Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제30권1호
  • /
  • Pages.51-56
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Residual frying oil in the diets of sheep: intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and ruminal parameters

  • 투고 : 2015.11.26
  • 심사 : 2016.02.11
  • 발행 : 2017.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the intake and nutrient digestibility, nitrogen balance and ruminal ammonia nitrogen in lambs of diets containing different levels of residual frying oil. Methods: Levels of 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 g/kg dry matter (DM) base of residual frying oil in the diets of lambs were evaluated. Five castrated lambs with initial body weights of $36.8{\pm}3.3kg$, distributed in a Latin square ($5{\times}5$) design, were used. Results: There was a decreasing linear effect on the intake of DM, organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), total carbohydrates (TCH), and nonfibrous carbohydrates (NFC). There was an increased linear intake of ether extract (EE). The apparent digestibility of DM, OM, CP, NDF, TCH, and NFC, as well as urine nitrogen excretion, nitrogen balance and ruminal parameters, were not influenced by different levels of residual frying oil in the diet. EE digestibility presented a crescent linear effect. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the addition of residual frying oil to the diets of sheep can affect nutrient intake without affecting the digestibility of most nutrients (with the exception of EE), nitrogen balance and ruminal ammonia nitrogen concentration.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Silva MMC, Rodrigues MT, Branco RH, et al. Effects of fat supplements on intake and efficiency of nutrient utilization in lactating dairy goats. R Bras Zootec 2016;36:257-67.
  2. Valinote AC, Nogueira Filho JCM, Leme PR, et al. Effects of feeding monensin and different sources of fat on the ruminal population of ciliate protozoa in Nellore steers. R Bras Zootec 2005;34:1418-23. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000400040
  3. Cenkvari, E, Fekete S, Febel H, et al. Investigations on the effects of Ca-soap of linseed oil on rumen fermentation in sheep and on milk composition of goats. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2005;89:172-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00538.x
  4. NRC (National Research Council). Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids and new world camelids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
  5. Mizubuti, IY, Pinto AP, Pereira ES, et al. Laboratory methods of feedstuff evaluation. Londrina, PR, Brazil: EDUEL- Editora da Universidade Estadual de Londrina; 2009.
  6. Sniffen, CJ, O'Connor JD, Van Soest PJ, et al. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J Anim Sci 1992;70:3562-77. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x
  7. Coelho da Silva JF, Leao MI. Fundamentals of Ruminants Nutrition. Piracicaba, SP, Brazil: Livroceres;1979.
  8. Decandia M, Sitzia M, Cabiddu A, Kababya D, Molle G. The use of polyethylene glycol to reduce the anti-nutritional effects of tannins in goats fed woody species. Small Rumin Res 2000;38:157-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00145-0
  9. Zeoula LM, Caldas Neto SF, Geron LJV, et al. Cassava by-product flour replacing corn in ration for sheep: intake, digestibility, nitrogen and energy balances and ruminal parameters. R Bras Zootec 2003;32:491-502. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982003000200030
  10. Preston, T R. Biological and chemical analytical methods. In: Preston TR, editor. Tropical Animal Feeding: A Manual for Research Workers. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1995. p. 191-264.
  11. R. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Italy.
  12. Palmquist DL, Mattos WRS. Metabolism of Lipids. In: Berchielli TT, Pires AV, Oliveira SG, editors. Ruminants Nutrition, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil: FUNEP; 2006. p. 287-310.
  13. Van Soest PJ. Nutrition eecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY, USA: Comstock Publishing Associates; 1994.
  14. Forbes JM. Natural feeding behavior and feed section. In: Heidde D, Huisman EA, Kanis E, Osse JMW, Verstegen M, editors. Regulation of Feed Intake. Wageningen, Netherlands: CAB International; 1999. p. 3-12.
  15. Nunes AS, Oliveira RL, Borja MS, et al. Intake, digestibility and blood parameters of lambs fed diets with palm kernel. Archiv Zootec 2011;60:903-12. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922011000400007
  16. Bateman II HG, Jenkins TC. Influence of soybean oil in high fiber diets fed to nonlactating cows on ruminal unsaturated fatty acids and nutrient digestibility. J Dairy Sci 1998;81:2451-8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70136-5
  17. Pimentel PG, Pereira ES, Queiroz AC, et al. Intake, apparent nutrient digestibility and ingestive behavior of sheep fed cashew nut meal. R. Bras Zootec 2011;40:1128-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000500026
  18. Alves EM, Pedreira MS, Pereira MLA, et al. Mesquite pod meal associated with levels of urea on feeding sheep: Nitrogen balance, plasma urea-N and ruminal parameters. Acta Sci 2012;34:287-95.
  19. Hristov AN, Ropp JK, Grandeen KL, et al. Effect of carbohydrate source on ammonia utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci 2005;83:408-21. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.832408x
  20. Vargas LH, Lana RP, Jham GN, et al. Lipids in the ration of dairy cows: ruminal fermentation parameters, milk production and composition. R Bras Zootec 2002;31:522-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982002000200029
  21. Preston TR. Analytical methods for characterizing. In: Preston TR, editor. Feed resourses for ruminants. better utilization of crop residues and by products in animal feeding: research guidelines. A Practical Manual for Research Workers. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1986. p.99.