DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reinforcement of provisional restoration with cast metal framework: A case report

주조 금속 구조물을 이용하여 강화한 임시보철물 수복 증례

  • Kim, Hyun-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Moon, Yoon-Hee (School of Health Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 김현영 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 문윤희 (단국대학교 보건과학대학) ;
  • 이종혁 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2016.06.02
  • Accepted : 2016.09.12
  • Published : 2017.01.31

Abstract

Provisional restoration plays an important role in the process of restoration with fixed partial denture by providing protection and restoring function and esthetics of abutment tooth. This is especially true in patients requiring use of provisional prosthesis for a long term. However, such situations may lead to higher possibility of provisional prosthesis fracture, and if expected so, reinforcement of provisional prosthesis should be considered. In this article, a patient requiring prosthetic treatment with increase of vertical dimension of occlusion was introduced. Due to increased vertical dimension of occlusion, the provisional restoration was expected to withstand relatively larger amount of load during a relatively long observation period. In order to minimize possible occurrence of fracture, reinforcement of the provisional restoration was sought by insertion of cast-metal framework and by using bis-acryl resin. The reinforced provisional restoration showed satisfactory results during the observation period of 4 months.

임시보철물은 고정성 보철물로의 수복 과정에서 지대치 보호 및 기능과 심미성 회복의 측면에서 중요한 역할을 수행한다. 특히 이를 장착한 상태로 최종 수복 전에 장기간의 관찰이 필요한 환자에서 그 중요성이 더욱 강조되나, 상대적으로 낮은 강도로 인하여 잦은 파절이 발생할 수 있으며 이를 방지하기 위해 강화된 임시보철물의 제작을 고려할 수 있다. 이 문헌에서는 교합 수직 고경의 증가를 필요로 하는 환자의 증례를 소개하고자 하였으며, 수직 고경 증가의 영향으로 임시보철물 사용 시 더 큰 부하의 작용 및 장기간의 사용이 예상되었다. 이에 주조 금속 하부구조물을 첨가하여 bis-acryl 레진으로 강화된 임시보철물을 제작하였으며, 약 4개월의 관찰 기간 동안 만족스러운 결과를 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK; Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2
  2. Moulding MB, Teplitsky PE. Intrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:299-304.
  3. Lui JL, Setcos JC, Phillips RW. Temporary restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1986;11:103-10.
  4. Wang RL, Moore BK, Goodacre CJ, Swartz ML, Andres CJ. A comparison of resins for fabricating provisional fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:173-84.
  5. Willis FM. Features of the face involved in full denture prosthesis. Dental Cosmos 1935;77:851-4.
  6. Turner KA, Missirlian DM. Restoration of the extremely worn dentition. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:467-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90326-3
  7. Abduo J, Lyons K. Clinical considerations for increasing occlusal vertical dimension: a review. Aust Dent J 2012;57:2-10.
  8. Vahidi F. The provisional restoration. Dent Clin North Am 1987;31:363-81.
  9. Emtiaz S, Tarnow DP. Processed acrylic resin provisional restoration with lingual cast metal framework. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:484-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70166-0
  10. Bluche LR, Bluche PF, Morgano SM. Provisional fixed prosthesis reinforced with a metal casting. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:634-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70109-4
  11. Galindo D, Soltys JL, Graser GN. Long-term reinforced fixed provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:698-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70078-2
  12. Verri FR, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JV, de Almeida EO, Antenucci RM. Esthetic interim acrylic resin prosthesis reinforced with metal casting. J Prosthodont 2009;18:541-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00477.x
  13. Binkley CJ, Irvin PT. Reinforced heat-processed acrylic resin provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:689-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90364-7
  14. Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Jones AG. Shear bond strength of bisacryl composite provisional material repaired with flowable composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:47-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00147.x
  15. Hammond BD, Cooper JR 3rd, Lazarchik DA. Predictable repair of provisional restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21:19-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00225.x
  16. Bohnenkamp DM, Garcia LT. Repair of bis-acryl provisional restorations using flowable composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:500-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.017
  17. Lee J, Lee S. Evaluation of add-on methods for bis-acryl composite resin interim restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:594-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.020