Environmental Engineering Research

  • 제22권2호
  • /
  • Pages.141-148
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-1025(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-968X(eISSN)
대한환경공학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of kinetics behavior of electrocoagulation process for the removal of suspended solids and metals from synthetic water

  • Singh, Hariraj (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad) ;
  • Mishra, Brijesh Kumar (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad)
  • 투고 : 2016.02.18
  • 심사 : 2016.10.17
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Globalization, industrialization, mining, and uncontrolled population growth have fostered a shortage of potable water. Therefore, it has become imperative to understand an effective and reasonable water purification technique. A renewed interest in electrocoagulation (EC) has been spurred by the search for reliable, cost-effective, water-treatment processes. This paper has elucidated a technical approach for getting rid of heavy metals and total suspended solids (TSS) from synthetic water using an aluminum electrode. The effect of operational parameters, such as current density, inter-electrode distance, operating time, and pH, were studied and evaluated for maximum efficiency. This study corroborates the correlation between current density and removal efficiency. Neutral pH and a low electrode gap have been found to aid the efficacy of the EC setup. The outcome indicates that a maximum TSS removal efficiency of 76.6% occurred at a current density of $5.3mA/cm^2$ during a contact time of 30 min. In the case of heavy metals remediation, 40 min of process time exhibited extremely reduced rates of 99%, 59.2%, and 82.1%, for Cu, Cr, and Zn, respectively. Moreover, kinetic study has also demonstrated that pollutants removal follows first-and second-order model with current density and EC time being dependent.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Valipour M. Drainage, waterlogging, and salinity. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2014;60:1625-1640. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.905676
  2. Valipour M. Future of agricultural water management in Africa. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2015;61:907-927. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.961433
  3. Rajeshwar K, Ibanez J, Swain GM. Electrochemistry and the environment. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1994;24:1077-1091.
  4. Aji B, Yavuz Y, Koparal AS. Electrocoagulation of heavy metals containing model wastewater using monopolar iron electrodes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012;86:248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.11.011
  5. Mansoorian HJ, Mahvi AH. Removal of lead and zinc from battery industry wastewater using electrocoagulation process: Influence of direct and alternating current by using iron and stainless steel rod electrodes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014;135: 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.08.012
  6. Kobya M, Can OT, Bayramoglu M. Treatment of textile wastewaters by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrodes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2003;100:163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00102-X
  7. Heidmann I, Calmano W. Removal of Zn(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Ag(I) and Cr(VI) present in aqueous solutions by aluminium electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;152:934-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.068
  8. Mouedhen G, Feki M, De Petris Wery M, Ayedi HF. Behavior of aluminum electrodes in electrocoagulation process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;150:124-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.090
  9. Akbal F, Camci S. Comparison of electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation for heavy metal removal. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2010;33:1655-1664. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000091
  10. Ferreira ADM, Marchesiello M, Thivel PX. Removal of copper, zinc and nickel present in natural water containing $Ca^{2+}$ and $HCO^{-3}$ ions by electrocoagulation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013;107:109-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.01.016
  11. Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri LS. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington D.C.: APHA/AWWA/WPCF; 2012.
  12. Shannag MA, Qodah KA, Melhem KB, Qtaishat MR, Alkasrawi M. Heavy metal ions removal from metal plating wastewater using electrocoagulation: Kinetic study and process performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2015;260:749-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.035
  13. Bukhari AA. Investigation of the electro-coagulation treatment process for the removal of total suspended solids and turbidity from municipal wastewater. Bioresource Technol. 2008;99: 914-921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.015
  14. Adhoum N, Monser L, Bellakhal N, Belgaied J. Treatment of electroplating wastewater containing $Cu^{2+}$, $Zn^{2+}$ and Cr(VI) by electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004;112:207-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.04.018
