DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of an Official Development Assistance (ODA) project: Focus on a forest recreation and eco-tourism site in Indonesia

  • Choi, Jaeyong (Department of Environment & Forest Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hyuk (Institute of Agricultural Science, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Hwang, Byeol (Department of Environment & Forest Resources, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2017.03.17
  • Accepted : 2017.05.23
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

This study is the evaluation of the 'Tunak forest recreation and ecotourism development project' which will be completed in 2018 with sole source of funding from Korea. A survey was conducted to evaluate the status of the project being carried out in Lombok island, Indonesia, through the evaluation principles and criteria of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Survey participants were stakeholders of the Official Development Assistance (ODA) project and local residents. Overall, the respondents had a good impression of this ODA project and expected they would contribute to the development of their community and region. However, respondents were not well aware of the ODA project being carried out in the Tunak region and thus more efforts should be made to help the local residents understand the positive outcome of the project and to promote the ongoing cooperation between Korea and Indonesia in the forestry sector. Results of this study showed that the projects have been effectively carried out and the impact of the project was well perceived by the recipient country. In addition, this positive perception of Korea is expected to help recreation and ecotourism business progress in the region. Therefore, we believe that the project should continue to be carried-out in the future and we expect that related companies will be able to operate on its own eventually. As it is difficult to evaluate the outcome of an ongoing project precisely, this study should be conducted again after the project completion and the results can be compared to the present results so that the effectiveness of ODA project can be more accurately determined.

Keywords

References

  1. Babbie ER. 2015. The practice of social research. pp. 5-29. Wadsworth publishing, Belmont, CA.
  2. Boone NH, Boone DA. 2012. Analyzing likert data. Journal of extension 50:1-5.
  3. Chang JH, Jeong BC. 2005. A comparative study on two models of international development cooperation: Based on the ODA of Germany and Japan. The Korean Journal of Area Studies 26:311-339. [in Korean]
  4. EIBK (The Export-Import Bank of Korea). 2011. EDCF evaluation manual. [in Korean]
  5. EIBK (The Export-Import Bank of Korea). 2012. Guidebook for joint evaluation. [in Korean]
  6. Ji SY, Lee SH, Lee OK, Choi JY. 2016. A survey on the perception of China private antidesertification afforestation support project and evaluation. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:288-297. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160031
  7. World Bank, 2015. GDP per capita. Accessed in http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD.
  8. Yoo BI, Yoon BE. 2014. A study on the evaluations on Korea's official development assistance in the forest sector and the way to improve its development effectiveness. Journal of Rural Development 37:145-164. [in Korean]