DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Students Use of Multimodal Representations in a Science Formative Assessment (Assessing Pupils' Progress, APP) Task in the UK

  • Cho, Hye Sook (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University) ;
  • Nam, Jeonghee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2017.04.12
  • Accepted : 2017.06.14
  • Published : 2017.08.20

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine UK students' use of multimodal representations in science. Students were asked to explain their understandings of the scientific concept and presentation of the multimodal representations in a science Assessing Pupils' Progress (APP) task. Participants of this study were fifty-four Year 7 students taught by the same teacher. Students from one class (27 students) were assigned to the experimental group, and then they received instruction encouraging the using of multimodal representations as evidences to support students' claims. One class (27 students) was assigned to the control group and they received instruction with traditional teaching methods. Both groups performed an APP task for assessment. The samples of APP assessments produced by students both from the experimental and control groups were analyzed using an analysis framework of multimodal representations, embeddedness in evidence and understanding of scientific concepts. Data analysis indicated that the students in the experimental group performed better than that of the control group on embeddedness of multimodal representations in the APP task. In addition, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the evaluation of understand of the scientific concepts.

Keywords

References

  1. Barr, R. B.; Tagg, J. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 1995, 27, 12.
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1993.
  3. Huba, M. E.; Freed, J. E. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.
  4. Collins, J. W.; O'Brien, N. P. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2003.
  5. Kwon, Y. J.; Jeong, J. S.; Park, Y. B.; Kang, M. J. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2003, 23, 215.
  6. National Research Council. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2000.
  7. Vygotsky, L. S. Cambridge Mass; Harvard University Press: 1978.
  8. Ash, D. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2008, 45, 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20199
  9. Yore, L. D.; Florence, M. K.; Pearson, T. W.; Weaver, A. J. International Journal of Science Education 2006, 28, 109. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336601
  10. Dillon, J. T. Open University Press: Buckingham, 1994.
  11. Duschl, R. A. Ellenborgen, K. Paper presented at the International Conference on Literacy; Empowering and Informing Instruction: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2002.
  12. Kelly, G. J.; Bazerman, C.; Skukauakaite, A.; Prothero, W. Paper presented at the International Conference on Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistic and Pedagogical Considerations of Language and Science literacy; Empowering Research and Informing Instruction: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2002.
  13. Duschl, R.; Ellenbogan, K.; Erduran, S. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, 1999.
  14. De Vries, E.; Lund, K.; Baker, M. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2002, 11, 63. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_3
  15. Emig, J. College Composition and Communication 1977, 28, 122. https://doi.org/10.2307/356095
  16. Erduran, S.; Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2008.
  17. Hand, B.; Wallace, C.; Yang, E. International Journal of Science Education 2004, 26, 131. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070252
  18. Schnotz, W.; Lowe, R. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00015-4
  19. Bennett, W. D. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa, 2011.
  20. Kelly, G. J.; Takao, A. Science Education 2002, 86, 314. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10024
  21. Ainsworth, S. E. Computers & Education 1999, 33, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9
  22. Nakhleh, M. B.; Posteck, B. Netherlands: Springer, 2008.
  23. Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) London: DCSF, 2008.
  24. Rowe N. National Foundation for Educational Research, 2010.
  25. Gillbert, J. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2004, 2, 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4
  26. Cho, H. S. Master dissertation, Pusan National University, 2009.
  27. McClure, L.; Piggott, J. Routledge, 2007
  28. Dori, Y. J.; Sasson, I. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2008, 45, 219. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20197
  29. Glynn, S. The Science Teacher 1997, 64, 30.
  30. Stein, M.; McNair, S.; Butcher, J. Science and Children, 2001, 38, 18.
  31. Bonder, G. M.; McMillen, T. L. B. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1986, 23, 727. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230807
  32. Carter, C. S.; LaRussa, M. A.; Bo Bonder, G. M.; McMillen, T. L. B. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1986, 23, 727. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230807
  33. Staver, J. R.; Jacks. T. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1988, 25, 763. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250906
  34. McKenzie, D.; Padilla, M. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, 1984.
  35. Bogiages, C. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina-Columbia, 2014.
  36. Nam J. H.; Kwak K. H.; Jang, K. H.; Hand, B. Journal of the Korean Association of Science Education 2008, 28, 922.