DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sinus augmentation using rhBMP-2-loaded synthetic bone substitute with simultaneous implant placement in rabbits

  • Joo, Myung-Jae (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cha, Jae-Kook (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Chang (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2016.12.06
  • Accepted : 2017.02.15
  • Published : 2017.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2)-loaded synthetic bone substitute on implants that were simultaneously placed with sinus augmentation in rabbits. Methods: In this study, a circular access window was prepared in the maxillary sinus of rabbits (n=5) for a bone graft around an implant (${\varnothing}3{\times}6mm$) that was simultaneously placed anterior to the window. Synthetic bone substitute loaded with rhBMP-2 was placed on one side of the sinus to form the experimental group, and saline-soaked synthetic bone substitute was placed on the other side of the sinus to form the control group. After 4 weeks, sections were obtained for analysis by micro-computed tomography and histology. Results: Volumetric analysis showed that the median amount of newly formed bone was significantly greater in the BMP group than in the control group ($51.6mm^3$ and $46.6mm^3$, respectively; P=0.019). In the histometric analysis, the osseointegration height was also significantly greater in the BMP group at the medial surface of the implant (5.2 mm and 4.3 mm, respectively; P=0.037). Conclusions: In conclusion, an implant simultaneously placed with sinus augmentation using rhBMP-2-loaded synthetic bone substitute can be successfully osseointegrated, even when only a limited bone height is available during the early stage of healing.

Keywords

References

  1. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13 Suppl:11-45.
  2. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-43. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328
  3. Peleg M, Mazor Z, Garg AK. Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus and simultaneous implant placement in patients with 3 to 5 mm of residual alveolar bone height. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:549-56.
  4. Peleg M, Mazor Z, Chaushu G, Garg AK. Sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic maxilla. J Periodontol 1998;69:1397-403. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.12.1397
  5. Felice P, Pistilli R, Piattelli M, Soardi E, Barausse C, Esposito M. 1-stage versus 2-stage lateral sinus lift procedures: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7:65-75.
  6. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2
  7. Jung UW, Hong JY, Lee JS, Kim CS, Cho KS, Choi SH. A hybrid technique for sinus floor elevation in the severely resorbed posterior maxilla. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:76-85. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.2.76
  8. Felice P, Scarano A, Pistilli R, Checchi L, Piattelli M, Pellegrino G, et al. A comparison of two techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using the lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers versus anorganic bovine bone. Five-month post-loading clinical and histological results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2:293-306.
  9. Choi Y, Lee JS, Kim YJ, Kim MS, Choi SH, Cho KS, et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 stimulates the osteogenic potential of the Schneiderian membrane: a histometric analysis in rabbits. Tissue Eng Part A 2013;19:1994-2004. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0724
  10. Seeherman H, Wozney J, Li R. Bone morphogenetic protein delivery systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:S16-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200208151-00005
  11. Jung IH, Lim HC, Lee EU, Lee JS, Jung UW, Choi SH. Comparative analysis of carrier systems for delivering bone morphogenetic proteins. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2015;45:136-44. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.4.136
  12. Alam I, Asahina I, Ohmamiuda K, Enomoto S. Comparative study of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics impregnated with rhBMP-2 as bone substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:129-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(200101)54:1<129::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-D
  13. Brodie JC, Goldie E, Connel G, Merry J, Grant MH. Osteoblast interactions with calcium phosphate ceramics modified by coating with type I collagen. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;73:409-21.
  14. Kim JS, Cha JK, Cho AR, Kim MS, Lee JS, Hong JY, et al. Acceleration of bone regeneration by BMP-2-loaded collagenated biphasic calcium phosphate in rabbit sinus. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1103-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12223
  15. Watanabe K, Niimi A, Ueda M. Autogenous bone grafts in the rabbit maxillary sinus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70189-7
  16. Wada K, Niimi A, Watanabe K, Sawai T, Ueda M. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation in rabbits: a comparative histologic-histomorphometric study between rhBMP-2 and autogenous bone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:252-63.
  17. Sun XJ, Zhang ZY, Wang SY, Gittens SA, Jiang XQ, Chou LL. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a tissue-engineered bone complex with OsteoBone and bMSCs in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:804-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01577.x
  18. Kim YS, Kim SH, Kim KH, Jhin MJ, Kim WK, Lee YK, et al. Rabbit maxillary sinus augmentation model with simultaneous implant placement: differential responses to the graft materials. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2012;42:204-11. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2012.42.6.204
  19. Brunner E, Langer F. Nonparametric analysis of ordered categorical data in designs with longitudinal observations and small sample sizes. Biom J 2000;42:663-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4036(200010)42:6<663::AID-BIMJ663>3.0.CO;2-7
  20. Wikesjo UM, Qahash M, Thomson RC, Cook AD, Rohrer MD, Wozney JM, et al. rhBMP-2 significantly enhances guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:194-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00971.x
  21. Yasko AW, Lane JM, Fellinger EJ, Rosen V, Wozney JM, Wang EA. The healing of segmental bone defects, induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). A radiographic, histological, and biomechanical study in rats. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:659-70. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274050-00005
  22. Sigurdsson TJ, Fu E, Tatakis DN, Rohrer MD, Wikesjo UM. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 for peri-implant bone regeneration and osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:367-74. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080503.x
  23. Guillot R, Gilde F, Becquart P, Sailhan F, Lapeyrere A, Logeart-Avramoglou D, et al. The stability of BMP loaded polyelectrolyte multilayer coatings on titanium. Biomaterials 2013;34:5737-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.067
  24. Jung UW, Unursaikhan O, Park JY, Lee JS, Otgonbold J, Choi SH. Tenting effect of the elevated sinus membrane over an implant with adjunctive use of a hydroxyapatite-powdered collagen membrane in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:663-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12362
  25. Chen D, Zhao M, Harris SE, Mi Z. Signal transduction and biological functions of bone morphogenetic proteins. Front Biosci 2004;9:349-58. https://doi.org/10.2741/1090
  26. Khoury F. Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:557-64.

Cited by

  1. Prognosis of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Dental Implant Installation on Severely Resorbed Posterior Maxilla: Report of Cases vol.21, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12972/implantology.20170007
  2. Bio-Oss와 β-TCP를 이용한 토끼 상악동 거상술 후의 조직학적 비교 연구 vol.28, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2018.28.10.1220
  3. Immediate nonfunctional loading of implants placed simultaneously using computer‐guided flapless maxillary crestal sinus augmentation with bone morphogenetic protein‐2/collagen matrix vol.21, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12831
  4. Clinical Application of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells to Repair Skeletal Tissue vol.21, pp.24, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249759
  5. Combination of bone substitutes and vectors in periodontology and implantology: A systematic review vol.40, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-361