대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구 (Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics)

  • 제27권1호
  • /
  • Pages.113-135
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2288-7733(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8357(eISSN)
대한수학교육학회 (The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics)
권호 표지

비판적 수학교육 관점에 따른 수학교과서 분석준거 개발: 전문가 델파이 조사를 중심으로

Delphi Survey to Develop an Analysis Framework for Mathematics Textbooks from a Critical Mathematics Education Perspective

  • 투고 : 2017.01.10
  • 심사 : 2017.02.13
  • 발행 : 2017.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 비판적 수학교육의 관점에서 수학교과서를 분석하기 위한 분석준거 개발을 목표로 하여 이루어졌다. 이를 위한 첫 단계로서 비판적 수학교육의 이론적 근간이 되는 비판 이론과 비판적 교육이론에 대한 문헌분석을 통해 비판적 수학교육의 철학적, 인식론적 기저를 고찰하였다. 또한 비판적 수학교육에 대한 국내외 문헌을 분석하여 비판적 수학교육의 개념화 논의, 실제 수업사례 등을 종합하여 '비판적 수학교육 관점에 따른 수학교과서 분석준거 안'을 구성하였다. 이후 제시한 준거 안에 대한 타당도를 검증하기 위해 전문가 델파이 조사를 실시하였다. 델파이 조사 분석 결과에 따라 제시한 준거 안을 수정, 보완하여 '고전적 지식', '공동체적 지식', '대화적 지식', '정치적 지식' 네 범주로 이루어진 '비판적 수학교육의 관점에 따른 수학교과서 분석준거'를 최종적으로 개발하였다.

