DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Driver Perception-Reaction Time in High-Speed Driving Situations

고속주행상황의 운전자 인지·반응시간에 관한 연구

  • 최재성 (서울시립대학교 교통공학과) ;
  • 정승원 (서울시립대학교 교통공학과) ;
  • 김정민 (서울시립대학교 교통공학과) ;
  • 김태호 (국토교통부 운영지원과) ;
  • 신준수 (서울대학교 건설환경공학부)
  • Received : 2016.12.07
  • Accepted : 2017.01.31
  • Published : 2017.02.15

Abstract

PURPOSES : The desire of drivers to increase their driving speeds is increasing in response to the technological advancements in vehicles and roads. Therefore, studies are being conducted to increase the maximum design speed in Korea to 140 km/h. The stopping sight distance (SSD) is an important criterion for acquiring sustained road safety in road design. Moreover, although the perception-reaction time (PRT) is a critical variable in the calculation of the SSD, there are not many current studies on PRT. Prior to increasing the design speed, it is necessary to confirm whether the domestic PRT standard (2.5 s) is applicable to high-speed driving. Thus, in this study, we have investigated the influence of high-speed driving on PRT. METHODS : A driving simulator was used to record the PRT of drivers. A virtual driving map was composed using UC-Win/Road software. Experiments were carried out at speeds of 100, 120, and 140 km/h while assuming the following three driving scenarios according to driver expectation: Expected, Unexpected, and Surprised. Lastly, we analyzed the gaze position of the driver as they drove in the simulated environment using Smarteye. RESULTS : Driving simulator experimental results showed that the PRT of drivers decreased as driving speed increased from 100 km/h to 140 km/h. Furthermore, the gaze position analysis results demonstrated that the decrease in PRT of drivers as the driving speed increased was directly related to their level of concentration. CONCLUSIONS : In the experimental results, 85% of drivers responded within 2.0 s at a driving speed of 140 km/h. Thus, the results obtained here verify that the current domestic standard of 2.5 s can be applied in the highways designated to have 140 km/h maximum speed.

Keywords

References

  1. AASHTO, 2004. A Policy on geometric design of highways and streets.
  2. A study on application of increased max speed limit on the highways, 2011. Master's Course Paper Jeonnam University, Korea. (홍정표, 2011. 고속도로 최고제한속도 상향 적용방안에 관한 연구. 전남대학교 학위논문, 대한민국)
  3. Cohen A. S, 1980. Feed Forward Programming of car driver's eye movement behavior. A system Theoretical Approach, Final Report volumes.
  4. Choo Jaehong, Kim Junnyeon, Lee Chunsik, Ha Seongsu, 2010. A Study of Perception Response Time on Various Operating Speeds. Journal of Korean Society of Transportation Vol.2010 No.63, Korea. (주재홍, 김준년, 이춘식, 하성수, 2010. 차량주행속도에 따른 운전자 인지반응시간 연구. 대한교통학회 학술대회지 Vol.2010 No.63, 대한민국)
  5. Daniel. B, Fambro, 1997. Determination of Stopping Sight Distances. NCHRP Report 400.
  6. Fambro D. B, Koppa R. J, Picha D. L, Fitzpatrick K, 1998. Driver Perception Brake Response in stopping sight distancs Situations. TRR 1682.
  7. George T. Taoka, 1989. Brake reaction times of unalerted drivers. ITE Journal, 19-21.
  8. Green, Marc, Allen, Merrill J., Weintraub, Leslie. 2009. Forensic Vision with Application to Highway Safety. Lawyers & JudgesPubCo.
  9. Jang Myeongsu, Lee Seonggwan, Kim Jinsu, Hong Seongmin, Lee Gangjin, 2011. The Chronological Evolution of Driver's Perception Reaction Time. Transportation Technology and Policy Vol.8 No.6, Korea. (장명순, 이성관, 김진수, 홍성민, 이강진, 2011. 운전자 인지반 응시간의 시대전 진화 연구. 교통 기술과 정책 Vol.8 No.6, 대한민국).
  10. Jeon Jinu, Lee Subeom, Park Juntae, Um Daeryong, 2008. Analysis of Driver's Perception-Response Time Using Driving Simulator in the Age Categories. Journal of Korean Society of Transportation Vol.2008 No.1, Korea. (전진우, 이수범, 박준태, 엄대룡, 2008. 차량시뮬레이터를 이 용한 연령별 운전자 인지반응시간 분석. 대한교통학회 학 술대회지 Vol.2008 No.1, 대한민국).
  11. John D. Lee, Joshua D. Hoffman, Timothy L. Brown, Daniel V. McGehee, 2002. Comparison of Driver Braking Responses in a High Fidelity Driving Simulator and on a Test Track. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Report No. DOT HS 809 447.
  12. Kang Seonuk, Kim Sanggu, 2009. Decision Process of Driver's Reaction Time and its Direction to Improvement. Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society Vol.209 No.3 pp.627-632, Korea. (강선욱, 김상구, 2009. 운전자 반응시간의 결정과정과 개선방 향에 관한 연구. 대한교통학회 학술대회지 Vol.2009 No.3 pp.627-632, 대한민국)
  13. Kim Daeung, Lim Chaemun, 1991. Study on Analysis of Driver's Visual Characteristics in Road Traffic and Its Applications. Journal of Korea Transportation Research Society Vol.9 No.2, Korea. (김대웅, 임채문, 1991. 도로교통에 있어서 운전자 주시특성분 석과 그 적용성에 관한 연구. 대한교통학회지 Vol.9 No.2, 대한민국).
  14. Koppa R. J, Fambro D. B, Zimmer R. A, 1986. Measuring Driver Performance in braking Maneuver. TRB 1550.
  15. Lim Joonbeom, Lee Soobeom, Joo Sungkab, Shin Joonsoo, 2013. Analysis of Anxiety EGG per Driving Speed on Different Design Speed Road. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers Vol.33 No.5, Korea. (임준범, 이수범, 주성갑, 신준수, 2013. 상이한 설계속도 도로 에서의 주행속도별 불안뇌파 분석. 대한토목학회논문집 Vol.33 No.5, 대한민국).
  16. MLTMA, 2013. 'Highway Geometric Design Standards and Regulation' Ministry of Land & Transportation and Maritime Affairs (국토교통부, 2013. 도로의 구조₩시설 기준에 관한 규칙)
  17. Oh Dongseop, 2001. The Study of Driver Perception-Reaction Time during Yellow Change Interval of Signalized Intersections. Department of Transportation Engineering Graduate School of the ajou university, Korea. (오동섭, 2001. 운전자 행태도출을 위한 신호교차로 황색신호 시 인지반응시간연구. 아주대학교 대학원 학위논문, 대한 민국).
  18. Park Youngjin, 2016. An Analysis of Driver Eye Movements on Expressway Ramps based on Driving Simulator. Department of Transportation Engineering Graduate School of the University of Seoul, Korea. (박용진, 2016. 고속도로 연결로 구간에서의 운전자 시각행태 특성 연구. 서울시립대학교 대학원 학위논문, 대한민국).
  19. P.L. Olson, P.S. Fancher, 1984. Parameters affecting stopping sight distance. NCHRP Report 270.