The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제9권6호
  • /
  • Pages.439-446
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement

  • Komurcuoglu, Meltem Bektas (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ordu University) ;
  • Sagirkaya, Elcin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ordu University) ;
  • Tulga, Ayca (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ordu University)
  • 투고 : 2017.02.23
  • 심사 : 2017.07.04
  • 발행 : 2017.12.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. To evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement by four point bending test. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The CAD/CAM materials under investigation were e.max CAD, Mark II, Lava Ultimate, and Enamic. A total of 400 bar specimens ($4{\times}1.2{\times}12mm$) (n=10) milled from the CAD/CAM blocks underwent various pretreatments (no pretreatment (C), hydrofluoric acid (A), hydrofluoric acid + universal adhesive (Scotchbond) (AS), sandblasting (Sb), and sandblasting + universal adhesive (SbS)). The bars were luted end-to-end on the prepared surfaces with a dual curing adhesive resin cement (Variolink N, Ivoclar Vivadent) on the custom-made stainless steel mold. Ten test specimens for each treatment and material combination were performed with four point bending test method. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS. The surface treatment and type of CAD/CAM restorative material showed a significant effect on the four point bending strength (FPBS) (P<.001). For LDC, AS surface treatment showed the highest FPBS results ($100.31{\pm}10.7MPa$) and the lowest values were obtained in RNC ($23.63{\pm}9.0MPa$) for control group. SEM analyses showed that the surface topography of CAD/CAM restorative materials was modified after treatments. CONCLUSION. The surface treatment of sandblasting or HF acid etching in combination with a universal adhesive containing MDP can be suggested for the adhesive cementation of the novel CAD/CAM restorative materials.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58:208-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003
  2. Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites. J Dent Res 2016;95:487-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516634286
  3. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J 2011;56:97-106.
  4. Della Bona A, Nogueira AD, Pecho OE. Optical properties of CAD-CAM ceramic systems. J Dent 2014;42:1202-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.005
  5. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93:1232-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514553976
  6. Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Lorenzoni FC, Sena LA, Hirata R, Bonfante G, Coelho PG. Probability of survival of implantsupported metal ceramic and CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic crowns. Dent Mater 2015;31:e168-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.006
  7. Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Vermeulen KM, Raghoebar GM, Cune MS. Clinical bonding of resin nano ceramic restorations to zirconia abutments: A case series within a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:984-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12382
  8. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. In-vitro strength degradation of dental ceramics and novel PICN material by sharp indentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;26:34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.05.004
  9. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013;29:419-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002
  10. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater 2014;30:564-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.019
  11. Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia-Godoy F, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:393-8.
  12. Reiss B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. Int J Comput Dent 2006;9:11-22.
  13. Roggendorf MJ, Kunzi B, Ebert J, Roggendorf HC, Frankenberger R, Reich SM. Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1413-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0642-8
  14. Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:241-6.
  15. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten-year results. Quintessence Int 2006;37:139-44.
  16. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, Kramer N, Reich S, Braun A, Roggendorf M. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.
  17. El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater 2003;19:575-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00107-0
  18. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Taschner M, Petschelt A, Nikolaenko SA. Adhesive luting revisited: influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:269-73.
  19. Dos Santos VH, Griza S, de Moraes RR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to composite submitted to different surface pretreatments. Restor Dent Endod 2014;39:12-6. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.12
  20. Elsaka SE. Effect of surface treatments on the bonding strength of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramics. Quintessence Int 2013;44:407.
  21. Li R. Development of a ceramic primer with higher bond durability for resin cement. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:560-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02060.x
  22. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:765-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003
  23. Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:531-40.
  24. Şanli S, Comlekoglu MD, Comlekoglu E, Sonugelen M, Pamir T, Darvell BW. Influence of surface treatment on the resinbonding of zirconia. Dent Mater 2015;31:657-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.004
  25. Touaiher I, Saadaoui M, Chevalier J, Reveron H. Effect of loading configuration on strength values in a highly transformable zirconia-based composite. Dent Mater 2016;32:e211-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.024
  26. Yassini E, Mirzaei M, Alimi A, Rahaeifard M. Investigation of the fatigue behavior of adhesive bonding of the lithium disilicate glass ceramic with three resin cements using rotating fatigue method. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;61:62-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.013
  27. Peumans M, Valjakova EB, De Munck J, Mishevska CB, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materials. J Adhes Dent 2016;18:289-302.
  28. Queiroz JR, Souza RO, Nogueira Junior L Jr, Ozcan M, Bottino MA. Influence of acid-etching and ceramic primers on the repair of a glass ceramic. Gen Dent 2012;60:e79-85.
  29. Schwenter J, Schmidli F, Weiger R, Fischer J. Adhesive bonding to polymer infiltrated ceramic. Dent Mater J 2016;35:796-802. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-271
  30. Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995;74:1591-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740091401
  31. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 2008;27:849-55. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.849
  32. Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res 1990;69:1791-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690120201
  33. Fischer J, Grohmann P, Stawarczyk B. Effect of zirconia surface treatments on the shear strength of zirconia/veneering ceramic composites. Dent Mater J 2008;27:448-54. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.448
  34. Lima JM, Anami LC, Rippe MP, de Melo RM, Bottino MA, Valera MC, Araujo MA. Surface agents' influence on the flexural strength of bilaminated ceramics. Braz Oral Res 2013;27:311-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013000400004
  35. Aboushelib MN, Sleem D. Microtensile bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramics to resin adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:547-52.
  36. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:265-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003
  37. Reich SM, Wichmann M, Frankenberger R, Zajc D. Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of three resin cements to a machinable feldspatic ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;74:740-6.
  38. Blatz MB, Phark JH, Ozer F, Mante FK, Saleh N, Bergler M, Sadan A. In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:187-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0278-0
  39. Souza RO, Castilho AA, Fernandes VV, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Durability of microtensile bond to nonetched and etched feldspar ceramic: self-adhesive resin cements vs conventional resin. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:155-62.
  40. Brentel AS, Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Alarca LG, Amaral R, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater 2007;23:1323-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.011
  41. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Yamauti M, Pashley DH, Tay F. Durability of resin-dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater 2007;23:885-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.030
  42. Pollington S, Fabianelli A, van Noort R. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to a novel fluorcanasite glass-ceramic following different surface treatments. Dent Mater 2010;26:864-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.04.011

피인용 문헌

  1. Influence of Alumina Air-Abrasion on Flexural and Shear Bond Strengths of CAD/CAM Composite vol.10, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10100927
  2. Wear of contemporary dental composite resin restorations: a literature review vol.46, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e18
  3. Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite CAD/CAM Restorations Placed by Undergraduate Students vol.10, pp.15, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153269