Seismic assessment of base-isolated nuclear power plants

  • Farmanbordar, Babak (Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research (e-SEER), Department of Structure and Materials, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)) ;
  • Adnan, Azlan Bin (Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research (e-SEER), Department of Structure and Materials, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)) ;
  • Tahir, Mahmood Md. (UTM Construction Research Centre (CRC), Institute for Smart Infrastructures and Innovative Construction, Universiti, Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)) ;
  • Faridmehr, Iman (UTM Construction Research Centre (CRC), Institute for Smart Infrastructures and Innovative Construction, Universiti, Teknologi Malaysia (UTM))
  • 투고 : 2017.06.27
  • 심사 : 2017.07.04
  • 발행 : 2017.07.25


This research presented a numerical and experimental study on the seismic performance of first-generation base-isolated and fixed-base nuclear power plants (NPP). Three types of the base isolation system were applied to rehabilitate the first-generation nuclear power plants: frictional pendulum (FP), high-damping rubber (HDR) and lead-rubber (LR) base isolation. Also, an Excel program was proposed for the design of the abovementioned base isolators in accordance with UBC 97 and the Japan Society of Base Isolation Regulation. The seismic assessment was performed using the pushover and nonlinear time history analysis methods in accordance with the FEMA 356 regulation. To validate the adequacy of the proposed design procedure, two small-scale NPPs were constructed at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia's structural laboratory and subjected to a pushover test for two different base conditions, fixed and HDR-isolated base. The results showed that base-isolated structures achieved adequate seismic performance compared with the fixed-base one, and all three isolators led to a significant reduction in the containment's tension, overturning moment and base shear.



  1. 349 A.C. (2001), Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety Related Concrete Structures (ACI 349-01), In A.C. Institute (Ed.).
  2. (ICC), I.C.C. (1997), Uniform Building Code (UBC), International Council of Building Officials, U.S.A.
  3. Buckle, I.G. and Mayes, R.L. (1990), "Seismic isolation: History, application, and performance-a world view", Earthq. Spectr., 6(2), 161-201.
  4. Cheraghi, R.E. and Izadifarda, R.A. (2013), "Demand response modification factor for the investigation of inelastic response of base isolated structures", Earthq. Struct., 5(1), 23-48.
  5. Cho, S.G., Yun, S.M., Kim, D. and Hoo, K.J. (2015), "Analyses of vertical seismic responses of seismically isolated nuclear power plant structures supported by lead rubber bearings", J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Kor., 19(3), 133-143.
  6. Dhawade, S. (2014). "Comparative study for seismic performance of base isolated & fixed base RC frame structure", J. Civil Eng. Res., 5, 183-190.
  7. FEMA 356-Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (2000), American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, U.S.A.
  8. Huang, Y.N. (2008), Performance Assessment of Conventional and Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plants for Earthquake and Blast Loadings, ProQuest.
  9. Huang, Y.N., Whittaker, A.S. and Constantinou, M.C. (2006), Seismic Demands on Secondary Systems in Conventional and Isolated Nuclear Power Plants.
  10. Huang, Y.N., Whittaker, A.S., Constantinou, M.C. and Malushte, S. (2007), "Seismic demands on secondary systems in base‐isolated nuclear power plants", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(12), 1741-1761.
  11. Huang, Y.N., Whittaker, A.S., Kennedy, R.P. and Mayes, R.L. (2013), "Response of base‐isolated nuclear structures for design and beyond‐design basis earthquake shaking", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(3), 339-356.
  12. Huang, Y.N., Whittaker, A.S. and Luco, N. (2010), "Seismic performance assessment of base‐isolated safety‐related nuclear structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(13), 1421-1442.
  13. Jeon, B.G., Choi, H.S., Hahm, D.G. and Kim, N.S. (2015), "Seismic fragility analysis of base isolated NPP piping systems", J. Earthq. Eng. Soc. Kor., 19(1), 29-36.
  14. Konstantinidis, D., Kelly, J.M. and Makris, N. (2008), Experimental Investigation on the Seismic Response of Bridge Bearings, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, U.S.A.
  15. Naeim, F. and Kelly, J.M. (1999), Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice, John Wiley & Sons.
  16. Pan, P., Zamfirescu, D., Nakashima, M., Nakayasu, N. and Kashiwa, H. (2005), "Base-isolation design practice in Japan: Introduction to the post-Kobe approach", J. Earthq. Eng., 9(1), 147-171.
  17. Releasable, P. (1978), "Development of criteria for seismic review of selected nuclear power plants", Urban., 51, 61801.
  18. Robinson, W.H. (1982), "Lead‐rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10(4), 593-604.
  19. Sayed, M.A., Go, S., Cho, S.G. and Kim, D. (2015), "Seismic responses of base-isolated nuclear power plant structures considering spatially varying ground motions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(1), 169-188.
  20. Skinner, R., Tyler, R. and Hodder, S. (1976)., "Isolation of nuclear power plants from earthquake attack", Bullet. New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 9(4), 199-204.
  21. Tajirian, F.F., Kelly, J.M. and Aiken, I.D. (1990), "Seismic isolation for advanced nuclear power stations", Earthq. Spectr., 6(2), 371-401.
  22. Tamayo, J.L.P. and Awruch, A.M. (2016), "Numerical simulation of reinforced concrete nuclear containment under extreme loads", Struct. Eng. Mech., 58(5), 799-823.
  23. Whittaker, A., Huang, Y., Mayes, R. and Kennedy, R. (2011), Seismic Isolation of Safety-Related Nuclear Structures, ASCE.