DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The restricted maximum likelihood estimation of a censored regression model

  • 투고 : 2017.02.18
  • 심사 : 2017.04.02
  • 발행 : 2017.05.31

초록

It is well known in a small sample that the maximum likelihood (ML) approach for variance components in the general linear model yields estimates that are biased downward. The ML estimate of residual variance tends to be downwardly biased. The underestimation of residual variance, which has implications for the estimation of marginal effects and asymptotic standard error of estimates, seems to be more serious in some limited dependent variable models, as shown by some researchers. An alternative frequentist's approach may be restricted or residual maximum likelihood (REML), which accounts for the loss in degrees of freedom and gives an unbiased estimate of residual variance. In this situation, the REML estimator is derived in a censored regression model. A small sample the REML is shown to provide proper inference on regression coefficients.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Hanshin University

참고문헌

  1. Amemiya T (1984). Tobit models: a survey, Journal of Econometrics, 24, 3-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(84)90074-5
  2. Amemiya T (1985). Tobit models. In T Amemiya (Ed), Advanced Econometrics (pp. 360-411), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  3. Bilias Y, Chen S, and Ying Z (2000). Simple resampling methods for censored regression quantiles, Journal of Econometrics, 99, 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00042-7
  4. Efron B and Hinkley DV (1978). Assessing the accuracy of the maximum likelihood estimator: observed versus expected information, Biometrika, 65, 457-482. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/65.3.457
  5. Green W (2004). The behaviour of maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects, Econometric Journal, 7, 98-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2004.00123.x
  6. Henningsen A (2017). Estimating censored regression models in R using the censReg packages, Retrieved May 4, 2017, from: http://cran.r-project.org/package=censReg
  7. Hughes JP (1999). Mixed effects models with censored data with application to HIV RNA levels, Biometrics, 55, 625-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00625.x
  8. Kleiber C and Zeileis A (2009). AER: applied econometrics with R, R package version 1.1, Retrieved May 4, 2017, from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AER
  9. Lee SC and Choi BS (2013). Bayesian interval estimation of Tobit regression model, The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 26, 737-746. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2013.26.5.737
  10. Lee SC and Choi B (2014). A comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood estimations in a SUR Tobit regression model, Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 27, 991-1002. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2014.27.6.991
  11. Lee L (2017). NADA: nondetects and data analysis for environmental data, Retrieved May 4, 2017, from: http://cran.r-project.org/package=NADA
  12. Mroz TA (1987). The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women's hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions, Econometrica, 55, 765-799. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911029
  13. Noh M and Lee Y (2007). REML estimation for binary data in GLMMs, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 98, 896-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2006.11.009
  14. Patterson H and Thomson R (1971). Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal, Biometrika, 58, 545-554. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.3.545
  15. Tobin J (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables, Econometrica, 26, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382
  16. Yu K and Stander J (2007). Bayesian analysis of a Tobit quantile regression model, Journal of Econometrics, 137, 260-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.10.002
  17. Wooldridge JM (2009). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason.