Journal of Energy Engineering (에너지공학)

The Korean Society for Energy (한국에너지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Event-based Safety Culture Weakness Evaluation methodology in NPPs

사건기반 안전문화 취약요소 평가방법론 정립

  • 김영갑 (한국수력원자력(주) 중앙연구원) ;
  • 허남용 (한국수력원자력(주) 중앙연구원) ;
  • 박정진 (한국수력원자력(주) 중앙연구원)
  • Received : 2017.05.19
  • Accepted : 2017.06.15
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Safety culture degradation signs in nuclear power plants with complex and diverse systems can lead to their equipments performance deterioration. If these signs are neglected, they become potential causes of accidents. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor safety culture in the point of view of organization and management as well as to evaluate safety performance of nuclear power plants. Therefore, This paper suggested a methodology to evaluate safety culture weakness contributing the accidents' root causes in the case accidents occur at nuclear power plants. After reviewing methodologies using at domestic and international industry, the methodology suitable for domestic nuclear power plants was determined.

복잡하고 다양한 계통으로 구성된 원자력발전소에서의 안전문화 저하 징후는 설비의 안전성능 저하를 유발할 수 있으며, 이에 대한 적절한 후속조치가 없을 경우 대형 사고를 발생시킬 수 있는 잠재적 원인이 된다. 따라서 원전의 안전성능에 대한 감시와 더불어 조직 및 관리측면에서의 안전문화를 모니터링 함으로써 안전문화 저하 징후를 파악할 필요가 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 원전 문제점 혹은 사건이 발생할 경우, 설비 측면보다는 조직의 안전문화관점에서 사건의 근본원인에 기여한 안전문화 취약요소를 평가하여 개선할 수 있는 사건기반 평가 방법론을 정립하였다. 이를 위해 국내 외 산업계에서 활용되고 있는 평가사례들을 검토하여 국내 원전 실정에 적합한 평가 방법론을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. IAEA, 2016, OSART Independent Safety Culture Assessment(ISCA) Guidelines, IAEA Services Series 32, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
  2. IAEA, 2013, REGULATORY OVERSIGHT OF SAFETY CULTURE IN NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS, IAEA-TECDOC-1707, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
  3. U.S. NRC, 2006, Reactor Oversight Process, NUREG-1649, Rev.4, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
  4. INPO, 2009. Principles for a Strong Nuclear Safety Culture, The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, USA.
  5. INPO, 2009. Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Process Manual: Overview of the NSCA Survey Process Tab C1 Rev.0, The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, USA.
  6. KINS, 2016, Development of Regulatory Infrastructure for the Oversight of Safety Culture, KINS/RR-1134 Vol.6.
  7. Patrick Hudson, 1999, Safety Culture-Theory and Practice, RTO HFM workshop on"The Human Factor in System Reliability - Is Human Performance Predictable?", Siena.
  8. Shappell, S.A., et al., 2000, The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS, DOT/ FAA/AM-00/7, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration.
  9. Berg H.P., et al., 2001, SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND EVENT-BASED SAFETY CULTURE ASSESSMENT, Berg H.P., Ernst B.
  10. INPO, 2013, Traits of a Healthy Nuclear Safety Culture, INPO 12-012, The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, USA.
  11. U.S. NRC, 2014, ASPECTS WITHIN THE CROSSCUTTING AREAS, MANUAL CHAPTER 0310, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
  12. U.S. NRC, 2014, Safety Culture Common Language, NUREG-2165, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
  13. INPO, 2015, Leadership and Team Effectiveness Attributes, INPO 15-005, The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, USA.
  14. WANO, 2016, WANO Event Report, WER ATL 16-0150, World Association of Nuclear Operators.
  15. WANO, 2016, WANO Event Report, WER ATL 16-0226, World Association of Nuclear Operators.
  16. WANO, 2016, WANO Event Report, WER ATL 16-0349, World Association of Nuclear Operators.
  17. WANO, 2016, WANO Event Report, WER ATL 16-0552, World Association of Nuclear Operators.
  18. KHNP, 2015, Development of Definition, Attribute and Consumer-Driven Contents of KHNP Nuclear Safety Culture, Technical Report.
  19. Thomas L. Saaty., et al., 2008, Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, RWS Publications, ISBN 978-1-888603-08-8.
  20. U.S. NRC, 2011, NRC Inspection Manual, Inspection Procedure 95001, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.