DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Applyment Selection Standards of Physical Computing Teaching Aids for Elementary SW Education According to the 2015 Revised Curriculum

2015 개정 교육과정의 초등학교 소프트웨어 교육을 위한 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교구 선택 기준 개발 및 적용

  • Lee, Young-jae (Dept. of Computer Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Jeon, Hyung-gi (Dept. of Computer Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Kim, Yungsik (Dept. of Computer Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 이영재 (한국교원대학교 컴퓨터교육과) ;
  • 전형기 (한국교원대학교 컴퓨터교육과) ;
  • 김영식 (한국교원대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2017.07.07
  • Accepted : 2017.08.02
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

This study derived optimized teaching aids that use the physical computing method as the solution for effective software education at the elementary level. We set standard for selecting physical computing teaching aids in elementary-level by gathering the opinions from previous studies and think tanks and then applied the standard to some aids and choose one. We also made lesson plan and tried it to the experimental group. Subsequently, students' logical thinking skills showed a statistically significant improvement in terms of the t-test. Also, in the analysis of the effect size, it was shown to have a positive influence on the improvement of the students' logical thinking skills. Additionally, survey of satisfaction evaluation from the students showed that the teaching aid selection standard was effective in selecting suitable teaching aids for elementary students and that the classroom activities utilizing physical computing teaching aids were at a suitable level for elementary students.

본 연구는 2015 개정 교육과정에서 실시될 초등학생의 효율적인 소프트웨어 교육을 위해 활용될 수 있는 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교구의 선택 기준을 개발하는 데 목적을 두고 있다. 이를 위해 교육용 교구에 대한 이론, 연구사례와 전문가 집단의 델파이 설문을 통해 초등학교에서 소프트웨어 교육에 활용할 수 있는 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교구의 선택기준을 제안하였으며, 현재 상용화된 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교구들 중 제안한 교구 선택 기준을 가장 충족하는 교구를 선택하고, 관련 교수 학습내용을 구성하여 실험집단에 투입하였다. 연구 결과, 제안한 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교구 선택 기준을 반영한 교수 학습 활동이 학습자의 논리적 사고력을 유의미하게 향상시킨다는 것이 t검증을 통해 확인되었고, 효과크기 측면에서도 학습자의 논리적 사고력 향상에 긍정적인 영향을 미친 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 학습자 만족도 조사를 통해 제안된 교구 선택 기준이 초등학생의 소프트웨어 교육에 활용할 수 있는 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교구의 선택에 있어 효과적이며, 이를 활용한 교수 학습 활동이 초등학생의 수준에 적합함이 증명되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn Ki Sub, Park Gwangryeol (2014). The Recognition of The Elementary School Teacher On Robot Education in Elementary School Curriculum. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education. 20(2). pp. 203-225. https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2014.20.2.203
  2. Bärbel Inhelder, Jean Piget, Anne Parsons, Stanley Milgram (1958). The Growth od Logical Thinking From Childhood to Adolescence. Basic Book.
  3. C. H. Lawshe. (1975) A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. 28, 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  4. Essa, E. V (1999). Introduction to early childhood education(3rd ed.). NY : Delmer Publishing.
  5. Gerald W. Recktenwald (2011). Using Arduino as a platform for programming, design and measurement in a freshman engineering coursr. American Society of Engineering Education.
  6. Han Jeong-Hye, Park Ju-hyun, Jo Miheon, Park Ill-Woo, Kim Jin-Oh (2011). Learning with a Robot for STEAM in Elementary School. Journal fo the Korean Association of information Education 15(3) pp. 483-492.
  7. Jeon Yun Ju, Song Jeong Beom, Lee Tae Wuk (2010). study on Programming Learning by textbook content of Practical Arts Education In Elementary. Journal of The Korean Association of Computer Education. 14(1). pp. 121-124.
  8. Kang Jong Pyo(2004). A Study on the Education of Robot in Elementary School. Journal of Korean practical arts education. 16(4). pp. 97-113.
  9. Kim Byung Soo (2007). The Analysis of the Effectiveness of e-Thinking Tools in CPS-Based Instruction : Focus on the 5th Grade Social Studies in Elementary Schools. [dissertation]. Kon-Kuk university.
  10. Kim Chan Woong (2014). Application of Physical Computing Using Arduino in Computer Science related Subjects in Pulbic Elementary Curriculum. [dissertation]. Gyeongin National University of Education.
  11. Kim Jin Sook et.al (2015). Development of SW Education Teaching and Learning Model. Commissioned research. CR 2015-35. Korea Education & Research Information Service, Korean Educational Development Institute.
  12. Kim Jung Sook, Park Jin Ah, Kim Jung Min(2014). Research report 2014-03 A study of teaching material quality management methods on kindergarten. Korea institute of Child care and Education.
  13. Kim Seong Won, Lee Young Joon (2015). Korean Elementary teacher's attitude toward robot. Journal of Information Technology Education. 11(1) pp 22-35. Institute of Information Education, Korea National University of Education.
  14. Kim So Youn (2011). A study on teacher's classroom management strategy according to awareness of developmental characteristics of elementary school students. [dissertation]. Seoul national university of education.
  15. Korea Education & Research Information Service. SW education-linked robot use lesson casebook (2016). KERIS : Author
  16. Lee Jae-Boon et. al. (2001). A study on the analysis of developmental level about the cognitive and affective characteristics : focused on the 1st-9th grade students (II). Research report RR 2001-2. Korea Educational Development Institute.
  17. Lee Young Jae, Kim Yungsik (2015). A study of Elementary teachers' perceptions, competencies and environmental about SW education according to the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of Information Technology Education. 11(1) pp 8-16. Institute of Information Education, Korea National University of Education.
  18. Lee Young Joo (2010). (The) Effect of Scratch Programming Education on Logical Thinking. Choong-Buk university.
  19. Miguel A. Rubio, Carolina Manoso Herro, Angel Perez de Madrid y Pablo (2013). Using Arduino to enhance computer programming courses in science and engineering. 5th international Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies.
  20. Ministry of Education (2015). Particulars of 2015 Revised Curriculum : Practical arts(Technology, Home Life).
  21. Ministry of Education (2015). Software education management guidelines.
  22. Oh Yeon Joo, Ahn Eun Suk, Kim Hye Suk, Lee Eun Sang, Lee Kyung Sil, Ko Young Joo, Lee Myeong Hee (2003). Teaching Material Theory and practice Focused on Production process. Seoul: Changjisa.
  23. O'Sullivan, D., Igoe, T. (2004). Physical computing, Thomson.
  24. Treffinger D. J., Isaksen S. G., Dorval K. B. (2005). Creative problem solving: An introduction, 4th ed., Prufrock Press, Texas, pp 1-90.

Cited by

  1. 피지컬 컴퓨팅 기반의 인터랙티브 프로토타이핑 프로그래밍 학습모형 개발 및 적용 vol.22, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.3.297
  2. 2015 개정 초등 교육과정의 SW교육을 위한 피지컬 컴퓨팅 기반 교구 평가 준거 개발 vol.21, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2018.21.5.004