수산해양교육연구 (Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education)

  • 제29권3호
  • /
  • Pages.719-731
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-8999(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2049(eISSN)
한국수산해양교육학회 (The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국의 초등 과학 교과서 생명영역에 나오는 탐구 주제 및 생물 재료에 대한 초등 예비교사들의 인식 분석

The Analysis of Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Perception on Biology Inquiry Subjects, and biology Materials in the Korea Elementary School Science Textbook

  • 투고 : 2017.03.06
  • 심사 : 2017.03.29
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The aim of this study was to analyze a group of pre-service elementary teachers experience on the cognitive terms of biology inquiry subjects, and experience on living materials related with the domain of life in the Korea elementary school science textbook. Firstly, elementary school pre-service teachers had the confidence of inquiry subjects related with the domain of life such as 'when we take breath what will happen in human body?' and 'Can we make the model of human body?' But they did have the most diffidence of 'The search for pieris rapae, a cabbage butterfly's life', 'Can we grow the little creature?' The reason why pre-service elementary teachers had diffidence of comprehending experiment procedure and planning ability was that 'they focused on understanding the scientific concepts instead of planning experiments by themselves', and 'they carried out the least amount of experiments' Secondly, elementary school pre-service teachers had never experienced biology materials related with the domain of life in the Korea elementary school biology science textbook such as 'tradescantia reflexa', 'Caddis larva', 'hydrilla verticillata', and 'Plantain lily.' According to the findings obtained from the study, the reason why they had never seen the biology materials was that they had the least opportunity of immediately observing life creatures due to memorization-intensive classes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Atav E. & Altunoglu, B. D.(2010). Pre-service teachers' views about their competencies in biology applications. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 7(1), 37-46.
  2. Baumgartner, E.(2010). Thinking outside the kit: building preservice science teachers' inquiry skills with an experiment that doesn't go as planned. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(1). 54-57.
  3. Byeon, H. & Bail, M.(2008). An international comparative study of 'experiment' presentation of science textbooks of korea, japan, and china. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 20(3), 473-486.
  4. Costu, B..Ayas, A..Calk, M..Unal, S. & Karatas, F. O.(2005). Determining preservice science teachers' competencies in preparing solution an in use of laboratory tools. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(1), 65-72.
  5. Cuevas, P..Lee, O..Hart, J. & Deakor, R.(2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20053
  6. Dickerson, D..Clark, M..Dawkins, K., & Horne. C.(2006). Using science kits to construct content understanding in elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(1). 43-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03170653
  7. Hashweh, M. Z.(1985). An exploratory study of teacher knowledge and teaching: The effects of science teachers' knowledge of subject-matter and their conceptions of learning on their teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, California USA.
  8. Jeanpierre, B.(2006). What teachers report about their inquiry practices. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03170654
  9. Jeong, E. & Hong, M.(2004). An analysis of the problems of experiment and observation in elementary science instruction. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(4), 287-296.
  10. Kim, D.(2014). An analysis of students' systemic thinking and teachers' reflective thinking after the lesson of digestion, circulation, respiration and excretion of middle school science. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 26(2), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2014.26.2.401
  11. Kim, Y.(2017). A Comparative study of illustration on the grade 5 and 6 science textbook in elementary school between the 2007 curriculum and 2009 revised curriculum. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 29(1), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2017.29.1.80
  12. Kim, Y. & Lee, O.(2004). A study on the understanding of elementary school students, preliminary teachers, and teachers about the experimental apparatus. Science Education Research, 29(1), 207-226.
  13. Lee, S..Choi, H..Lim, J. & Shin, S.(2011). A study on the manual skills of experimental apparatuses of preservice elementary school teachers. Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2011.35.1.80
  14. MEST(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology)(2011). Science curriculum. Seoul, South Korea.
  15. Mihladiz, G. & Timur, B.(2011). PreService science teachers views of in-service science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, Jan(Special Issue), 89-100.
  16. Moon, K. & Kim, Y.(2008). Secondary school students' understanding and performance of experiments on photosynthesis and respiration. Biology Education, 36(4), 537-554. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2008.36.4.537
  17. Moore, R.(2003). Reexamining the field experiences of preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102238656
  18. Park, H..Min, B. & Jeong, D.(2008). Laboratory abilities to carry-out experimentations of matter in the middle school science texts. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 28(8), 870-879.
  19. Park, H..Jeong, D..Noh, S..Lim, H..Han, J. & Park, J.(2009). Identification of secondary chemistry teachers' ability to carry-out experimentation. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 53(6), 765-773. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2009.53.6.765
  20. Park, S.(2014). An analysis on elementary school teachers' concern on open inquiry in science education. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 26(1), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2014.26.1.134
  21. Supovitz, J. A. & Turner. H. M.(2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37(9), 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0
  22. Windschitl, M. & Thompson, J.(2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigations: The impact of preservice instruction on understandings of model-based inquiry. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783-835. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043004783
  23. Yeo, S., & Lee, B.(2004). Elementary students', and pre-service and in-service elementary school teachers' understanding on the name and use of labware. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(1), 45-50.
  24. Zembel-Saul, C..Munford, D..Crawford, B., Friedrichsen, P. & Land. S.(2002). Scaffolding preservice science teachers' evidence-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection. Research in Science Education. 32(4). 437-463. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022411822951