DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Elementary and Middle School Teachers' Perception and Need for the Application of 2015 Revised Science Curriculum

2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 적용에 대한 초·중학교 교사의 인식과 요구

  • Received : 2017.01.23
  • Accepted : 2017.02.20
  • Published : 2017.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate elementary and middle school teachers' perception and the need for the application of 2015 revised science curriculum. Four hundred and sixty-eight elementary school teachers and four hundred and twenty-two middle school teachers were surveyed. The results of the research are as follows. many elementary and middle school teachers responded that major changes in the 2015 revised curriculum were applicable in school science education. However, they expected that the lack of teaching and learning materials, lack of experiment preparation time, and lack of their understanding about how to improve the scientific core competencies and how to use the content system were major difficulties in applying the major changes in the 2015 revised science curriculum. They also thought that teaching and learning materials were needed in order to apply the 2015 revised science curriculum. Based on these results, this study suggested content for teacher training, the role of teachers, and formation of a teacher community.

본 연구의 목적은 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 적용에 대한 초 중학교 교사의 인식과 요구를 조사하는 데에 있다. 이에 초등학교 교사 468명과 중학교 교사 422명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 다수의 초 중학교 교사들은 학교 과학교육에서 2015 개정 교육과정의 주요 변화들이 적용 가능하다고 응답하였다. 그러나 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 주요 변화를 적용하는 과정에서 발생할 것 같은 어려움으로 교사들이 가장 많이 선택한 응답은 각각 교수 학습 자료의 부족, 실험 준비 시간의 부족, 과학 교과 역량 함양 방법이나 내용 체계 활용 방법에 대한 이해 부족이었다. 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정을 적용할 때에 교수 학습 자료가 우선적으로 필요하다고 응답하였다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 교사 연수의 내용, 교사의 역할, 교사 공동체 형성에 대해 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1017
  2. Han, K., & Noh, S. (2003). An analysis on the utilization of teacher’s guides for science in elementary school. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(1), 51-64.
  3. Jeong, E. (2012). A Study on elementary and middle school teachers' perception on the application and quality management plan of science curriculum according to the 2009 revised curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 354-368. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2012.36.2.354
  4. Kweon, J., Chung, W., & Kim, Y. (2001). Teachers' perception and improvement on the elementary science teacher's guide. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 75-90.
  5. Kwon, C. S., & Park, B. T. (2011). The teacher's recognition and utilization for subject of new science teacher's guide in the elementary school. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 21(2), 247-260.
  6. Kwon, J. R., Park, E. A., Kim, H.-K., Lee, M.-K., Song, M.-Y., Bae, Y., & Seo, Y.(2016). Application plans of subject curriculums according to the 2015 revised curriculum: Focusing on Elementary and Middle-schools (RRC 2016-8-1). Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  7. Ministry of Education(MOE) (1997). The school curriculum of the republic of Korea. 1997-15.
  8. Ministry of Education(MOE) (2015a). An announcement of the 2015 revised curriculum (2015 개정 교육과정 총론 및 각론 확정.발표). The press release of Ministry of Education, 2015.9.23.
  9. Ministry of Education(MOE) (2015b). 2015 revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education 2015-74 [issue 9].
  10. Park, H. (2016). A survey on the conditions of middle school science evaluation. Teacher Education Research, 55(3), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.55.3.201609.389
  11. Park, J. H., Kim, J. Y., & Park, Y. R. (2004). Secondary school science teachers’ perceptions of inquiry learning. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 25(8), 731-738.
  12. Park, S.-H., Jeong, Y.-K., Yun, Y.-S., Lee, K.-H., Kim, J.-G., Kim, C.-J., Kim, H.-S., Noh, H.-B., Seo, Y.-S., & Hwang, Y.-S. (2007). A study on the improvement of the national curriculum revision system (RRC 2007-3). Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  13. Rogan, J. M., & Grayson, D. J. (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to science education in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1171-1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145819
  14. Sim, J.-H., Shin, M.-K., & Lee, S.-K. (2010). Science teachers' perception on major features of the 2007 revised science curriculum for class implementation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 30(1), 140-156.
  15. Song, J., & Na, J. (2015). Directions and issues of 2015 national science curriculum and their implications to science classroom culture. The Korean Society for School Science, 9(2), 72-84.
  16. van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum Landscapes and Trends, (pp. 1-10). Springer Netherlands.
  17. Wenger, E, Mcdermott, R. & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Cited by

  1. 뇌기반 진화적 접근법을 적용한 초등학생 수준별 자유탐구 안내자료 개발 및 효과 vol.37, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.3.233
  2. Analysis of the Characteristics of High School Student Research Activities - Focused on the Prize-Winning Works in the Life Science Field of National Science Fair - vol.46, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.3.380
  3. 과학교육과 지속가능발전교육 접목 프로그램이 고등학생의 세계관에 미치는 영향 vol.13, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2020.13.3.253