The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems

  • Kim, Dong-Yeon (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Eo-Bin (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School & BK21+ Program in Public Health Sciences, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
  • Received : 2017.01.14
  • Accepted : 2017.05.29
  • Published : 2017.12.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. To evaluate the fit of a three-unit metal framework of fixed dental prostheses made by subtractive and additive manufacturing. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One master model of metal was fabricated. Twenty silicone impressions were made on the master die, working die of 10 poured with Type 4 stone, and working die of 10 made of scannable stone. Ten three-unit wax frameworks were fabricated by wax-up from Type IV working die. Stereolithography files of 10 three-unit frameworks were obtained using a model scanner and three-dimensional design software on a scannable working die. The three-unit wax framework was fabricated using subtractive manufacturing (SM) by applying the prepared stereolithography file, and the resin framework was fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM); both used metal alloy castings for metal frameworks. Marginal and internal gap were measured using silicone replica technique and digital microscope. Measurement data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U-test (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. The lowest and highest gaps between premolar and molar margins were in the SM group and the AM group, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the marginal gap among the 3 groups (P<.001). In the marginal area where pontic was present, the largest gap was $149.39{\pm}42.30{\mu}m$ in the AM group, and the lowest gap was $24.40{\pm}11.92{\mu}m$ in the SM group. CONCLUSION. Three-unit metal frameworks made by subtractive manufacturing are clinically applicable. However, additive manufacturing requires more research to be applied clinically.

Keywords

References

  1. Ucar Y, Akova T, Akyil MS, Brantley WA. Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:253-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60165-7
  2. Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:582-93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00449.x
  3. Christensen GJ. Choosing an all-ceramic restorative material: porcelain-fused-to-metal or zirconia-based?. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:662-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0239
  4. Gorman CM, Ray NJ, Burke FM. The effect of endodontic access on all-ceramic crowns: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Dent 2016;53:22-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.005
  5. Ferrari M, Giovannetti A, Carrabba M, Bonadeo G, Rengo C, Monticelli F, Vichi A. Fracture resistance of three porcelainlayered CAD/CAM zirconia frame designs. Dent Mater 2014;30:e163-8.
  6. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  7. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 2008;24:1311-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.011
  8. Park JY, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:294-302. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.294
  9. Pradies G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martinez-Rus F. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 2015;43:201-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.007
  10. Sarrett DC. Prediction of clinical outcomes of a restoration based on in vivo marginal quality evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:117-20.
  11. Seo D, Yi Y, Roh B. The effect of preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps in Cerec3 partial ceramic crowns. J Dent 2009;37:374-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.01.008
  12. Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1985;1:197-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80019-1
  13. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  14. Kim CM, Kim SR, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:624-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.014
  15. Baba NZ. Materials and processes for CAD/CAM complete denture fabrication. Curr Oral Health Rep 2016;33:203-8.
  16. Kim DY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:260-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.007
  17. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  18. Wong KV, Hernandez A. A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng 2012; Jun 17. doi: 10.5402/2012/208760.
  19. Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011;27:356-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015
  20. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  21. Holmes JR, Pilcher ES, Rivers JA, Stewart RM. Marginal fit of electroformed ceramometal crowns. J Prosthodont 1996;5:111-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00284.x
  22. Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dent Mater 2009;25:94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.018
  23. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01203.x
  24. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  25. Neves FD, Prado CJ, Prudente MS, Carneiro TA, Zancope K, Davi LR, Mendonca G, Cooper LF, Soares CJ. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1134-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.028
  26. Pelekanos S, Koumanou M, Koutayas SO, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In-Ceram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:278-92.
  27. Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH. Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1432-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.002
  28. Berger U. Aspects of accuracy and precision in the additive manufacturing of plastic gears. J Virtual Phys Prototyp 2015;10:49-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1026127

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner vol.10, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.328
  2. Comparative clinical study of the marginal discrepancy of fixed dental prosthesis fabricated by the milling-sintering method using a presintered alloy vol.11, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.280
  3. 치과용 3D 프린터로 제작된 임시 수복용 레진의 정확도 평가 vol.19, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20190094