Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회지)

Korean Society of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality characteristics of domestic and imported commercial plain wheat flour

시판 우리밀과 수입밀 중력 밀가루의 품질 특성 비교

  • Kwak, Han Sub (Research Group of Cognition and Sensory Perception, Korea Food Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Mi Jeong (Research Group of Cognition and Sensory Perception, Korea Food Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Hoon (Research Group of Smart Food Distribution System, Korea Food Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Sang Sook (Research Group of Cognition and Sensory Perception, Korea Food Research Institute)
  • 곽한섭 (한국식품연구원 감각인지연구단) ;
  • 김미정 (한국식품연구원 감각인지연구단) ;
  • 김훈 (한국식품연구원 스마트유통시스템연구단) ;
  • 김상숙 (한국식품연구원 감각인지연구단)
  • Received : 2017.01.18
  • Accepted : 2017.03.08
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties of domestic and imported commercial plain wheat flour and dough. Four types of domestic wheat flour (DW; DW1-4) were compared to four types of imported wheat flour (IW; IW1-4). DWs exhibited lower moisture content, lightness (L), and whiteness, and higher protein content, redness (a), and yellowness (b), than those exhibited by IWs. Solvent retention capacity of DWs and IWs was similar; however, DWs showed higher gluten performance index. Pasting properties, analyzed by rapid visco analyzer (RVA), were similar for DW1, DW2, and IWs; however, DW3 and DW4 showed different RVA patterns. Considering that DW3 and DW4 were organic wheat flour, possible incorporation of damaged kernel might increase amylase activities resulting in decreased peak viscosity. Dough resistance (108.4-159.9 g) and extensibility (11.8-16.7 mm) of IWs were higher than those of DWs (78.0-118.7 g, 8.7-12.5 mm, respectively).

제면용으로 사용되는 시판 우리밀과 수입밀 중력 밀가루의 품질 특성을 비교하였다. 우리밀은 수분함량, 명도(L), 백도에서 수입밀보다 낮았으며, 단백질 함량, 적색도(a), 청색도(b)에서 높았다. 통밀제품인 DW2와 DW4는 0.71%의 회분 함량을 보여, 0.34-0.42%인 다른 밀가루 시료보다 높았으나, 미국 및 캐나다에서 시판되는 통밀가루의 회분 함량(1.5%)에 비해 크게 낮았다. 통밀가루에 대한 국내 규격이 없어 시판 국내산 통밀가루는 소비자들이 생각하는 통밀가루와 다른 제품임을 보여주었으며, 국내 통밀가루 규격 설정의 필요성을 보여주고 있다. SRC는 우리밀과 수입밀 특성간 큰 차이는 없었으나, GPI에서 우리밀이 0.62-0.71로 수입밀의 0.48-0.62보다 높았다. 수분흡수지수는 우리밀이 1.65-1.75, 수입밀이 1.69-1.74로 유사한 것으로 나타났다. 수용성 고형분 함량과 관련 있는 수분용해지수는 우리밀이 5.82-6.37로 수입밀의 4.94-5.27보다 높아 우리밀의 수용성 고형분 함량이 높을 것으로 생각된다. 수입밀가루와 우리밀 DW1은 유사한 점도 특성을 보였으며, 통밀제품인 DW2는 약간 낮은 점도를 보였으나 전반적인 점도 특성 경향은 유사하였다. 밀가루 점도 특성에서 유기농 밀가루인 DW3과 DW4에서 다른 밀가루 시료와 다른 점도 특성을 보여주었다. 이는 유기농 재배로 인하여, 재배과정 및 수확 후 저장 과정에 있어서 병해충에 의한 원곡의 손상으로 amylase 활성이 증가하여 점도 특성이 낮게 나타난 것으로 추측된다. DSC에 의한 상변이 특성에서는 우리밀이 호화개시온도가 약 $1^{\circ}C$ 정도 높은 것을 제외하고는 수입밀과 차이는 없었다. 패리노그래프에 의한 밀가루 반죽 특성은 우리밀과 수입밀 시료 간에 큰 편차를 보였다. 우리밀의 DW3의 경우 $SOD_{20}$의 강도가 80 F.U.로 좋은 밀가루라 판단되는 75 F.U. 이하 값보다 높았다. TA를 이용한 밀가루 반죽의 저항성(우리밀: 78.0-118.7 g, 수입밀: 108.4-159.9 g)과 신장성(우리밀: 8.7-12.5 mm, 수입밀: 11.8-16.7 mm)의 경우 수입 밀가루 시료가 높았다. 우리밀가루에 비해 수입밀가루의 낮은 단백질 함량에도 불구하고, 수입밀 반죽의 높은 신장성과 저항성은 수입밀의 단백질 및 글루텐의 우수한 품질에 기인하였다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. MAFRA. Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Statistics Yearbook. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong, Korea. pp. 294-307 (2016)
  2. Kim KH, Kang CS, Seo YW, Woo SH, Heo MR, Choo BK, Lee CK, Park KG, Park CS. Current regional cultural situation and evaluation of grain characteristics of Korean wheat II. Grain characteristics collected in domestic wheat cultivar grown in Korea. Korea J. Crop Sci. 58: 239-252 (2013) https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2013.58.3.239
  3. Jin HY, Kim BY. Analysis for consumers' opinion regarding domestic wheat bread. J. Con. Pol. Stud. 40: 205-222 (2011)
  4. Shin GM. Cereal and Baking Science of Technology. Kimoonsa, Seoul, Korea. pp. 170-185 (2008)
