Journal of Information Technology Services (한국IT서비스학회지)

Korea Society of IT Services (한국IT서비스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Priority Analysis on Influential Factors for Software Bid Evaluation in Public Sectors based on Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)

AHP 기법을 활용한 소프트웨어 제안평가요인의 상대적 중요도에 관한 연구 : 발주자와 수주자 비교를 중심으로

  • 김홍진 (숭실대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 조동혁 (숭실대학교 프로젝트경영연구소) ;
  • 안태호 (숭실대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2017.01.21
  • Accepted : 2017.03.10
  • Published : 2017.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, due to the economic recession and increase of ITO (IT Outsourcing), bidding in software industry has been recognized as more competitive and the importance of software bid evaluation for corporate selection is being increased. This study aims to analyze and prioritize influential factors in the software bid evaluation criteria which is adopted as the main evaluation model of national software businesses by Ministry of Science. The priority was developed by AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) through pair-wise comparison. For the analysis, this study developed analysis model for AHP and conducted survey of experts who have work experience for more than 10 years in the IT industry. As the result of analysis, weighted factors in the evaluation criteria were deduced and differences of priority factors between purchaser and bidder were investigated. The analysis showed differences of view point in the bidding process. With these results, this study suggests how to write a proposal strategically and effectively in perspective of the purchaser. It is expected that priority factors will be adopted in strategic proposals in both bidder and purchaser. For purchaser, the priority will be adopted to select reliable bidder. So, we expect that the priority factors will be used to get more values for both bidder and purchaser in their business atmosphere.

