DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Extraction Method on Anserine, Protein, and Iron Contents of Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) Extracts

연어(Oncorhynchus keta) 추출물 중의 Anserine, 단백질 및 철분 함량에 미치는 추출방법의 영향

  • Min, Hye-Ok (Busan Regional Office of Food and Drug Safety) ;
  • Park, In-Myoung (Department of Oriental Cuisine and Culinary Arts, Youngsan University) ;
  • Song, Ho-Su (Department of Western Cuisine and Culinary Arts, Youngsan University)
  • 민혜옥 (부산식품의약품안전청) ;
  • 박인명 (영산대학교 동양조리학과) ;
  • 송호수 (영산대학교 서양조리학과)
  • Received : 2016.09.29
  • Accepted : 2017.01.19
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

Effects of extraction methods on reducing concentrations of pro-oxidants (total iron and protein) of salmon was determined. For development of the extraction process, the effectiveness of several extraction methods was determined and compared, including heat treatment (60, 80, and $100^{\circ}C$), ion exchange and carboxymethyl (CM)-cellulose column chromatography, and ultrafiltration (UF). Protein, total iron, and anserine contents of salmon extracts were 23.64 mg/mL, $16.20{\mu}g/mL$, and 5.47 mg/mL in non-heated extracts, 7.40 mg/mL, $2.32{\mu}g/mL$, and 5.20 mg/mL in heated extracts at $60^{\circ}C$, 7.64 mg/mL, $1.20{\mu}g/mL$, and 5.21 mg/mL at $80^{\circ}C$, and 7.04 mg/mL, $0.68{\mu}g/mL$, and 4.04 mg/mL at $100^{\circ}C$, respectively. Heating and UF decreased contents of protein and total iron, whereas only UF slightly decreased anserine content. Application of the primary ion exchange method increased the content of anserine up to 16%. Protein and total iron contents by the primary ion exchange method decreased by 70 and 98%, respectively. Secondary ion exchange (CM-cellulose) treatment after primary ion exchange and UF resulted in lower anserine content than the primary ion exchange method. However, the content of impurities (protein, total iron) was lower than in all other salmon extracts. Therefore, primary ion exchange, UF, and secondary ion exchange method were the best extraction processes in this study.

