Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research

충남대학교 아시아여론조사학회 (Center for Asian Public Opinion Research & Collaboration Initiative)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Public Opinion of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in South Korea: Examining the Effects of Communal and Exchange Relationships Between Citizens and Corporations

  • Lee, Soobum (Department of Mass Communication Incheon National University) ;
  • Jin, Bumsub (School of Advertising and Public Relations Hongik University)
  • 발행 : 2017.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study explores how South Korean citizens evaluate corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices based on communal and exchange relationships. Specifically, it examines whether their evaluations of the two types of relationships are related to their supportive opinions, such as positive attitudes toward corporations and behavioral intentions to purchase products. The findings show that the communal relationship between an energy corporation and its local residents is more related to their supportive opinions than exchange relationship. That is, a communal relationship tends to generate more positive business outcomes than an exchange relationship. This study concludes that corporations should prepare for useful community outreach and CSR programs for their local community. Practitioners need to focus on building communal relationships with community members through their programs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Bae, J., & Cameron, G. T. (2006). The conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 144-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.007
  3. Bortree, D. S. (2007). Relationships management with adolescent publics: The role of relationship maintenance strategies and relational quality outcomes on adolescents' intended behavior (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.
  4. Boynton, L. A. (2002). Professionalism and social responsibility: Foundations of public relations ethics. Communication Yearbook, 26, 230-265. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15567419cy2601_7
  5. Grunig, J. E. (2000). Collectivism, collaboration, and societal corporatism as core professional values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 23-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1201_3
  6. Grunig, J. E., Grunig, L. A., & Ehling, W. P. (1992). What is an effective organization? In J. E. Grunig, D. M. Dozier, W. P. Ehling, L. A. Grunig, F. R., Repper, & J. White (Eds.), Excellence public relations and communication management: Contributions to effective organizations (pp. 65-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Grunig, J. E., & Huang, Y. H. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. In J. A. Ledingham & S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: The Institute for Public Relations.
  9. Jin, B. (2015). How do South Koreans perceive corporate social capital and its benefits?: An application to corporations and community. Asian Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2015.3.1.1
  10. Ki, E.-J. (2006). Linkages among relationship maintenance strategies, relationship quality outcomes, and attitude, and behavioral intentions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)., University of Florida.
  11. Ki, E.-J., & Hon, L. C. (2012). Causal linkages among relationship quality perception, attitude, and behavior intention in a membership organization. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17(2), 187-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13563281211220274
  12. Kim, D., & Choi, M.-I. (2013). A comparison of young publics' evaluations of corporate social responsibility practices of multinational corporations in the United States and South Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(1), 105-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1285-7
  13. Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(98)80020-9
  14. Ledingham, J. A., Bruning, S. D., Thomlison, T. D., & Lesko, C. (1997). The applicability of the interpersonal relationship dimensions to an organizational context: Toward a theory of relational loyalty a qualitative approach. Academy of Managerial Communication Journal, 1(1), 23-43.
  15. Molleda, J. C., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Public relations roles in Brazil: Hierarchy eclipses gender differences. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(4), 327-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1604_1
  16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008). OECD broadband Statistics. Paris: France, OECD, Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document/54//0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html
  17. Statistics Korea & Eurostat European Commission (SK & ES) (2012). The European Union and the Republic of Korea: A statistical portrait. European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5741141/KS-32-11-816-EN.PDF/55b4ae34-b5ce-4581-93af-b25caf43f52f
  18. Yankey, J. A. (1996). Corporate support of nonprofit organizations. In D. F. Burlingame & D. R. Young (Eds.), Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads (pp. 7-22). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  19. Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251929