Keywords

References

  1. Back, H.C. and P.S. Kang, "A Priority Analysis on Influential Factors for Invigorating Project Management Office(PMO) in Public Sectors based on Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)", J. Soc. Korea Ind. Syst. Eng, Vol.37, No.4, 2014, 42-53. (백형충, 강필성, "계층분석과정을 이용한 공공분야 PMO 제도 활성화 방안 우선순위 분석", 산업경영시스템학회지, 제37권, 제4호, 2014, 42-53.) https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2014.37.4.42
  2. Chalvin, S., "There is No IT Outsourcing without a Transition : An Introduction to ITO Transitions", PMI Virtual Library, 2014, 1-9(Downloaded October 24, 2014).
  3. Djavanshir, G.R., "Surveying the Risks and Benefits of IT Outsourcing", IT Professional, Vol.7, No.6, 2005, 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2005.153
  4. Etnews, "Returning of conglomerate in the public software business, solomon's solution...", 2016. 2. 10., Available at http://www.etnews.com/20160210000046 (Accessed Feb 10. 2017). (전자신문, "공공SW 대기업 복귀, 솔로몬 해법을", http://www.etnews.com/20160210000046, 2017.2.10.)
  5. Kim, H.H., W.C. Lee, Y.C. Oh, and I.H. Yang, "A Neural Network Model of Unfair Prediction by a Committee for IT Proposal", Journal of The Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems, Vol.26, No.1, 2016, 201-202. (김훈희, 이원천, 오연칠, 양인학, "IT제안서에 대한 평가위원의 불공정 예측 신경망 모델", 한국지능시스템학회 학술발표논문집, 제26권, 제1호, 2016, 201-202.)
  6. Kim, B.B. and J.H. Lee, "Technology Evaluation Models for Software Acquisition", Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Vol.19, No.2, 1994, 21-43. (김병록, 이주헌, "소프트웨어 도입을 위한 기술성 평가모형", 한국경영과학회지, 제19권, 제2호, 1994, 21-43.)
  7. Korea Information Technology Service Industry Association, "The Way of Global Competitiveness of IT Service Industry", Research Report of Korea Information Technology Association, 2010. (한국IT서비스산업협회, "IT서비스산업 글로벌 경쟁력 강화방안", 한국IT서비스산업협회 연구 보고서, 2010.)
  8. Kim, S.R. and H.S. Jeon, "Study on Software Vendor Selection Using AHP", MSFE, Vol. 12, No.2, 1995, 15-32. (김승렬, 전희숙, "AHP를 이용한 소프트웨어 외주업체 선정방안에 관한 연구", 경영과학, 제12권, 제2호, 1995, 15-32.)
  9. Kim, K.E. and H.Y. Yoo, "An Evaluation of Software Development Methodology Applicability at Medium and Small Business through AHP", KIIS, Software and Data Eng., Vol.2 No.10, 2013, 691-696. (김규억, 유해영, "소프트웨어 개발방법론 적합도 평가", 정보처리학회논문지. 소프트웨어 및 데이터 공학, 제2권, 제10호, 2013, 691-696.) https://doi.org/10.3745/KTSDE.2013.2.10.691
  10. Kim, J.K., S.I. Kim, and S.Y. Rye, "A Method of Sampling and Validation for Source Selection and Technical Evaluation Indicators in Public Sector", Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 19, No.1, 2011, 203-206. (김정규, 김상일, 류성열, "공공IT제안서 기술 평가지표의 추출 및 검증 기법", 한국컴퓨터정보학회 학술발표논문집, 제19권, 제1호, 2011, 203-206.) https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2014.19.1.203
  11. Kim, C.S. and K.K. Cho, "A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Proposals of National Defense Core-Technology R&D Projects", IE interfaces, Vol. 21, No.1, 2008, 96-108. (김찬수, 조규갑, "국방핵심기술 연구개발의 제안서 평가를 위한 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", 산업공학, 제21권, 제1호, 2008, 96-108.)
  12. Kim, H.J., Skill of Proposal, Freelec, 2014. (김홍진, 제안의 기술, 프리렉출판사, 2014.)
  13. Kim, J.K. and S.Y. Ryu, "A Study on Refinement of Evaluation Category and Evaluation Criteria for Relative Evaluation of Software Technologies", Proceedings of Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, Vol.38, No.2, 2011, 155-158. (김정규, 류성열 "소프트웨어 기술서의 상대적 평가를 위한 평가부문 세분화 및 평가기중에 대한 연구", 한국정보과학회 2011 가을 학술발표논문집, 제38권, 제2호, 2011, 155-158.)
  14. Lee, J.M. and H.W. Jung, "A Selection Method of Software Internal Quality Characteristics using the Analytic Hierarchy Process", Journal of KIISE(B), Vol.24, No.6, 1997, 640-649. (이종무, 정호원, "AHP를 이용한 소프트웨어 내부품질특성의 선정방법", 정보과학회논문지(B), 제24권, 제6호, 1997, 640-649.)
  15. Lee, K.S. and J.M. Baek, "A Study on the Development of ERP for Small to Midsize Enterprises", Journal of The Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 1997, 704-707. (이교상, 백종명, "중소기업형 ERP 구현에 관한 연구", 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 춘계공동학술대회 발표논문집, 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회, 1997, 704-707.)
  16. Lee, S.H. and S.B. Park, "Development of a Webbased AHP Software for Decision Making", The Research Institute of Industrial Technology Development, Vol22, 2008, 151-157. (이승훈, 박성빈, "의사결정을 위한 Web 기반 AHP기법 소프트웨어 개발", 산업기술연구지, 제22권, 2008, 151-157.)
  17. Ministry of Science, "Software evaluation criteria(2017-14)", 2017, Available at http://www.law.go.kr (Accessed Feb 5, 2017). (미래창조과학부고시 제2017-14호, "소프트웨어 기술성 평가기준", http://www.law.go.kr, 2017. 2. 5.)
  18. Money Today, "Construction industry related license, Shirked by Kim Young-Ran law... Business interruption is best", 2016. 8. 25. Available at http://www.mt.co.kr (Accessed Feb 2, 2017). (머니투데이, "인허가 많은 건설업, '김영란법'에 초긴장...영업중단이 최선", 2016, http://www.mt.co.kr, 2016. 8. 25.)
  19. NIPA, "Software Technical Evaluation Guide", 2011. 10, Available at https://www.nipa.kr (Downloaded Feb 5. 2017). (정보통신산업진흥원, 소프트웨어 기술성 평가기준적용 가이드, 2011. 10, Available at https://www.nipa.kr, 2017. 02. 05.)
  20. Saaty, T.L., "How to make a decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, Vol.48, No.1, 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  21. Yu, I.H. and K.R. Kim, "Development of an Operation Model for Technical Proposal-Based Tender of Public Construction Projects", Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.9, No.2, 2008, 136-145. (유일한, 김경래, "공공건설공사의 기술제안형 입찰 운영모델 개발", 한국건설관리학회논문집, 제9권, 제2호, 2008, 136-145.)