DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Longitudinal Study on the Changes to Copyright Policies for Korean KCI Journals

국내 학술지 저작권 정책 변화 의미 분석

  • Received : 2017.06.08
  • Accepted : 2017.06.20
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

This study analyzed changes to copyright policies in KCI journals comparatively using the previous 2 research results published in 2008 and 2016 and then gave insight into the meaning of the changes. The results of the study are as follows: Journals making the subject of copyright public had increased from 34% in 2008 to 67% in 2016. Journals transferring copyright from authors remained almost the same, with only a slight increase from 90% to 91% in the same period. Journals using the term 'publication rights' instead of 'copyright' had decreased; on the other hand, journals using the term 'reproduction right' and 'right of transmission' had increased. Use of copyright transfer agreement had increased from 25% to 50%; on the other hand, self archiving policy remained almost the same, decreasing slightly from 13% to 12%. This study argues that these changes mean the establishment of copyright industrialization for Korean journals and that the publishing bodies appear to be the most powerful main agent among stakeholders participating in scholarly publishing in this process.

본 연구는 2008년과 2016년에 각각 수행된 한국연구재단등재지의 저작권 관리 현황 연구결과를 비교하고 그 변화의 의미를 파악하고자 하였다. 그 결과 저작권 소유 주체를 밝힌 등재지는 34%에서 67%로 증가하였고, 저작권은 출판기관에 양도하고 있는 경우가 90%에서 91%로 큰 변화가 없었다. 판권이라는 용어의 사용은 감소한 반면 복제권, 전송권이라는 용어사용은 증가하였다. 저작권양도동의서를 사용하는 등재지는 25%에서 50%로 증가한 반면, 저자에게 셀프아카이빙을 허용하는 경우는 13%에서 12%로 거의 변화가 없었다. 본 연구는 이러한 변화가 국내 학술지의 저작권산업화 기반구축을 의미하는 것으로 보았고, 이 과정에서 학술지 출판기관이 매우 강력한 이해당사자로 자리매김하고 있음을 발견하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한성대학교, 전주대학교

References

  1. 김규환, 정경희 (2017). 국내 학술지 오픈액세스 정책 현황 분석: 이용자 접근과 재사용 권리를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지. 투고 준비 중 논문.
  2. 이재민 (2005). 오픈액세스를 위한 학술논문의 저작권 귀속현황과 개선방안. 석사학위논문, 대구대학교대학원, 문헌정보학과. Lee, Jae-Min (2005). Copyright possession and improving plan of scholarly journal paper in Korea: For the open access strategies. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Daegu University, Department of Library and Information Science.
  3. 정경희. (2011). 국내 오픈액세스 학술지 특성에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 22(3), 373-391. Joung, Kyoung Hee (2011). Characteristics of open access journals in Korea: Focused on KCI journals. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 22(3), 373-391. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2011.22.3.373
  4. 정경희, 김규환 (2016). 국내 학술지의 저작권 관리 특성 분석. 정보관리학회지, 33(4), 269-291. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2016.33.4.269 Joung, Kyoung Hee & Kim, Gyuhwan (2016). The characteristics of the copyright management for Korean journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(4), 269-291. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2016.33.4.269
  5. 조경식 (2014). 새로운 매체 환경에서 저자와 저작권의 논쟁. 유럽사회문화, 13, 107-133. Cho, Kyoung Sik (2014). Debatte um autor und urheberrecht in der neuen medienumwelt. European Society and Culture, 13, 107-133.
  6. 최윤형 (2013). 국내 학술지 논문의 저작권 귀속 방안에 대한 연구. 석사학위논문, 충남대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과. Choi, Yoonhyung (2013). A study on copyright possession plan of journal articles in Korea. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Chungnam National University, Department of Library and Information Science.
  7. 홍재현 (2008). 국내 학술지 논문의 오픈 액세스와 아카이빙을 위한 저작권 귀속 연구: 한국학술진흥재단 등재 학술지를 중심으로. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 39(1), 431-463. Hong, Jae-Hyun (2008). A study on copyright possession for open access and archiving of scholarly journal paper registered in Korean Research Foundation. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(1), 431-463. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.1.200803.431
  8. Coleman, A. (2007). Self-archiving and the copyright transfer agreements of ISI-Ranked library and information science journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20494
  9. Dawson, P. H., & Yang, S. Q. (2016). Institutional repositories, open access and copyright: What are the practices and implications? Science & Technology Libraries, 35(4), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262x.2016.1224994
  10. Gadd, E. A., & Troll Covey, D. (2017). What does green open access mean? Tracking twelve years of changes to journal publisher self archiving policies. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616657406
  11. Harper, G. (2009). OA and IP: Open access, digital copyright and marketplace competition. Learned Publishing, 22, 283-288. https://doi.org/10.1087/20090404
  12. Laakso, M. (2014). Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: A study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics, 99(2), 475-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3
  13. Melero, R., Laakso, M., & Navas-Fernandez, M. (2017). Openness of Spanish scholarly journals as measured by access and rights. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1095
  14. Melero, R., Rodriguez-Gairin, J. M., Abad-Garcia, F., & Abadal, E. (2014). Journal author rights and self-archiving: The case of Spanish journals. Learned Publishing, 27(2), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1087/20140205
  15. Page, G., Campbell, R., & Meadows, J. (1996). Journal publishing: Principles and practice. London: Butterworths (Ramello, G. 2010. Copyright & endogenous market structure: A glimpse from the journal-publishing market. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7(1), 7-29. 에서 재인용).
  16. Ramello, G. (2010). Copyright & endogenous market structure: A glimpse from the journalpublishing market. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7(1), 7-29.
  17. Visser, D. (2015). The open access provision in Dutch copyright contract law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10(11), 872-878. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpv161