DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimating the economic value of agricultural water using the virtual water concept

  • Received : 2017.07.05
  • Accepted : 2017.09.07
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Water is an essential resource for human survival. According to the OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050, rapid industrialization and a global population increase by approximately two billion will likely increase global water use by 55% in 2050. However, water depletion has been getting worse than before and has been happening more quickly, as Earth's water resources are limited. The present study proposes water management measures by using the virtual water theory which enables water consumption measurement and the confirmation and recognition of water scarcity problems, and will support the development of counter-measures. As a method for estimating the value of agricultural water, virtual water theory was used to calculate the amount of agricultural water input for domestic rice and to apply prices of agricultural water in the United States and China to Korean water prices. When the Chinese price was applied to Korean water prices, the value of agricultural water represented 0.3% of the Korean rice producer's price. When the US price was applied to Korean water prices, the value of agricultural water represented 1.6% of the domestic rice producer's price. The study exposes the percentage of the value of agricultural water in agricultural product prices, as well as how this scare resource may affect future prices. In the future, if there are water charges to effectively manage agricultural water, this study, which uses the virtual water theory, can be used as a preliminary research.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn JH, Lee JG, Lee SH, Hong IP. 2010. Evaluation of virtual water calculation method in Korea. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 43:583-595. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2010.43.6.583
  2. Allan JA. 2003. Virtual water - the water, food and trade nexus, useful concept or misleading metaphor? Water International 28:4-11.
  3. Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY. 2004. Water footprints of nations, Value of water research report series No. 16, UNESCO-IHE.
  4. Kim YH, Kim HS, Kim JS. 2012. A Study on the introduction and utilization of virtual water to agriculture. Korea Rural Economic Institute. [in Korean]
  5. KOTRA. 2017. Korea trade-investment promotion agency overseas market news, China water poverty country. Accessed in http://news.kotra.or.kr/user/globalAllBbs/kotranews/ on 8 Sep 2017. [in Korean]
  6. Lee EK, Hong SJ. 2016. Analysis of the relationship between garlic and onion acreage response. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:136-143. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160016
  7. Lee SH, Choi JY, Yoo, SH. 2010. International virtual-water flows related to coffee trade in Korea. The KCID Journal 17:62-73. [in Korean]
  8. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2016. Water vision 2020. [in Korean]
  9. OECD. 2010. OECD environmental outlook to 2050, OECD Publishing.
  10. Seo JW, Kim YH. 2016. An analysis of the relationship between farming capability of farmers and farm household income. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:127-135. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160015
  11. Yoo SH, Choi JY, Kim T, Im JB, Chun C. 2009. Estimation of crop virtual water in Korea. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 42:911-920. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2009.42.11.911

Cited by

  1. Comparison of reference evapotranspiration estimation methods with limited data in South Korea vol.46, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20190004