농업과학연구 (Korean Journal of Agricultural Science)

  • 제44권2호
  • /
  • Pages.244-253
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2466-2402(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-2410(eISSN)
충남대학교 농업과학연구소 (Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative study of growth performances of six different Korean native chicken crossbreeds from hatch to twelve weeks of age

  • Shin, Taeg Kyun (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Wickramasuriya, Samiru Sudharaka (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Eunjoo (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun Min (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Heo, Jung Min (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yi, Young-Joo (Division of Biotechnology, Safety, Environment and Life Science Institute, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.04
  • 심사 : 2017.05.23
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was conducted to investigate the growth performance indices among male commercial crossbred Korean native chickens from hatch to twelve weeks of age. A total of 312 one-day-old male birds were used for 6 groups of the commercial crossbred Korean native chicken within 1 paternal line and 6 maternal lines (1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A, and 6A). The chickens were allocated to 24 battery cages to give 4 replicates per each crossbreed with 13 chickens per cage. Ad-libitum feeding was practiced throughout the experimental period and fresh water was available via nipple drinkers at all times. Body weight and feed intake were measured at two-week interval. Among six crossbreeds, the 2A group had the greatest (p < 0.05) body weight at week 8 and the greatest average daily weight gain in week 6 - 8. However, crossbreed 2A had the lowest viability (p < 0.05) at week 8 of all crossbreed groups as well as higher uniformity (p > 0.05) at week 2 than the others. No difference (p < 0.05) was found in any crossbreed Korean native chicken's growth performance indices including body weight, average daily gain, average daily feed intake, feed efficiency, uniformity, and viability after week 8. With this in mind, crossbreed 2A had greater bodyweight, average daily gain, average feed intake, and feed efficiency than the other Korean native chickens 84 days after hatch, although they had lower uniformity and viability than the others.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn DH, Park SY. 2002. Studies on components related to taste such as free amino acids and nucleotides in Korean native chicken meat. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 31:547-552. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2002.31.4.547
  2. Behre ET, Gous RM. 2008. Effect of dietary protein content on growth, uniformity and mortality of two commercial broiler strains. South African Journal of Animal Science 38:293-302.
  3. Blanchard SM, Degernes LA, DeWolf DK, Garlich JD. 2002. Intermittent biotelemetric monitoring of electrocardiograms and temperature in male broilers at risk for sudden death syndrome. Poultry science 81:887-891. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.6.887
  4. Cha JB, Hong EC, Kim SH, Kim CD, Heo KN, Choo HJ, Oh KS, Kang BS. 2016. Economic performance test of commercial chickens (CC) crossbred with parent stock (PS) of Korean native chicken (KNC). Korean Journal of Poultry Science 43:207-212. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.4.207
  5. Choe JH, Nam KC, Jung S, Kim BN, Yun HJ, Jo CR. 2010. Differences in the quality characteristics between commercial Korean native chickens and broilers. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources 30:13-19. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.1.13
  6. Dozier WA, Thaxton JP, Branton SL, Morgan GW, Miles DM, Roush WB, Vizzier-Thaxton Y. 2005. Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Science 84:1332-1338. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1332
  7. Imeada N. 2000. Influence of the stocking density and rearing season on incidence of sudden death syndrome in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 79:201-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.2.201
  8. Kang BS, Cheong IC, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Ohh BK, Choi KS. 1997a. Estimation of heterosis for some economic traits in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and rhode island red-I. Hatching and growing performance in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and rhode island red. Korean Journal of Poultry Science24:117-126. [in Korean]
  9. Kang BS, Cheong IC, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Ohh BK, Choi KS. 1997b. Estimation of heterosis for some economic traits in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and rhode island red-II. Laying performance of Korean native chicken and rhode island red crossbreds. Korean Journal of Poultry Science24:127-137. [in Korean]
  10. Kang BS, Hong EC, Kim HK, Yu DJ, Park MN, Seo BY, Choo HJ, Na SH, Seo OS, Hwangbo J. 2010. Hatching and growing performance of three-way crossbreds of Korean native chickens. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 37:399-404. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2010.37.4.399
  11. Kang BS, Kim JD, Jung IJ, Jung SB, Yang CB. 1992. Studies on the production of high quality meat with traditional chicken hybrids. Livestock Experiment Station Test Report 376-383. [in Korean]
