한국임상수의학회지 (Journal of Veterinary Clinics)

  • 제34권6호
  • /
  • Pages.420-424
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1598-298X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0749(eISSN)
한국임상수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Radiographic Uterine Diameter Evaluation for the Detection of Uterine Disease in Dogs: A Retrospective Study

  • Yun, Sookyung (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jeosoon (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Mincheol (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yoon, Junghee (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.08.07
  • 심사 : 2017.09.22
  • 발행 : 2017.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Cystic endometrial hyperplasia (CEH) and uterine dilation (hydro-, muco-, hemato- and pyometra) are common uterine diseases in intact female dogs. The aim of the present study was to assess the usefulness of digital abdominal radiography in diagnosing uterine disease in intact female dogs. Two hundred and thirteen intact female dogs were included, and were classified into four groups on the basis of radiographic uterine visibility (visible/invisible) and ultrasonographic findings (normal uterus/abnormal uterine condition including CEH and uterine dilation). For each dog, the ratio of the maximum uterine diameter to the height of the fifth lumbar vertebral body (U/L5 ratio) was calculated on radiographs. There were 78 and 135 dogs in the normal and abnormal groups, respectively; 34.6% normal and 53.5% abnormal uteri were visible on abdominal radiographs. Our results suggested that a mean U/L5 ratio of $1.18{\pm}0.53$ ($mean{\pm}2SD$) indicated a normal radiographic uterus diameter, and that a value of > 1.60 should be used as an indicator of uterine disease in clinical practice. However, because false negative results were noted, radiography cannot replace ultrasonography for assessment of the uterus.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ackerman N. Radiographic evaluation of the uterus: a review. Vet Radiol 1981; 22: 252-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1981.tb01382.x
  2. Armbrust LJ, Biller DS, Hoskinson JJ. Compression radiography: an old technique revisited. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36: 537-541. https://doi.org/10.5326/15473317-36-6-537
  3. Bigliardi E, Parmigiani E, Cavirani S, Luppi A, Bonatim L, Corradi A. Ultrasonography and cystic hyperplasia-pyometra complex in the bitch. Reprod Domest Anim 2004; 39: 36-140.
  4. Davidson AP, Baker TW. Reproductive ultrasound of the bitch and queen. Top Companion Anim Med 2009; 24: 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tcam.2008.11.002
  5. De Bosschere H, Ducatelle R, Vermeirsch H, Van Den Broeck W, Coryn M. Cystic endometrial hyperplasia-pyometra complex in the bitch: should the two entities be disconnected? Theriogenology 2001; 55: 1509-1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00498-8
  6. Dow C. The cystic hyperplasia-pyometra complex in the bitch. J Comp Path 1959; 69: 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0368-1742(59)80023-0
  7. England GC, Yeager, AE. Ultrasonographic appearance of the ovary and uterus of the bitch during oestrus, ovulation and early pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 47: 107-117.
  8. Farrow CS. Abdominal compression radiography in the dog and cat. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1978; 14: 337-342.
  9. Feldman EC, Nelson RW. Cystic endometrial hyperplasia/pyometra complex. In: Canine and feline endocrinology and reproduction, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 2004: 852-867.
  10. Finco DR, Stiles NS, Kneller SK, Lewis RE, Barrett RB. Radiologic estimation of kidney size of the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1971; 159: 995-1002.
  11. Fontaine E, Levy X, Grellet A, Bernex F, Boulouis HJ, Fontbonne A. Diagnosis of endometritis in the bitch: a new approach. Reprod Domest Anim 2009; 44: 196-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01376.x
  12. Gerstman BB, Cappucci DT. Evaluating the reliability of diagnostic test results. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1986; 188: 248-251.
  13. Graham JP, Lord PF, Harrison JM. Quantitative estimation of intestinal dilation as a predictor of obstruction in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 521-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03698.x
  14. Kim JH, Park CH, Mun BG, Kim HS, Kim BS, Lee JH, Park IC, Kim JT, Suh GH, Oh KS. Serial ultrasonographic appearance of normal uterus during estrous cycle in miniature schnauzer dogs. J Embryo Transf 2009; 24: 109-113.
  15. Kinns J, Nelson, N. The uterus, ovaries, and testes. In: Textbook of veterinary diagnostic radiology, 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders. 2013: 757-768.
  16. Korner M, Weber CH, Wirth S, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser MF, Treitl M. Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview. Radiographics 2007; 27: 675-686. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.273065075
  17. Lee R, Leowijuk C. Normal parameters in abdominal radiology of the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract 1982; 23: 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1982.tb01664.x
  18. Pharr JW, Post K. Ultrasonography and radiography of the canine postpartum uterus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1992; 33: 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1992.tb01954.x
  19. Pretzer SD. Clinical presentation of canine pyometra and mucometra: a review. Theriogenology 2008; 70: 359-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.028
  20. Rivers B, Johnston GR. Diagnostic imaging of the reproductive organs of the bitch. Methods and limitations. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1991; 21: 437-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(91)50053-X
  21. Schafer-Somi S. Common uterine disorders in the bitch: challenges to diagnosis and treatment. Revista Brasileira De Reproduo Animal 2015; 39: 234-239.
  22. Schalafer DH. Diseases of the canine uterus. Reprod Domest Anim 2012; 47: 318-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12064
  23. Smith FO. Canine pyometra. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 610-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.04.023
  24. van Bree H, Jacobs V, Vandekerckhove P. Radiographic assessment of liver volume in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1998; 50: 1613-1615.
  25. Voges A, Neuwirth L. Ultrasound diagnosis-cystic uterine hyperplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1996; 37: 131-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1996.tb01210.x
  26. Woodland M, Pack L, Rist P. Comparison of digital radiography, ultrasonography, and positive contrast vaginourethrography for determining reproductive status of female cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014; 55: 368-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12134
  27. Yeager AE, Concannon PW. Ultrasonography of the reproductive tract of the female dog and cat. In: Kirk's current veterinary therapy, 12th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1995: 1040-1052.