  15. Chou WL, Wang CT, Chang CP. Comparison of removal of Acid Orange 7 by electrooxidation using various anode materials. Desalination 2011;266:201-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.08.027
  16. Bazrafshan E, Mahvi AH, Zazouli MA. Removal of zinc and copper from aqueous solutions by electrocoagulation technology using iron electrodes. Asian J. Chem. 2011;23:5506-5510.
  17. Chen G, Chen PX, Yue L. Electrocoagulation and electroflotation of restaurant wastewater. J. Environ. Eng. 2000;126:858-863. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:9(858)
  18. Drouichea N, Aoudj S, Lounici H, Drouiche M, Ouslimane T, Ghaffour N. Fluoride removal from pretreated photovoltaic wastewater by electrocoagulation: An investigation of the effect of operational parameters. Proced. Eng. 2012;33:385-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1218
  19. Gures A, Yalcin M, Dogar C. Electrocoagulation of some reactive dyes: A statistical investigation of some electrochemical variables. Waste Manage. 2002;22:491-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00015-6
  20. Daneshvar N, Sorkhabi HA, Kasiri MB. Decolorization of dye solution containing Acid Red 14 by electrocoagulation with a comparative investigation of different electrode connections. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004;112:55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.03.021
  21. Ghosh D, Solanki H, Purkait MK. Removal of Fe(II) from tap water by electrocoagulation technique. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;155:135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.042
  22. Meunier N, Drogui P, Gourvenec C, Mercier G, Hausler R, Blais JF. Removal of metals in leachate from sewage sludge using electrochemical technology. Environ. Technol. 2004;25:235-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330409355457
  23. Mollah MYA, Morkovsky P, Gomes JAG, Kesmez M, Parga J, Cocke DL. Fundamentals, present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004;114:199-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.009
  24. Holt PK, Barton GW, Mitchell CA. The future for electrocoagulation as a localised water treatment technology. Chemosphere 2005;59:355-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.023
  25. Can OT, Kobya M, Demirbas E, Bayramoglu M. Treatment of the textile wastewater by combined electrocoagulation. Chemosphere 2006;62:181-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.022
  26. Merzouk B, Gourich B, Sekki A, Madani K, Chibane M. Removal turbidity and separation of heavy metals using electrocoagulation- electro flotation technique : A case study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;164:215-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.144
  27. Solak M, Kilic M, Huseyin Y, Sencan A. Removal of suspended solids and turbidity from marble processing wastewaters by electrocoagulation: Comparison of electrode materials and electrode connection systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;172:345-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.018
  28. Verma SK, Khandegar V, Saroha AK. Removal of chromium from electroplating industry effluent using electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Toxic. Radio. Waste 2013;17:146-152. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000170
  29. Dermentzis K, Christoforidis A, Valsamidou E. Removal of nickel, copper, zinc and chromium from synthetic andindustrial wastewater by electrocoagulation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2011;1:697-710.
  30. Kashefi Asl M, Moshtaghib M, Hassani AH. Efficiency evaluation of electrocoagulation process for removal of chromium (heavy metal) from municipal and industrial wastewater. Indian J. Sci. Res. 2014;7:1258-1268.
  31. Zewail TM, Yousef NS. Chromium ions ($Cr^{6+}$ & $Cr^{3+}$) removal from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation using vertical expanded Fe anode. J. Electr. Chem. 2014;735:123-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2014.09.002
  32. Mohora E, Roncevic S, Dalmacija B, et al. Removal of natural organic matter and arsenic from water by electrocoagulation/ flotation continuous flow reactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012;235:257-264.
  33. Modirshahla N, Behnajadya MA, Mohammadi SA. Investigation of the effect of different electrodes and their connections on the removal efficiency of 4-nitrophenol from aqous solution by electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;154:778-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.120
  34. Beverskogt B, Puigdomenech I. Revised pourbaix diagrams for zinc at 25-$300^{\circ}C$. Corrosion Sci. 1997;39:107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(97)89246-3

피인용 문헌

  1. Removing nitrogenous compounds from landfill leachate using electrochemical techniques vol.24, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.112
  2. A Review of Promising Electrocoagulation Technology for the Treatment of Wastewater vol.9, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2019.91009
  3. Treatment of CNC industry wastewater by electrocoagulation technology: an application through response surface methodology vol.100, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2019.1628955