The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Eight-year follow-up of two different removable prostheses using six implants in maxillary edentulous patients

상악 완전 무치악 환자에서 6개의 임플란트를 동반한 두가지 가철성 의치 치료의 8년 경과 관찰 증례

  • Yang, Seung-Won (Department of Prosthodonitcs, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Eun (Department of Prosthodonitcs, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Jee-Hwan (Department of Prosthodonitcs, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 양승원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김종은 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김지환 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2017.02.02
  • Accepted : 2017.05.26
  • Published : 2017.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (ISFDP) or an implant-supported overdenture (IOD) are good options when treating a completely edentulous jaw opposing natural teeth. However, an ISFDP for a full arch requires sufficient bone quality and quantity, which limits its application. Meanwhile, using an ISFDP as an abutment of a removable partial denture has been considered recently. This clinical report discusses the treatments applied to two patients with edentulous maxillas and opposing natural teeth: one was treated with an IOD and the other was treated with an ISFDP and removable partial denture. Follow-up and management were performed for 8 years.

자연치열에 대합하는 완전 무치악 환자의 수복에서 임플란트를 이용한 고정성 보철물 또는 임플란트 피개의치는 좋은 치료법이다. 그러나, 완전 고정성 보철을 통한 치료는 충분한 골질, 골량이 뒷받침되어야 하기에 그 한계가 있다. 한편, 최근에는 임플란트 고정성 보철물과 함께 그것을 가철성 국소의치의 지대치로 사용하는 치료가 행해지고 있다. 본 증례보고는 자연치열에 대합되는 두 상악 완전 무치악 환자에 있어 임플란트 피개의치와 임플란트 고정성 보철물 및 가철성 국소의치를 이용한 치료 및 8년 경과관찰, 유지보수를 비교 고찰해 보고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jivraj S, Chee W, Corrado P. Treatment planning of the edentulous maxilla. Br Dent J 2006;201:261-79. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813952
  2. DeBoer J. Edentulous implants: overdenture versus fixed. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:386-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90186-R
  3. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  4. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Problems with prostheses on implants: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:283-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90468-5
  5. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:197-212. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.12.x
  6. Osman RB, Payne AG, Ma S. Prosthodontic maintenance of maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:381-91.
  7. Kiener P, Oetterli M, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Effectiveness of maxillary overdentures supported by implants: maintenance and prosthetic complications. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:133-40.
  8. Chronopoulos V, Sarafianou A, Kourtis S. The use of dental implants in combination with removable partial dentures: a case report. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20:355-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00209.x
  9. Pellecchia M, Pellecchia R, Emtiaz S. Distal extension mandibular removable partial denture connected to an anterior fixed implant-supported prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:607-12. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.107114
  10. Starr NL. The distal extension case: an alternative restorative design for implant prosthetics. Int J Periodontic Restor Dent 2001; 21:61-7.