DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aluminum and Plastic Heat Exchange Element : A Performance Comparison for Cooling of Telecommunication Cabinet

통신 함체 냉각용 알루미늄과 플라스틱 열교환 소자의 성능 비교

  • Kim, Nae-Hyun (Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Incheon National University)
  • Received : 2017.01.01
  • Accepted : 2017.03.16
  • Published : 2017.06.10

Abstract

Heat generation rate in a telecommunication cabinet increases due to the continued usage of mobile devices. Insufficient removal of heat intensifies the cabinet temperature, resulting in the malfunction of electronic devices. In this study, we assessed both aluminum and plastic heat exchangers used for cooling of the telecommunication cabinet, and compared the results against theoretical predictions. The aluminum heat exchanger was composed of counter flow parallel channels of 4.5 mm pitch, and the plastic heat exchangers were composed of cross flow triangular channels of 2.0 mm pitch. Samples were made by installing two plastic heat exchangers in both series and parallel. Results showed that the heat transfer rate was highest for the series cross flow heat exchanger, and was least for the aluminum heat exchanger. The temperature efficiency of the series cross flow heat exchanger was 59% greater than that of the aluminum heat exchanger, and was 4.3% greater than that of the parallel cross flow heat exchanger. In contrast, the pressure drop of the parallel cross flow heat exchanger was significantly lower than other samples. The heat exchange efficiency was also the largest for the parallel cross flow heat exchanger. The theoretical analysis predicted the temperature efficiency to be within 3.3%, and the pressure drop within 6.1%.

Keywords

References

  1. Schmidt, R. R. and Shaukatullah, H. 2003, Computer and telecommunications equipment room cooling : a review of literature, IEEE Transactions on components and packaging technologies, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAPT.2003.811482
  2. Kang, I.-S., Choi, D.-K., and Kim, T.-Y., 2004, The experimental study on the performance of two-phase loop thermosyphon system for electronic equipment cooling, Trans. B, KSME, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 415-424. https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2004.28.4.415
  3. Jeon, J., Kim, Y., Choi, J.-M., Hyun, D.-S., and Yun, L., 2007, Performance characteristics of liquid cooling heat exchangers with MPCM slurry designed for telecommunication equipment, Korean J. Air-Conditioning Refrigeration Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 710-717.
  4. Kim, Y., Choi, J. M., Kang, H., Yoon, J., Kim, Y., Lee, H., and Choi, K., 2006, Performance characteristics of a hybrid air-conditioner for telecommunication equipment rooms, Korean J. Air-Conditioning Refrigeration Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 874-880.
  5. Personal communication with Korea Tech. Co., 2016, http://www.rittal.com/kr-ko/product/list.action?c=/Coolingunits &categoryPath=/PG0169KLIMA1.
  6. CleanAirNanoTech, 2016, 600 W telecommunication cabinet cooling module equipped with sensible heat. exchanger, Annual Report to KETEP, 2016.
  7. Kim, N.-H., 2015, Performance comparison between indirect evaporative coolers made of aluminum, plastic or plastic/paper, J. Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 8165-8175. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.12.8165
  8. ASHRAE Standard 41.2, 1986. Standard Method for Laboratory Air-Flow Measurement, ASHRAE.
  9. ASHRAE Standard 41.1, 1986, Standard Method for Temperature Measurement, ASHRAE.
  10. KS C 9306, 2002, Air Conditioner.
  11. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 37, 2005, Standard Measurement Guide, Engineering Analysis of Experimental Data, ASHRAE.
  12. Kays, W. M. and London, A. L., 1984, Compact Heat Exchangers, McGraw-Hill Pub.
  13. Petukhov, B. S., 1970, Heat transfer and friction in turbulent pipe flow with variable physical properties, Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 6, eds., J. P. Hartnett and T. F. Irvine, Academic Press, New York.
  14. Gnielinski, V., 1976, New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow, Int. Chemical Engineering, Vol. 16, pp. 359-368.