Mapleston, J., Nairn, A., & Molloy, A. (2013). Relationship of cognitive and perceptual abilities to functional independence in adults who have had a stroke. Occupational Therapy International, 20(1), 11-22. doi: 10.1002/oti.1334
  5. Cheung, V. H., Gray, L., & Karunanithi, M. (2011). Review of accelerometry for determining daily activity among elderly patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(6), 998-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.040
  6. Fisher, A. G. (2003). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (5th ed.). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
  7. Fulk, G. D., Reynolds, C., Mondal, S., & Deutsch, J. E. (2010). Predicting home and community walking activity in people with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(10), 1582-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.005
  8. Gebruers, N., Vanroy, C., Truijen, S., Engelborghs, S., & De Deyn, P. P. (2010). Monitoring of physical activity after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(2), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.025
  9. Green. (2007). Assessment of habitual physical activity and paretic arm mobility among stroke survivors by accelerometry. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 14(6), 9-21. doi: 10.1310/tsr1406-9
  10. Hale, L. A., Pal, J., & Becker, I. (2008). Measuring free-living physical activity in adults with and without neurologic dysfunction with a triaxial accelerometer. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(9), 1765-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.027
  11. Jung, H. Y., Kim, K. M., & Chang, M. Y. (2009). Measurement tools for occupational therapy for stroke patients: A systematic review. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 17(3), 79-95.
  12. Kang, S. I., Cho, J. S., Lim, D. H., Lee., J. S., & Kim, Y. I. (2013). Implementation of motion analysis system based on inertial measurement units for rehabilitation purposes. Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of Korea, 7(2), 47-54.
  13. Kim, T. H. (2015). Kinematics of bimanual complementary movement in stroke patients. The Korea Contents Society, 15(4), 342-349.
  14. Lang, C. E., Wagner, J. M., Edwards, D. F., & Dromerick, A. W. (2007). Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 31(2), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e31806748bd
  15. Lee, M. Y. (2011). Validity evidences and validation procedures of objective physical activity measures. The korean journal of measurement and evaluation in physical education and sport science, 13(2), 17-37.
  16. Lim, K. B., & Kim, J. A. (2013). Activity of daily living and motor evoked potentials in the subacute stroke patients. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(1), 82-87. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.82
  17. Lord, S. E., Rochester, L., Weatherall, M., McPherson, K. M., & McNaughton, H. K. (2006). The effect of environment and task on gait parameters after stroke: A randomized comparison of measurement conditions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(7), 967-973. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.03.003
  18. Michielsen, M. E., Selles, R. W., Stam, H. J., Ribbers, G. M., & Bussmann, J. B. (2012). Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: A study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(11), 1975-1981. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.016
  19. Namkung, Y., Lee, H. S., & Chang, K. Y. (1996). The correlation of functional independence measure(FIM) and 5 scale modified barthel index(MBI) in patient with CVA. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 4(1), 45-50.
  20. Noorkoiv, M., Rodgers, H., & Price, C. I. (2014). Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: A systematic review of clinical studies. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 11(1), 144-154. doi:1186/1743-0003-11-144 https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-144
  21. Ortlieb, S., Dias, A., Gorzelniak, L., Nowak, D., Karrasch, S., Peters, A., ... & Schulz, H. (2014). Exploring patterns of accelerometry-assessed physical activity in elderly people. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(28), 1-10. doi: 10.1186 /1479-5868-11-28 https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-1
  22. Ozemek, C., Kirschner, M. M., Wilkerson, B. S., Byun, W., & Kaminsky, L. A. (2014). Intermonitor reliability of the GT3X+ accelerometer at hip, wrist and ankle sites during activitiies of daily living. Physiological Measurement, 35(2), 129-138. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/2/129
  23. Park, S. J., & Bae, S. Y. (2012). The effects of task-oriented activities on ADL performance, balance and satisfaction in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 20(2), 1-11.
  24. Plasqui, G., Bonomi, A. G., & Westerterp, K. R. (2013). Daily physical activity assessment with accelerometers: New insights and validation studies. Obesity, 14(6), 451-462. doi:10.1111/obr.12021
  25. Prajapati, S. K., Gage, W. H., Brooks, D., Black, S. E. & Mcllroy, W. E. (2011). A novel approach to ambulatory monitoring: Investigation into the quantity and control of everyday walking in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25(1), 6-14. doi:10.1177/1545968310374189
  26. Rand, D., & Eng, J. J. (2012). Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26(1), 76-84. doi: 10.1177/1545968311408918
  27. Rand, D., Eng, J. J., Tang, P. F., Hung, C., & Jeng, J. S. (2010). Daily physical activity and its contribution to the health-related quality of life of ambulatory individuals with chronic stroke. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8(1), 80. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-80
  28. Rand, D., Givon, N., Weingarden, H., Nota, A., & Zeilig, G. (2014). Eliciting upper extremity purposeful movements using video games: A comparison with traditional therapy for stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28(8), 733-739. doi:10.1177/1545968314521008
  29. Radomski, M. V., & Latham, C. A. T. (Eds.). (2010). Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  30. Reiterer, V., Sauter, C., Klosch, G., Lalouschek, W., & Zeitlhofer, J. (2008). Actigraphy-a useful tool for motor activity monitoring in stroke patients. European Neurology, 60(6), 285-291. doi:10.1159/000157882
  31. Song, C. S. (2012). Current trends and future oriented view of clinical measurement used by neurological occupational therapist. The Korea Academia Industrial Cooperation Society, 13(11), 5229-5237. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.11.5229
  32. Thrane, G., Emaus, N., Askim, T., & Anke, A. (2011). Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: Association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43(4), 299-304. doi:10.2340/16501977-0676
  33. Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Morris, D., Vignolo, M., & McCulloch, K. (2005). Reliability and validity of the upper extremity motor activity log-14 for measuring rela world arm use. Stroke, 36(11), 2493-2496. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e
  34. Uswatte, G., Foo, W. L., Olmstead, H., Lopez, K., Holand, A., & Simms, L. B. (2005). Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: An objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(7), 1498-1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.010
  35. Uswatte, G., Giuliani, C., Winstein, C., Zeringue, A., Hobbs, L., & Wolf, S. L. (2006). Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: Evidence from the extremity constraintinduced therapy evaluation trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(10), 1340-1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.006
  36. Uswatte, G., Miltner, W. H. R., Foo, B., Varma, M., Moran, S., & Taub, E. (2000). Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke, 31(3), 662-667. doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.3.662
  37. Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Morris, D., Light, K., & Thompson, P. A. (2006). The motor activity log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology, 67(7), 1189-1194. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2
  38. Van der Pas, S. C., Verbunt, J. A., Breukelaar, D. E., van Woerden, R., & Seelen, H. A. (2011). Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(9), 1437-1442. doi:10.10 16/j.apmr.2011.02.021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.021
  39. Van Remoortel, H., Giavedoni, S., Raste, Y., Burtin, C., Louvaris, Z., Gimeno-Santos, E., ... & Troosters, T. (2012). Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-84

Cited by

  1. 뇌졸중 환자에서 한손 및 양손 활동 수행 시 가속도 분석 vol.10, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.22683/tsnr.2021.10.1.129