구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제33권4호
  • /
  • Pages.252-259
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

임플란트 지지 고정성 보철물에서 금과 지르코니아의 마모 비교에 대한 임상 연구

Clinical study on the comparison of gold and zirconia wear in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis

  • 김지환 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철과학교실) ;
  • 양승원 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철과학교실) ;
  • 오남식 (인하대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Kim, Jee-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yang, Seung-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Oh, NamSik (Division in Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2017.06.24
  • 심사 : 2017.09.07
  • 발행 : 2017.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 지르코니아 전장관과 금전장관으로 수복된 임플란트 지지 고정성 보철물의 장착 후 초기 6개월간의 마모를 비교 분석하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 2015년 1월부터 2016년 1월까지, 대구치 부위에 임플란트 지지 고정성 보철 수복을 요하는 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 총 47개에 대하여 임플란트 지지 고정성 보철물과 대합치에 대해 조사를 시행하였으며, 보철물 장착 1주 및 6개월 후 보철물 및 대합치를 인상채득 하여 교합면의 형태를 인기 하였다. 인상체를 스캔하여 보철물 및 대합치의 교합면 형태를 비교하여 마모 분석을 시행하였다. SPSS (Version 23.0; SPSS, IBM Corporation, Armonk, USA) 프로그램을 이용하여 정규성 분석 후 Mann-Whitney 분석을 시행하였다. 결과: 임플란트 지지 고정성 보철물에서 지르코니아 전장관과 금전장관 보철물의 6개월간 평균 수직거리 차의 중앙값은 각각 $50.84{\mu}m$, $42.84{\mu}m$로 통계적 유의차가 없었다(P > 0.05). 대합치가 자연치인 경우, 지르코니아 전장관 및 금전장관 보철물의 6개월간 평균 수직거리 차의 중앙값은 각각 $47.72{\mu}m$, $41.97{\mu}m$였으며, 대합치 법랑질의 평균 수직거리 차의 중앙값은 각각 $47.26{\mu}m$, $44.59{\mu}m$이었고, 통계적 유의차는 없었다(P > 0.05). 결론: 조사 기간이 짧았고, 실험군의 개수가 적었다는 단점이 있지만, 임플란트 지지 고정성 보철물 장착 후 초기 6개월간의 마모 비교에서 지르코니아 전장관과 금전장관은 유의한 차이가 없었고, 대합되는 자연치 법랑질의 마모도 유의한 차이는 없었다.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the wear of a prosthesis for 6 months after restoration with implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis made of either zirconia or gold. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on patients requiring implant-supported fixed dental prostheses on first or second molar from January, 2015 to January, 2016. A total of 47 prostheses and antagonists were examined. Occlusal surface was recorded by impression of each prosthesis and antagonist 1 week and 6 months after prosthesis delivery. The digital files were created by impression scan. Occlusal shapes of 1 week and 6 months were compared and wear of prostheses and antagonists was analyzed. The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyzed the result data underwent normality test using SPSS (Version 23.0, IBM Corporation) Results: Mann-Whitney test revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the median amount of mean vertical wear for 6 months in zirconia ($50.84{\mu}m$) and gold ($42.84{\mu}m$) prostheses (P > 0.05). When the opposing teeth were natural, the median amount of mean vertical wear of zirconia and gold prostheses was $47.72{\mu}m$ and $41.97{\mu}m$, respectively, and the median amount of mean vertical wear of enamel was $47.26{\mu}m$ and $44.59{\mu}m$, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Despite the short study period and the small number of experimental groups, zirconia and gold showed no significant difference in wear during the first 6 months. Opposing natural enamel also showed no significant difference in the wear.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  2. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:449-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002
  3. Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Gueth JF, Edelhoff D, Naumann M. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns. Dent Mater 2012;28:449-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.024
  4. Kim MJ, Oh SH, Kim JH, Ju SW, Seo DG, Jun SH, Ahn JS, Ryu JJ. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains. J Dent 2012;40:979-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.004
  5. Mitov G, Heintze SD, Walz S, Woll K, Muecklich F, Pospiech P. Wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against natural enamel after different finishing procedures. Dent Mater 2012;28:909-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.010
  6. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater 2008;24:433-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.016
  7. Mahalick JA, Knap FJ, Weiter EJ. Occlusal wear in prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;82:154-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1971.0018
  8. Sulong MZ, Aziz RA. Wear of materials used in dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:342-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90209-U
  9. Hacker CH, Wagner WC, Razzoog ME. An in vitro investigation of the wear of enamel on porcelain and gold in saliva. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:14-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90412-6
  10. al-Hiyasat AS, Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith GM, Gilmour WH. Investigation of human enamel wear against four dental ceramics and gold. J Dent 1998;26:487-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00041-9
  11. Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:22-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60005-0
  12. Mundhe K, Jain V, Pruthi G, Shah N. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:358-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.001
  13. Kwon MS, Oh SY, Cho SA. Two-body wear comparison of zirconia crown, gold crown, and enamel against zirconia. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;47:21-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.029