Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of contact and distance osteogenesis around modified implant surfaces in rabbit tibiae

  • Choi, Jung-Yoo (Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Sim, Jae-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Yeo, In-Sung Luke (Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2017.05.10
  • Accepted : 2017.06.07
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Contact and distance osteogenesis occur around all endosseous dental implants. However, the mechanisms underlying these processes have not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that these processes occur independently of each other. To test this, we used titanium (Ti) tubes to physically separate contact and distance osteogenesis, thus allowing contact osteogenesis to be measured in the absence of possible triggers from distance osteogenesis. Methods: Sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) and modified SLA (modSLA) implants were used. Both types had been sandblasted with large grit and then etched with acid. The modSLA implants then underwent additional treatment to increase hydrophilicity. The implants were implanted into rabbit tibiae, and half were implanted within Ti tubes. The bone-to-implant contact (BIC) ratio was calculated for each implant. Immunohistochemical analyses of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 expression and new bone formation (Masson trichrome stain) were performed. Results: The implants outside of Ti tubes were associated with good bone formation along the implant surface. Implantation within a Ti tube significantly reduced the BIC ratio (P<0.001). Compared with the modSLA implants, the SLA implants were associated with significantly higher BIC ratios, regardless of the presence or absence of Ti tubes (P=0.043). In the absence of Ti tubes, the bone adjacent to the implant had areas of new bone formation that expressed BMP-2 at high levels. Conclusions: This study disproved the null hypothesis and suggested that contact osteogenesis is initiated by signals from the old bone that undergoes distance osteogenesis after drilling. This signal may be BMP-2.

Keywords

References

  1. Osborn J, Newesely H. Dynamic aspects of the implant-bone interface. In: Heimke G, editor. Dental implants. Munche: Verlag; 1980. p. 111-23.
  2. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:251-62. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x
  3. Davies JE. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface. Anat Rec 1996;245:426-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199606)245:2<426::AID-AR21>3.0.CO;2-Q
  4. Moreo P, Garcia-Aznar JM, Doblare M. Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: mathematical model. J Theor Biol 2009;260:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.07.040
  5. Sela MN, Badihi L, Rosen G, Steinberg D, Kohavi D. Adsorption of human plasma proteins to modified titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:630-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01373.x
  6. Terheyden H, Lang NP, Bierbaum S, Stadlinger B. Osseointegration--communication of cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1127-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02327.x
  7. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012;20:256-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.010
  8. Yeo IS, Han JS, Yang JH. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;87:303-11.
  9. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:318-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00172.x
  10. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:189-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00302.x
  11. Nygren H, Tengvall P, Lundstrom I. The initial reactions of TiO2 with blood. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34:487-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19970315)34:4<487::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-G
  12. Park JY, Davies JE. Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:530-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006530.x
  13. Ammann AJ, Beck LS, DeGuzman L, Hirabayashi SE, Lee WP, McFatridge L, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta. Effect on soft tissue repair. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1990;593:124-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb16105.x
  14. Brighton CT. The biology of fracture repair. Instr Course Lect 1984;33:60-82.
  15. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:99-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374990130012301
  16. Cromack DT, Pierce GF, Mustoe TA. TGF-beta and PDGF mediated tissue repair: identifying mechanisms of action using impaired and normal models of wound healing. Prog Clin Biol Res 1991;365:359-73.
  17. Ikeda K, Takeshita S. Factors and mechanisms involved in the coupling from bone resorption to formation: how osteoclasts talk to osteoblasts. J Bone Metab 2014;21:163-7. https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2014.21.3.163
  18. Mustoe TA, Pierce GF, Morishima C, Deuel TF. Growth factor-induced acceleration of tissue repair through direct and inductive activities in a rabbit dermal ulcer model. J Clin Invest 1991;87:694-703. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115048
  19. Pfeilschifter J, Wolf O, Naumann A, Minne HW, Mundy GR, Ziegler R. Chemotactic response of osteoblastlike cells to transforming growth factor beta. J Bone Miner Res 1990;5:825-30.
  20. Postlethwaite AE, Keski-Oja J, Moses HL, Kang AH. Stimulation of the chemotactic migration of human fibroblasts by transforming growth factor beta. J Exp Med 1987;165:251-6. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.165.1.251
  21. Deuel TF, Senior RM, Huang JS, Griffin GL. Chemotaxis of monocytes and neutrophils to platelet-derived growth factor. J Clin Invest 1982;69:1046-9. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110509
  22. Huang JS, Huang SS, Kennedy B, Deuel TF. Platelet-derived growth factor. Specific binding to target cells. J Biol Chem 1982;257:8130-6.
  23. Park JY, Gemmell CH, Davies JE. Platelet interactions with titanium: modulation of platelet activity by surface topography. Biomaterials 2001;22:2671-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00009-6
  24. Pierce GF, Mustoe TA, Lingelbach J, Masakowski VR, Griffin GL, Senior RM, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta enhance tissue repair activities by unique mechanisms. J Cell Biol 1989;109:429-40. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.109.1.429
  25. Seppa H, Grotendorst G, Seppa S, Schiffmann E, Martin GR. Platelet-derived growth factor in chemotactic for fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1982;92:584-8. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.92.2.584
  26. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;150:893-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3698.893
  27. El Bialy I, Jiskoot W, Reza Nejadnik M. Formulation, delivery and stability of bone morphogenetic proteins for effective bone regeneration. Pharm Res 2017;34:1152-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-017-2147-x

Cited by

  1. Osteogenic Cell Behavior on Titanium Surfaces in Hard Tissue vol.8, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050604
  2. Time course analyses of structural changes in the infrapatellar fat pad and synovial membrane during inflammation-induced persistent pain development in rat knee joint vol.20, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2391-1
  3. Modifications of Dental Implant Surfaces at the Micro- and Nano-Level for Enhanced Osseointegration vol.13, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010089
  4. Role of implants surface modification in osseointegration: A systematic review vol.108, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36829
  5. Bone formation around two titanium implant surfaces placed in bone defects with and without a bone substitute material: A histological, histomorphometric, and micro‐computed tomography evaluati vol.22, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12880
  6. The status and issues of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University: from its establishment to the present day vol.70, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.21-0066
  7. The impact of surface treatment in 3-dimensional printed implants for early osseointegration: a comparison study of three different surfaces vol.11, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89961-3