DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

보상비율을 고려한 건설사업 분쟁사례 분석 - 대한상사중재원 중재판정사례를 중심으로 -

Analysis of Construction Dispute Cases Considering Reward Ratio Focused on Arbitration Cases of Korean Commercial Arbitration Board

  • Ahn, SangHyun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Choi, Heeju (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Yu, Jungho (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University)
  • 투고 : 2017.05.03
  • 심사 : 2017.07.17
  • 발행 : 2017.07.31

초록

건설사업은 목적물의 특성, 사업규모, 계약방식 등에 따라 다양한 사업주체가 참여하고 그로인해 복잡한 의사소통 구조를 가지고 있기 때문에 이해관계의 대립으로 인한 클레임 및 분쟁이 지속적으로 발생하고 있다. 그런데 분쟁의 사례를 살펴보면 상당수가 시공사와 발주자 사이에서 발생하고, 발주자의 우월적 지위에 따른 불공정 관행이 원인이 되어 분쟁이 제기되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 상대적으로 계약적 약자인 시공사를 정보 활용 주체로 설정하고 대한상사중재원의 중재판정 사례를 바탕으로 분쟁 발생 유형 및 원인별 분석뿐만 아니라 보상비용 등에 관한 분석을 수행하여 시공사의 분쟁에 따른 시간적, 경제적 손실을 최소화하고자 하였다. 이를 통해 공사 수행 중 발생 가능한 분쟁 대응전략을 수립하는데 도움을 줌으로 써 원활한 합의 유도 및 공사의 완성도를 높이는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

Construction Projects have many participants by characteristic, scale and contract. Those also have complicated communication structure. So, claim and dispute occur continuously for conflicting communication. In many claim and dispute cases, it usually occurs between builder and owner. Unfair practices by owners position cause main claim and dispute. This study analyses judgment type, cause and compensation ratio in korean commercial arbitration case and provides the dispute information for builder that has weak position by contract. It draws analysis information for managing and controlling dispute that order type, judgement type, cause and failure case. Using these analysis information, it hopes to help inducement of dispute agreement and save time and economic damage for builder during construction. It also hopes to rise construction completeness by providing dispute management information.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, Y. J., and Lee, S. B. (2005). "A study on mitigation of construction dispute in public projects" Architectural Institute of Korea, 21(8), pp. 129-136.
  2. Doo, S. H. (2003). "Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management" Construction Economy Reserch Institute of Korea.
  3. Fair Trade Commission, Statistical Yearbook.
  4. Kim, D. S., Cho, Y. J., Hyun, C. T., and Hong, T. H. (2008). "A study on the structure of indirect field negotiation system for effective dispute resolution at contract administration stage" Architectural Institute of Korea, 24(9), pp. 131-138.
  5. Kim, I. H., Hong, Y. T., Ryu, H. G., and Lee, H. S. (2004). "A study on identification of the reasons od construction claim failure and proposal of improved methods of claims in the construction company's perspective" Architectural Institute of Korea Academic Conferences, 24(2), pp. 623-626.
  6. Kim, J. H., Im, H. K., and Choi, J. H. (2016). "Forecasting the effects of the claims in the korean construction industry" Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 17(5), pp. 35-44. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2016.17.5.035
  7. Korean Commercial Arbitration Board, Claims Statistics. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Press Releases.
  8. Park, S. Y., Tang, J. K., Kim, B. O., and Lee, S. B. (2009). "Identifying and analyzing pre-dispute factors for construction projects" Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(6), pp. 48-57.
  9. Shin, C. J., Kim, Y. K., Cho, K. M., Hyun, C. T., and Hong, T. H. (2011). "Development of checklist to prevent claim through dispute case analysis of public construction projects" Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 12(1), pp. 13-22. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2011.12.1.13
  10. Yoon, S. M., Hyun, C. T., Han, S. W., and Cha, Y. W. (2015). "Identification of claim elenments for design build projects using FMEA method" Journal of KBIM, 5(2), pp. 26-33. https://doi.org/10.13161/kibim.2015.5.2.026