DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quantitative analysis of oral disease-causing bacteria in saliva among bacterial culture, SYBRgreen qPCR and MRT-PCR method

타액내 구강질환 원인 균의 세균배양법, SYBR green qPCR법, MRT-PCR법 간의 정량분석

  • Park, Yong-Duk (Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Hye-Young (Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Park, Bok-Ri (Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Cho, Ara (Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Kie (Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jang, Jong-Hwa (Department of Dental Hygiene Science, Hanseo University)
  • 박용덕 (조선대학교 치과대학 예방치과교실) ;
  • 오혜영 (조선대학교 치과대학 예방치과교실) ;
  • 박복리 (조선대학교 치과대학 예방치과교실) ;
  • 조아라 (조선대학교 치과대학 예방치과교실) ;
  • 김동기 (조선대학교 치과대학 예방치과교실) ;
  • 장종화 (한서대학교 치위생학과)
  • Received : 2017.03.02
  • Accepted : 2017.04.14
  • Published : 2017.04.30

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare SYBR Green qPCR, TaqMan, and bacterial selective medium cultures for accurate quantitative analysis of oral microorganisms. Methods: The SYBR Green method is widely used to analyze the total amount of oral microorganisms in oral saliva. However, in this study, MTR-PCR method based on TaqMan method was performed using newly developed primers and probes. In addition, it was designed to confirm the detection agreement of bacteria among bacteria detection method. Results: As a result of MRT-PCR and SYBR Green qPCR analysis, more than 40 times (0.9-362.9 times) bacterium was detected by MRT-PCR. In addition, more bacteria were detected in saliva in the order of MRT-PCR, SYBR Green qPCR, and bacterium culture, and the results of MRB-PCR and SYBR Green qPCR showed the highest agreement. The agreement between the three methods for detecting P. intermedia was similar between 71.4 and 88.6%, but the agreement between MRT-PCR and SYBR Green qPCR was 80% for S. mutans. Among them, the number of total bacteria, P. intermedia and S. mutans bacteria in saliva was higher than that of SYBR Green qPCR method, and bacterium culture method by MRT-PCR method. P. intermedia and S. mutans in saliva were detected by MRT-PCR and MRT-PCR in 88.6% of cases, followed by the SYBR Green qPCR method (80.0%). Conclusions: The SYBR Green qPCR method is the same molecular biology method, but it can not analyze the germs at the same time. Bacterial culturing takes a lot of time if there is no selective culture medium. Therefore, the MRT-PCR method using newly developed primers and probes is considered to be the best method.

Keywords

References

  1. Slots J. Subgingival microflora and periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1979;6(5):351-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1979.tb01935.x
  2. Haraszthy VI, Zambon JJ, Trevisan M, Zeid M, Genco RJ. Identification of periodontal pathogens in atheromatous plaques. J Periodontol 2000;71(10):1554-60. https://doi.org/10.1902/ jop.2000.71.10.1554
  3. Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Microbial etiological agents of destructive periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 1994;5:78-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00020.x
  4. Darveau RP, Tanner A, Page RC. The microbial challenge in periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 1997;14:12-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00190.x
  5. Boutaga K, van Winkelhoff AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Savelkoul PH. Comparison of real-time PCR and culture for detection of porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingivalplaque samples. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41(11):4950-4. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.11.4950-4954.2003
  6. Nadkarni MA, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N. Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 2002;148(Pt 1):257-66. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-1-257
  7. Kim JH, Yoo SY, Lim SA, Kook JK, Lim SS, Park AH, Hwang HK. Identification of putative pathogens iv acute endodontic insfections by PCR based on 16s rDNA. J Korean Acad Opera Dent 2003;28(2):178-83. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.2.178
  8. Kim MJ, Min JB, Lim AS, Kook JK. Strain-specific PCR Primers for the detection of prevotella intermedia ATCC 49046. Int J Oral Biol 2011;36(2):79-82.
  9. Horz HP, Vianna ME, Gomes BP, Conrads G. Evaluation of universal probes and primer sets for assessing total bacterial load in clinical samples: General implications and practical use in endodontic antimicrobial therapy. J Clin microbiol 2005;43(10): 5332-7. https://doi.org/10.1128/ JCM.43.10.5332-5337.2005
  10. Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI, Metoz F. ESPript: Analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics 1999;15(4):305-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/15.4.305
  11. Lee JW, Kim MB, Park BR, Yoon YM. Simultaneous detecting composition of multiple oral disease bacteria with multiplex real-time PCR and method thereof. Patent ․ Registration No. 1017060700000 (2017.02.07)
  12. Park SN, Park JY, Kook JK. Development of quantitative real-time PCR primers for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Int J Oral Biol 2011;36(1):1-6.
  13. Dymock D, Weightman AJ, Scully C. Wade WG. Molecular analysis of micro-ora associated with dentoalveolar abscesses. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:537-42.
  14. Kroes I, Lepp PW, Relman DA. Bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96(25):14547-52. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.25.14547
  15. Park SN, Lim YK, Kook JK. Development of quantitative real-time PCR primers for detecting 42 oral bacterial species. Arch Microbiol 2013;195(7):473-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203- 013-0896-4
  16. Reardon-Robinson ME, Wu C, Mishra A, Chang C, Bier N, Das A, et al. Pilus hijacking by a bacterial coaggregation factor critical for oral biofilm development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111(10):3835-40. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321417111
  17. Martin FE, Nadkarni MA, Jacques NA, Hunter N. Quantitative microbiological study of human carious dentine by culture and real-time PCR: association of anaerobes with histopathological changes in chronic pulpitis. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(5):1698-704. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.5.1698-1704.2002
  18. Ali RW, Bakken V, Nilsen R, Skaug N. Comparative detection frequency of 6 putative periodontal pathogens in Sudanese and Norwegian adult periodontitis patients. J Periodontol 1994;65(11):1046-52. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.11.1046
  19. Matto J, Saarela M, Alaluusua S, Oja V, Jousimies-Somer H, Asikainen S. Detection of porphyromonas gingivalisfrom saliva by PCR by using a simple sample-processing method. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36(1):157-60.
  20. Yano, A, Kaneko N, Ida H, Yamaguchi T, Hanada N. Real-time PCR for quantification of streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002;217(1):23-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574- 6968.2002.tb11451.x
  21. Jervoe-Storm, PM, Koltzscher M, Falk W, Dorfler A, Jepsen S. Comparison of culture and real-time PCR for detection and quantification of five putative periodontopathogenic bacteria in subgingival plaque samples. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32(7):778-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1600-051X.2005.00740.x
  22. Verner C, Lemaitre P, Daniel A, Giumelli B, Lakhssassi N, Sixou M. Carpegen(R) real-time polymerase chain reaction vs. anaerobic culture for periodontal pathogen identification. Oral microbiol Immunol 2006;21(6):341-6. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2006.00297.x
  23. Moon KH, Kwon H. The influence on the recognition for periodontal care to oral microorganism changes in dental implant patients. Int J Clin Prev Dent 2016;12(4):221-8. https:// doi.org/10.15236/ijcpd.2016.12.4.221