DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Usage and Storing Conditions on John Deere 3140 Tractor Failures in Khouzestan Province, Iran

  • Afsharnia, Fatemeh (Young Researchers and Elite club, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University) ;
  • Marzban, Afshin (Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan)
  • 투고 : 2017.03.23
  • 심사 : 2017.05.30
  • 발행 : 2017.06.01

초록

The use of tractors to carry out agricultural work has played an important role in mechanizing the agricultural sector. A repairable mechanical system (such as an agricultural tractor) is subject to deterioration or failure. In this study, a regression model was used to predict the failure rate of a John Deere 3140 tractor. The machine failure pattern was carefully studied, and key factors affecting the failure rate were identified in five regions of the Khouzestan province. Through a questionnaire, data was obtained from farm records. This data was grouped into six sub-groups, according to the annual use hours (AUH) and the manner in which the tractors were stored. Results showed that AUH and storage policies affected failure rate slightly. With an increase in the age of the tractors, the failure rate in the tractors used for 1050-2000 hours annually and stored outdoors was higher than those used for 200-1000 hours annually and stored in sheds. When the tractors were of the same age, the slope of the curve in the 200-1000 annual use hours increased gradually and then rapidly, but failure rate in the 1050-2000 annual use hours was high from the beginning, and subsequent increase in this value was almost uniform. As a result, it can be said that with an increase in the annual use hours, the failure and breakdown rate in John Deere 3140 tractors rapidly increases, but maintenance conditions only slightly affect the failure and breakdown rate.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anonymous. 2002. Khouzestan Tourism Climatology. Iran meteorological organization press. Tehran.
  2. Asadi, M. R., Rasekh, M., Golmohammadi, A., Jafari, A., kheiralipour, k. and Borghei, A. M. 2010. Optimization of connecting rod of MF-285 tractor. Journal of Agricultural Technology 6(4):649-662.
  3. Ashtiani, A.R., Ranjbar, I and Toorchi, M. Determining the economic life for three agricultural tractor models in Iran (Case Study:Mazandaran Dasht-e-Naz Farm Company). Journal of Agricultural Sciences Islamic Azad University 12(1):221-230.
  4. Billinton, R. and Allan, R. N. 1992. Reliability evaluation of engineering systems (concepts and techniques). Plenum Press, New York, London. p:453.
  5. Bowers, W. and Hunt, D. 1970. application of mathematical formulas to repair cost. Transactions of the ASAE 13(6):806-809. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.38725
  6. Effati Kalrami, M., Bahrami, H. A. and Darvishi, A. 2012. The Investigation of mineralogical properties of surface soil particles in dust sources (specific study: Khouzestan province, "Hur-Al-Azim lagoon"). The 1st international congress on dust haze and combating its adverse effects. Khouzestan. Iran.
  7. Grisso, R. D. and Pitman, R. 2009. Five strategies for extending machinery life. Extention Engineer, Biological Systems Engineering Department. University of Nebraska, USA: 442-451.
  8. Haj Shirmohammadi, A. 2004. Industrial maintenance planning and control. Ghazal press. 9th edition. pp: 487.
  9. Khob bakht, G., Ahmadi, H. and Akram, A. 2010. Determination of optimum life for MF285 tractor based on repair and maintenance costs: a case study in center region of Iran. Journal of Agriculture Technology 6(4):673-686.
  10. Khodabakhshian Kargar, R., Shakeri, M. and Baradaran motee, J. 2008. Preventive net engineering and control monitoring in the equipement. 5th International Conference on Maintenance.
  11. KHodabakhshian, R. and Shakeri, M. 2011. Prediction of repair and maintenance costs of farm tractors by using of preventive maintenance. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 3(1):39-44. https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-3710.3.1.39-44
  12. Kumar, R. J. and Gross, R. 1977. A study of combine harvester reliability. Transactions of the ASAE 20(1): 30-34. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.35486
  13. M.Say, S., K.Sumer, S. 2011. Failure rate analysis of cereal combined drills. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(6):1322-1329.
  14. Rohani, A., Ranjbar, I., Ajabshir, Y., Abbaspour fard, M. H. and Valizadeh, M. 2009. Prediction of two-wheel drive tractor repair and maintenance costs using artificial neural network in comparing with regression. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 16(special issue 1-a).
  15. Sabir, M. S., Zaidi, M. A. and Sheikh, G. S. 1990. Mathematical model for repair and maintenance costs of agricultural machinery. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 27(1):30-33.
  16. Sonekar, M. M. and Jaju, S.B. 2011. Fracture analysis of exhaust manifold stud of mahindra tractor through finite element method (FEM)-A past review. International Journal of Engineering and Technology 3(2):131-135.
  17. Tufts R. A. 1985. Failure cause, frequency, and repair for forest harvesting equipment. Trans. ASAE 28 (4):1673-1677. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.32497
  18. Vafaee, M. R., Mashhadi Mighani, H., Almasi, M. and Minaee, S. 2009. Determining appropriate calculated method for estimating reliability of JD955 cereal harvester in the Markazi province. Journal of Agricultural 2(2):190-199.
  19. Zarei Mahmoud abady, H. and Dehghan Tezerjani, F. 2012. Investigation of the dust phenomenon and its effects on the agriculture and industry sector in the Yazd-Ardakan plain and providing the environmental management solutions. The 1st international congress on dust haze and combating its adverse effects. Khouzestan. Iran.