  5. Kang CS, Park KS, Park JC, Kim HS, Cheong YK, Kim JG, Park CS. Flour and end-use quality of "Charmdlerak" wheat, a Korean wheat. Korean J. Food Preserv. 15: 219-224 (2008)
  6. Park SY, Park KS, Im MH, Choi H, Chang MI, Kwon CH, Kim SG, Lee HK, Hong MK, Shim JH, Kim JH. Studies for the processing factors of pesticides during the milling of wheat grain. Korean J. Pest. Sci. 13: 70-78 (2009)
  7. Kim HY, Oh MS. Comparisons of bread making properties using domestic and imported flour and quality change during storage. Korean J. Dietary Cult. 16: 27-32 (2001)
  8. Park NK, Song JC, Kim KJ, Lee CK, Jeong HS, Chung MJ. Noodle-making characteristics of Korean wheat. Korean J. Postharvest Sci. Technol. 6: 167-172 (1999)
  9. Park DJ, Ku KH, Kim CJ, Lee SJ, Yang JL, Kim YH, Kim CT. Quality characteristics of Korean wheat noodle by formulation of foreign wheat flour and starch. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 32: 67-74 (2003) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2003.32.1.067
  10. Kang CS, Park CS, Park JC, Kim HS, Cheong YK, Kim KH, Kim KJ, Park KH and Kim JG. Flour characteristics and end-use quality of Korean wheat cultivars I. Flour characteristics. Korean J. Breed Sci. 42: 61-74 (2010)
  11. Kim ML. Functional properties of Brassica oleracea L. extracts and quality characteristics of Korean wheat noodles with Brassica oleracea L. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 34: 1443-1449 (2005) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2005.34.9.1443
  12. Kim ML. Sensory characteristics of Korean wheat noodles with pine pollen and antioxidant activities of pine pollen extracts. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 21: 717-724 (2005)
  13. Park KT, Kim MY, Chun SS. Quality characteristics of Korean wheat wet noodles with pomegranate cortex powder. Korean J. Culinary Res. 15: 128-136 (2009)
  14. Jang HR, Park Js, Shin S, Shin GM. Flour characteristics and end-use quality of commercial flour produced from Korean wheat and imported wheat. Korean J. Food Preserv. 15: 884-890 (2008)
  15. Kim YJ, Ju JC, Kim RY, Kim WT, Park JH, Chun SS. Cooking quality of fresh pasta with concentrated Korean wheat semolina. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 40: 1017-1024 (2011) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.7.1017
  16. Kim YJ, Ju JC, Kim RY, Kim WT, Park JH, Chun SS. Cooking properties of fresh pasta using Korean wheat and drum rimachinata. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 40: 1174-1481 (2011)
  17. Kim SS, Chung HY. Comparison of quality analyses of domestic and imported wheat flour products marketed in Korea. Korean J. Food Nutr. 27: 287-293 (2014) https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2014.27.2.287
  18. AACC. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 10th ed. Methods 32-07, 44-15A, 46-12, 54-21, 56-11A, 76-21, 82-23. The American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA (2000)
  19. Duyvejonck AE, Lagrain B, Pareyt B, Courtin CM, Delcour JA. Relative contribution of wheat flour constituents to solvent retention capacity profiles of European wheats. J Cereal Sci. 53: 312-318 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2011.01.014
  20. Kweon M, Slade L, Levine H. Solvent Retention Capacity (SRC) Testing of Wheat Flour: Principles and value in predicting flour functionality in different wheat-based food processes and in wheat breeding-A review. Cereal Chem. 88: 537-552 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-07-11-0092
  21. Anderson RA. Water absorption and solubility and amylograph characteristics of roll-cooked small grain products. Cereal Chem. 59: 265-269 (1982)
  22. Lund D. Influence of time, temperature, moisture, ingredients and processing conditions on starch gelatinization. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 20: 249-273 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398409527391