The purpose of the research was to develop an analysis framework for Korean mathematics textbooks from a critical mathematics education perspective. For this, we conducted a comprehensive literature review regarding critical theory, critical education, and critical mathematics education. Based on the literature review, we derived a preliminary framework for textbook analysis. To validate the preliminary framework delphi survey was carried out twice with 21 expert panelists in the field of mathematics education and multicultural education. The first delphi survey was conducted with open-ended questions to investigate diverse opinions regarding educational goals, contents, and teaching methods of critical mathematics education. The second delphi survey was conducted with Likert-type scale and it was analyzed using Mean, Contents Validity Ratio, Degree of Consensus. As the result of the whole research procedures, the final analysis framework was developed consisting of four categories: classical knowledge, community knowledge, communicative knowledge, and political knowledge. A development of the analysis framework from a critical mathematics education perspective could give a significant impact on the mathematics curriculum or mathematic teacher education in the Korea and a meaningful initial step for the effort of practicing critical mathematics education. It is expected that this study could not only incite consideration for the better mathematics education but also expand the prospect of research and practice in mathematics education. This study would provide a new paradigm of future mathematics education with which to teach and guide students to become members of world civil society with mathematical power and critical competency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강용주(2008). 델파이 기법의 이해와 적용사례: 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원 수시과제보고서 수시 08-20. 경기: 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원.
  2. 교육과학기술부(2012). 교육과정 총론: 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2012-31호. 서울: 교육과학기술부.
  3. 교육부(2015a). 수학과 교육과정 교육부 고시 제2015-74호. 서울: 교육부.
  4. 교육부(2015b). 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정 시안개발 연구 II. 연구보고서 BD15110002. 서울:교육부
  5. 권오남, 박정숙, 오국환(2013). 비판적 수학교육에 대한 문헌 분석 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈A 수학교육, 52(3), 319-334.
  6. 오국환(2014). 비판적 수학교육을 적용한 수업사례 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  7. 이시용(1997). 비판이론에 관한 고찰. 교육논총, 14, 137-156.
  8. 이종성(2001). 델파이방법. 서울: 교육과학사
  9. 정수용, 주미경, 송륜진(2014). 수학교과서 속 수학자들에 대한 비판적 분석-융합적 협업으로서 다문화교육 관점에서. 교과교육학연구, 18(2), 441-470.
  10. 정영수(1995). 인간교육의 탐구. 서울: 동문사
  11. Apple, M. W. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? power, policy, and practice in mathematics education, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/749562
  12. Apple, M. W. (1995). Taking power seriously: new direction in equity in mathematics education and beyond. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New direction for equity in mathematics education (pp. 329-348). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Bartell, T. G. (2011). Learning to teach mathematics for social justice : negotiating social justice and mathematics goals, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 42, 5-35.
  14. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751231
  15. Bohl, J. V. (1998). Critical mathematics education: An exploration of existing curricular materials. Unpublished master dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  16. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in context of developmental research. Educational Psychologyst, 31, 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265
  17. D'Ambrosio, U. (1997). Ethnomathematics and its place in history and pedagogy of mathematics. In Powell, A. B. & Frankenstein, M. (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: challenging eurocentriwm tin mathematics education (pp. 13-24). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  18. D'Ambrosio, U. (1999). Literacy, matheracy, and technoracy: a trivium for today. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_3
  19. Davis, P. J. (1993). Applied mathematics as social contract. In S. Restivo, J. P. Van Bendegem, & R. Fischer (Eds.), Math worlds: philosophical and social studies of mathematics and mathematics education (pp. 183-194). New York, NY: Free Press.
  20. Ernest, P. (2010). 수학교육철학 (강문봉, 백석윤, 이중권, 장혜원 역), 서울: 경문사. (영어 원작은 1991년 출판)
  21. Frankenstein, M. (1983). Critical mathematics education: an application of Paulo Freire's epistemology. Journal of Education, 165(4), 315-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748316500403
  22. Frankenstein, M. (2012). Beyond math content and process: proposals for underlying aspects of social justice education. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: conversations with educators (pp. 49-62). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  23. Freire, P. (2002). 페다고지. (남경태 역), 서울: 그린비. (영어 원작은 1970년 출판).
  24. Freire, P. (2002). 희망의 교육학. (교육문화연구회 역), 서울: 아침이슬. (영어 원작은 1994년 출판).
  25. Freire, P. (2010). 교육과 의식화. (채광석 역), 서울: 중원문화. (영어 원작은 1973년 출판).
  26. Grant, C. A., & Sleeter, C. E. (2011). Doing multicultural education for achievement and equity, 2nd Ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
  27. Grugnetti, L. & Rogers, L. (2000) Philosophical, multicultural and interdisciplinary issues. In J. Fauvel and J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education. The ICMI study (pp. 39-62). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  28. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, latino school, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034699
  29. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  30. Gutstein, E. (2007). Connecting community, critical, and classical knowledge in teaching mathematics for social justice, The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph 1, 109-118.
  31. Gutstein, E. (2012). Reflections on teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in urban school. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: conversations with educators (pp. 63-78). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  32. Ju, M. K., Moon, J. E., & Song, R. J. (2016). History of mathematics in Korean mathematics textbooks: Implication for using ethnomathematics in culturally diverse school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1321-1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9647-0
  33. Keitel, C. (1993). Implicit mathematical models in social practice and explicit mathematics teaching by applications. In J. de Lange, C. Keitel, I. Huntley, & M. Niss (Eds.), Innovation in maths education by modelling and applications (pp. 19-30). West Sussex, England: Ellis Horwood.
  34. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  35. Powell, A. B. (2012). The historical development of critical mathematics education. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: conversations with educators (pp. 21-34). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  36. Romberg, T. A. (1992). Further thoughts on the standards: a reaction to Apple. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 432-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/749563
  37. Schwab, K. (2016). The 4th industrial revolution. Geneva, Switzland: World Economy Forum.
  38. Skovsmose, O. (1985). Toward a philosophy of critical mathematical education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
  39. Skovsmose, O. (2012). Critical mathematics education: a dialogical journey. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: conversations with educators (pp. 35-47). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  40. Swetz, F. (2000). Mathematical pedagogy: an historical perspective. In V. Katz (Eds.), Using history to teach mathematics: an international perspective (pp. 11-16). Washington D.C.: Mathematical Association of America.
  41. Turner, E. E. (2003). Critical mathematical agency: urban middle school students engage in mathematics to investigate, critique, and act upon their world. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
  42. Wager, A. A. (2008). Developing equitable mathematics pedagogy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  43. Zaslavsky, C. (1996). The multicultural math classroom: bringing in the world. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.