  12. Kim HK, Hong EC, Kang BS, Kim CD, Heo KN, Choo HJ, HwangBo, J. 2012. Laying performance of two pure-line Korean native ducks at different house types. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 39:53-60. [in Korean]
  13. Kim SH, Lee SJ, Kang BS, Choi CS, Jang BG, Ohh BK. 1998. Studies on the performance of Korean native chickens-II. A comparison of performance of various Korean native chickens. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 25:177-183. [in Korean]
  14. Kim YS, Byun MJ, Suh SW, Kim JH, Cho CY, Park SB, Choi SB. 2014. Comparison of growth performance at rearing stage between Korean native chicken and imported chickens. Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture 26:568-573. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2014.26.4.568
  15. Kim YS, Kim JH, Suh SW, Kim H, Byun MJ, Kim MJ, Choi SB. 2012. Comparison of growth performance between Korean native layer chickens and imported layer chickens at early rearing stage. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 39:283-290. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.4.283
  16. Lee HS, Kang BS, Na JC, Ryu, KS. 2008. Effects of dietary energy, protein on growth and blood composition in cross-bred with Korean native chicks. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 35:399-405. [in Korean]
  17. Lee MJ, Heo KN, Choi HC, Hong EC, Kim CD. 2014. The performance test in crossbreds of Korean native chickens for the establishment of new lines. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 41:39-44. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.41.1.39
  18. MAFRA. 2014. Ministry of agriculture food and rural affairs, Korea. Production and consumption trend of agricultural and livestock production. [in Korean]
  19. MAFRA. 2015. Ministry of agriculture food and rural affairs, Korea. Livestock production cost survey. [in Korean]
  20. MAFRA. 2016. Ministry of agriculture food and rural affairs, Korea. Inspection of livestock slaughter. [in Korean]
  21. National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS). 2008. Korean native chicken certification standard institution research. [in Korean]
  22. National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS). 2012. Korean feeding standard for poultry. [in Korean]
  23. Neto RM, Surek D, da Rocha C, Dahlke F, Maiorka A. 2013. The effect of grouping one-day-old chicks by body weight on the uniformity of broilers. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22:245-250. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00636
  24. Ohh BK. 1994. A study on the high quality meat making of Korean traditional chicken. Korean Poultry Science Symposium. [in Korean]
  25. Park MN, Hong EC, Kang BS, HwangBo J, Kim HK. 2011. Performance and meat quality of three-crossbreed Korean native chickens (KNC). Korean Journal of Poultry Science 38:293-304. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2011.38.4.293
  26. Park MN, Hong EC, Kang BS, Kim HK, Seo BY, Choo HJ, HwangBo J. 2010. The study on production and performance of crossbred Korean native chickens (KNC). Korean Journal of Poultry Science 37:347-354. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2010.37.4.347
  27. Seol KH, Kim KH, Jo SM, Kim YH, Kim HW, Ham JS. 2015. The distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogenic microorganisms isolated from chicken slaughtering and processing procedure. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 42:29-35. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2015.42.1.029
  28. Yoo J, Koo B, Kim E, Heo JM. 2015. Comparison of growth performance between crossbred Korean native chickens for hatch to 28 days. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 42:23-27. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2015.42.1.023
  29. Yunis R Ben-David A Heller ED Cahaner A. 2000. Immunocompetence and viability under commercial conditions of broiler groups differing in growth rate and in antibody response to Escherichia coli vaccine. Poultry Science 79:810-816. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.6.810

피인용 문헌

  1. Determination of growth performance of crossbred Korean native chickens for twelve weeks after hatching vol.44, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170053
  2. Study of six different commercial Koran-native chicken crossbreeds from hatch to twelve weeks of age vol.44, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170062
  3. Comparison of the performance of the laying period of crossbred Korean native chickens from 20 to 40 weeks of age vol.45, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20180063
  4. Determination and comparison of growth performance parameters between two crossbred strains of Korean native chickens with a white semi broiler chicken for 84 days post-hatch vol.47, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200016
  5. Comparison of growth performances with three different Korean native chickens for a twelve-week post hatch period vol.47, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200048
  6. Comparison of Selection Signatures between Korean Native and Commercial Chickens Using 600K SNP Array Data vol.12, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12060824
  7. 신품종 토종닭 생산을 위한 교배조합 검정시험 vol.48, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2021.48.3.101