  23. Barros F, Alviola JN, Tilley M, Chen YR, Pierucci VRM, Rooney LW. Predicting hot-press wheat tortilla quality using flour, dough and gluten properties. J. Cereal Sci. 52: 288-294 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2010.06.009
  24. Hwang SY. Cereal processing. JinRo Publishing, Co., Seoul, Korea. pp. 155-157 (2010)
  25. Doblado-Maldonado AF, Pike OA, Sweley JC, Rose DJ. Key issues and challenges in whole wheat flour milling and storage. J. Cereal Sci. 56: 119-126 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2012.02.015
  26. Shin SN, Kim SK. Physicochemical properties of Korean raw noodle flours. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 37: 418-424 (2005)
  27. Cheong G. Quality characteristics of Korean wheat flour and imported wheat flour. Korean J. Comm. Living Sci. 12: 23-27 (2001)
  28. Guttieri MJ, Becker C, Souza EJ. Application of wheat meal solvent retention capacity tests within soft wheat breeding populations. Cereal Chem. 81: 261-266 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2004.81.2.261
  29. Mason WR, Hoseney RC. Factors affecting the viscosity of extrusion-cooked wheat starch. Cereal Chem. 63: 436-441 (1986)
  30. Ding QB, Ainsworth P, Tucker G, Marson H. The effect of extrusion conditions on the physicochemical properties and sensory characteristics of rice-based expanded snacks. J. Food Eng. 66: 283-289 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.03.019
  31. Della Valle G, Colonna P, Patria A, Vergnes B. Influence of amy lose content on the viscous behavior of low hydrated molten starches. J. Rheol. 40: 347-362 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550747
  32. Robin F, Theoduloz C, Gianfrancesco A, Pineau N, Schuchmann HP, Palzer S. Starch transformation in bran-enriched extruded wheat flour. Carbohydr. Poly. 85: 65-74 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.01.051
  33. Franco OL, Rigden DJ, Melo FR, Grossi-de-Sa MF. Plant ${\alpha}$-amylase inhibitors and their interaction with insect ${\alpha}$-amylases. Eur. J. Biochem. 269: 397-412 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02656.x
  34. Pueyo JJ, Morgan TD, Ameenuddin N, Liang C, Reeck GR, Chrispeels MJ, Kramer KJ. Effects of bean and wheat ${\alpha}$-amylase inhibitors on ${\alpha}$-amylase activity and growth of stored product insect pests. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 75: 237-244 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1995.tb01932.x
  35. Juhasz R, Gergely S, Gelencser T, Salgo A. Relationship between NIR spectra and RVA parameters during wheat germination. Cereal Chem. 82: 488-493 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1094/CC-82-0488
  36. John A, Shastri PN. Studies on food macromolecules by differential scanning calorimetry: a critical appraisal. J Food Sci. Technol. 35: 1-14 (1998)
  37. Dexter JE, Preston KR, Martin DG, Gander EJ. The effects of protein content and starch damage on the physical dough properties and bread-making quality of Canadian durum wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 20: 139-151 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1994.1054
  38. Khatkar BS, Bell AE, Schofield JD. The dynamic rheological properties of glutens and gluten sub-fractions from wheats of good and poor bread making quality. J. Cereal Sci. 22: 29-44 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-5210(05)80005-0
  39. Kwak HS, Kim TJ, Joo EY, Cha JH, Kim AJ, Kim MJ, Kim SS. Quality variation of domestic wheat compared to imported wheat depending on harvest year. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 46: 146-151 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2017.46.1.146