DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the establishment of isolation distances for environmental release of biotech crops

  • Lee, Bumkyu (Department of Environment Science & Biotechnology, Jeonju University)
  • Received : 2017.03.24
  • Accepted : 2017.05.02
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Biotech crops can only be commercialized after they receive safety approvals, which require thorough risk assessments of their release to the environment. Environmental release experiments are indispensable for environmental risk assessments, and each country has been preparing its own regulations for the safety management of experiments on the environmental release of biotech crops in confined fields. In this study, we compared and analyzed the safety management regulations of the environmental release of biotech crops in Korea, USA, Japan, European Union, and China. Each country had safety management regulations for the environmental release of biotech crops, and these regulations were generally not much different from the Korean regulations. However, there was a difference amongst the USA, Japan, and China in regulations for isolation distances to prevent gene diffusion through pollen-flow during environmental release experiments of biotech crops. In order to establish the isolation distance regulation suitable for the Korean environment, relevant data were collected and presented. For setting the isolation distance for environment release of biotech crops, it is suggested to refer to the isolation distance information provided in the Guidance of Seed Management in Korea. The results of this study are expected to help establish the safety management of biotech crops in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. An JH, Cho KH. 2009. Temporal and spatial characteristics in the pollen flow of living modified rice. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 54:210-217. [in Korean]
  2. Bae HK, Oo MM, Jeon JE, Tien DN, Oh SA, Oh SD, Kweon SJ, Eun MY, Park SK. 2014. Evaluation of gene flow from GM to non-GM rice. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology 1:162-170.
  3. Chun YJ, Kim DI, Park KW, Kim HJ, Jeong SC, An JH, Cho KH, Back K, Kim HM, Kim CG. 2011. Gene flow from herbicide-tolerant GM rice and the heterosis of GM rice-weed F2 progeny. Planta 233:807-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1339-y
  4. Halsey ME. 2006. Integrated confinement system for genetically engineered plants. Donald Danforth Plant Science Center.
  5. Han SM, Kim YT, Won OJ, Choi KH, Rho YH, Park KW. 2016. The importation of genetically modified crops and its environmental impacts in Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:215-220. https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160024
  6. Han SM, Lee B, Won OJ, Hwang KS, Suh SJ, Kim CG, Park KW. 2015. Gene flow from herbicide resistant genetically modified rice to conventional rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Journal of Ecology and Environment 38:397-403. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.042
  7. IFOAM. 2015. Preventing GMO contamination. I foam EU group.
  8. James C. 2016. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops:2015. ISAAA.
  9. Kim CG, Kim DI, Kim HJ, Park JY, Lee B, Park KW, Jeong SC, Cho KH, An JH, Cho KH, Kim YS, Kim HM. 2009a. Assessment of gene flow from genetically modified anthracnose-resistant chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to a conventional crop. Journal of Plant Biology 52:251-258. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-009-9025-y
  10. Kim CG, Park KW, Lee B, Kim DI, Park JY, Kim HJ, Park JE, An JH, Cho KH, Jeong SC, Choi KH, Harn JH, Kim HM. 2009b. Gene flow from genetically modified to conventional chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Science 176:406-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.12.012
  11. Kim D. 2014. Development of techniques and protocols for risk assessments of gene flow from LM crops to its relatives in Korea. NIE. [in Korean]
  12. Ko EM, Kim DY, Kim HJ, Chung YS, Kim CG. 2016. Assessing weediness of herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:560-566. [in Korean]
  13. Lee B, Kang HG, Ra NR, Sun HJ, Kown YI, Song IJ, Kim CG, Ryu TH, Park KW, Lee HY. 2014a. Development of distinction methods for male-sterile and dwarfism herbicide tolerant Zoysia japonica Steud . Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 41:187-191. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2014.41.3.187
  14. Lee B, Kim JH, Sohn SI, Kweon SJ, Chung YS, Lee SM. 2015. Influence of insect pollinators on gene transfer from GM to non-GM soybeans. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 42:159-165. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2015.42.3.159
  15. Lee B, Park KW, Kim CG, Kang HG, Sun HJ, Kown YI, Song IJ, Ryu TH, Lee HY. 2014b. Environmental monitoring of herbicide tolerant genetically modified zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica) around confined field trials. Weed and Turfgrass Science 3:305-311. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5660/WTS.2014.3.4.305
  16. Lee B., Suh S. 2011. A study on the trends and biosafety assessment of genetically modified crops. Research of Environmental Law 33:1-25. [in Korean]
  17. NIAS. 2016. GMO Q&A. National Institute of Agricultural Science. [in Korean]
  18. Oh SD, Lee BK, Park SY, Yun DW, Sohn SI, Chang A, Suh SJ. 2016a. Acute toxicity evaluation of drought-tolerant transgenic rice Agb0103 to Daphnia magna. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:205-214. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160023
  19. Oh SD, Yun DW, Sohn SI, Lee BK, Lee KJ, Chang A. 2016b. Environmental risk assessment and evaluation of vitamin E enhanced transgenic soybean : Responses of Daphnia magna fed on vitamin E enhanced transgenic soybean. Journal of Korean Society of International Agriculture 28:197-204. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2016.28.2.197
  20. Snow AA, Moran-Palma P. 1997. Commercialization of transgenic plants: Potential ecological risks. BioScience 47:86-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313019
  21. Traynor PL, Frederick R, Koch M. 2002. Biosafety and risk assessment in agricultural biotechnology. Michigan State University.

Cited by

  1. Effects of insect-resistant genetically modified rice (Bt-9) cultivation on non-target insect diversity vol.45, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20180009
  2. Influence of Vitamin A-enhanced Transgenic Soybean Cultivation on the Diversity of Insects in LMO Quarantine Fields vol.52, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9787/kjbs.2020.52.4.310