본 연구는 수산동물을 원료로 한 천연 anserine의 추출을 위해 여러 추출방법을 이용하여 연어로부터 anserine을 추출하였으며 각 추출방법에 따른 불순물(protein, iron)과 anserine의 함량 변화를 살펴보았다. Anserine 추출용 시료로서 연어의 적합성을 알아보기 위해 아미노산 함량을 분석한 결과 전체 아미노산 함량 중 anserine은 약 43.06%를 차지하는 것으로 나타나 추출용 시료로 적합한 것으로 나타났고, 추출방법에 따른 함량 변화를 살펴보기 위해 가열처리와 한외여과처리, 그리고 이온교환 및 한외여과처리를 이용한 추출방법에 따른 함량 변화를 살펴본 결과 $60^{\circ}C$, $80^{\circ}C$, $100^{\circ}C$로 가열 처리한 경우 $100^{\circ}C$ 가열처리구가 총철과 단백질 등 불순물 제거에 가장 효과적이었으나, anserine 함량의 감소가 큰 것으로 나타났다. 한외여과방법을 통해 분자량을 조절한 추출물의 함량 변화를 측정한 결과에서는 가열처리 추출물보다 단백질 약 81%, 총철 함량이 약 97% 감소하는 결과를 나타내었으며, anserine의 함량 변화는 가열처리구와 비슷한 수준을 유지하였다. 또한, Dowex $1{\times}8$ 수지를 이용하여 1차 이온교환을 하고 이온 교환한 추출물을 이용하여 MW 500까지 한외여과처리를 한 후 CM-cellulose를 이용하여 2차 이온교환을 병행한 추출물의 함량 변화를 살펴본 결과, 가열-한외여과처리 추출물보다 단백질 및 총철의 함량은 감소했지만 상대적으로 높은 anserine 함량을 나타내어 이온교환-한외여과처리 추출방법이 단백질 및 총철과 같은 불순물의 함량은 낮추면서 상대적으로 anserine의 함량을 높일 수 있는 추출방법이라 사료된다. 또한, 이러한 경향은 전기영동 및 HPLC를 통해 확인할 수 있었으며, LC/MS를 이용하여 표품 anserine과 1차 이온교환-한외여과처리 추출물, 2차 이온교환 추출물을 분석한 결과 모두 동일한 분자량(MW 240)을 가진 물질로 확인되어 1, 2차 이온교환 및 한외여과처리를 병행한 추출법이 anserine의 추출에 있어서 효율적인 방법으로 생각한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Auh JH, Namgung N, Shin KS, Park SW, Paik IK. 2010. Effects of supplementary blood meal on the content of carnosine and anserine in broiler meat. J Poult Sci 47: 302-309. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.010024
  2. Aursand M, Jorgensen L, Grasdalen H. 1995. Quantitative high-resolution $^{13}C$ nuclear magnetic resonance of anserine and lactate in white muscle of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Comp Biochem Physiol 112B: 315-321.
  3. Suyama M, Suzuki T, Nonaka J. 1967. Chromatographic determination of imidazole compounds in the whale meat. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 33: 141-146. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.33.141
  4. Abe H, Okuma E. 1991. Effect of temperature on the buffering capacities of histidine-related compounds and fish skeletal muscle. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 57: 2101-2107. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.57.2101
  5. Huang SC, Kuo JC. 2000. Concentrations and antioxidative activity of anserine and carnosine in poultry meat extracts treated with demineralization and papain. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B 24: 193-201.
  6. Wu HC, Shiau CY, Chen HM, Chiou TK. 2003. Antioxidant activities of carnosine, anserine, some free amino acids and their combination. J Food Drug Anal 11: 148-153.
  7. Decker EA, Crum AD. 1993. Antioxidant activity of carnosine in cooked ground pork. Meat Sci 34: 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(93)90031-C
  8. Kanner J, Salan MA, Harel S, Shegalovich I. 1991. Lipid peroxidation of muscle food: the role of the cytosolic fraction. J Agric Food Chem 39: 242-246. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00002a003
  9. Chan KM, Decker EA, Means WJ. 1993. Extraction and activity of carnosine, a naturally occurring antioxidant in beef muscle. J Food Sci 58: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb03199.x
  10. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA. p 777-788.
  11. Seo SS, Kim MH, No HK, Kim SD. 2002. Cooking characteristics of coated rice with water homogenate of citrus fruits peel. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 12: 318-325.
  12. Gopalakrishnan J, Decker EA, Means WJ. 1999. Antioxidant activity of mechanically separated pork extracts. Meat Sci 52: 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00154-5
  13. Suyama M, Hirano T, Suzuki T. 1986. Buffering capacity of free histidine and its related dipeptides in white and dark muscles of yellowfin tuna. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 52: 2171-2175. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.52.2171
  14. Maikhunthod B, Intarapichet K. 2005. Heat and ultrafiltration extraction of broiler meat carnosine and its antioxidant activity. Meat Sci 71: 364-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.017
  15. Gornall AG, Bardawill CJ, David MM. 1949. Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction. J Biol Chem 177: 751-766.
  16. Viollier E, Inglett PW, Hunter K, Roychoudhury AN, Van Cappellen P. 2000. The ferrozine method revisited: Fe(II)/Fe(III) determination in natural waters. Appl Geochem 15: 785-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00097-9
  17. Parker CJ Jr. 1966. Spectrophotometric determination of carnosine and anserine in muscle. Anal Chem 38: 1359-1362. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60242a018
  18. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
  19. Song HS, Lee KT, Kang OJ. 2006. Effects of extraction method on the carnosine, protein, and iron contents of eel (Anguilla japonica) extract. J Korean Fish Soc 39: 384-390.
  20. Heu MS, Choi BD, Kim KH, Kang SI, Kim YJ, Kim JS. 2015. Comparison on the food quality characteristics of muscles from salmonids according to species, imported country, and separated part. Korean J Fish Aquat Soc 48: 16-25.
  21. Lukton A, Olcott HS. 1958. Content of free imidazole compounds in the muscle tissue of aquatic animals. J Food Sci 23: 611-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1958.tb17612.x
  22. Suyama M, Suzuki T, Maruyama M, Saito K. 1970. Determination of carnosine, anserine, and balenine in the muscle of animal. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 36: 1048-1053. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.36.1048
  23. Park CK, Souh SB, Lee EH. 1996. Studies on the extractive nitrogenous constituents of chum salmon, Oncorhynchus keta in Korea. J Korean Fish Soc 29: 51-63.
  24. Igene JO, King JA, Pearson AM, Gray JI. 1979. Influence of heme pigments, nitrite, and nonheme iron on development of warmed-over flavor (WOF) in cooked meat. J Agric Food Chem 27: 838-842. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60224a052
  25. Chen CC, Pearson AM, Gray JI, Fooladi MH, Ku PK. 1984. Some factors influencing the nonheme iron content of meat and its implications in oxidation. J Food Sci 49: 581-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb12473.x

Cited by

  1. 연곡천 하류에서 소상하는 연어(Chum salmon, Oncorhynchus keta)의 이동특성 vol.29, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5322/jesi.2020.29.9.885