DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

BSC와 AHP를 활용한 IoT 인프라 도입 의사결정에 관한 연구: 전자가격라벨(ESL)을 중심으로

A Study on Introduction of IoT Infrastructure based on BSC and AHP: Focusing on Electronic Shelf Label

  • Yang, Jae Yong (Department of Business Consulting, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Sang Ryul (Department of Business Administration, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2017.06.07
  • 심사 : 2017.07.31
  • 발행 : 2017.08.31

초록

전자가격라벨(ESL)은 상품진열대에 부착되어 있는 종이가격라벨의 대체재로서 오프라인 소매매장의 혁신을 선도할 유통 IoT 인프라로 주목받고 있다. 일반적으로 대체재 성격의 제품도입 시 기업은 기존 제품 대비 투자비용의 효율성이나 운영비용 절감 등의 재무적 요인을 우선적으로 고려하는 경향이 있다. 그러나 의사결정과정에서 재무적 요인만 고려할 경우 기업전략과 연결된 다양한 가치와 이해관계자들의 요구사항을 제대로 반영하지 못할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 전자가격라벨과 같은 IoT 인프라의 도입 의사결정과정에서 고려해야 할 평가요인들에 관해 BSC의 4대 관점(재무, 고객, 프로세스, 성장)을 기반으로 8개 평가항목(투자비용, 운영비용, 품질수준, 고객관리, 업무효율성, 유지보수, 기능확장성, 매장이미지)을 선정하고, AHP(분석적 계층 프로세스)를 사용하여 국내 중소형 슈퍼마켓의 직원들을 대상으로 평가항목의 우선도를 측정하였다. 연구의 결과로 가격라벨의 대안 채택을 위한 평가항목 중에서 고객, 학습과 성장, 내부 비즈니스 프로세스, 재무관점 순으로 우선도가 산출되었고, 전자가격라벨이 종이가격라벨보다 높은 중요도로 지지되었다. 대부분의 선행연구에서 재무관점의 평가항목들의 우선도가 높았던 것과 달리 학습과 성장, 고객관점의 평가항목들이 상대적으로 높게 나타났고, 특히 직군별, 가격라벨 교체업무 연관 여부에 의해 구분된 응답자 그룹들 간에 8개 세부평가 항목들의 우선도가 다르게 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 ESL의 도입을 고려하는 기업(유통매장)과 ESL을 공급하는 기업(제조사 및 서비스 사업자) 모두에게 시사점을 제공해 줄 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

The Electronic Shelf Label (ESL) is an alternative to the paper price label attached to merchandise shelves and is attracting attention as a retail IoT infrastructure that will lead the innovation of offline retail outlets. In general, when introducing a substitute product, the company tends to consider the financial factors such as the efficiency of the investment cost compared to the existing product or the reduction of the operating cost. However, considering only financial factors in the decision-making process, it may not properly reflect the various values associated with corporate strategy and the requirements of stakeholders. In this study, 8 evaluation items (Investment Cost, Operating Cost, Quality Level, Customer Management, Job Efficiency, Maintenance, Functional Expandability, and Store Image) based on BSC's 4 perspectives (Financial, Customer, Internal Business Process, Learning & Growth), and using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to measure the priorities of evaluation items for domestic small supermarket employees. As a result of the research, priority was given in order of Customer, Learning & Growth, Internal Business Process, and Financial aspects among the evaluation items for adopting the price label, and the electronic price label was supported with higher importance than the paper price label. In contrast to the priorities of the financial aspects of most prior studies, the items of Learning & growth and customer perspectives have relatively high priorities. In particular, respondents classified by job group, The priorities of the 8 evaluation items were different among the groups. These results are expected to provide implications for both companies (retail outlets) and ESL providers (manufacturers and service providers) who are considering the introduction of ESL.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, Y. Y., Jin, K. J., Ha, H. K., “A Study on Criteria of Selecting Small Package Express Service Provider for e-Commerce Companies with the AHP,” Korea Logistics Review, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 45-62, 2008.
  2. Drubin, C., “Electronic Shelf Labels Revenue to Reach $2 Billion by 2019,” Microwave Journal, Vol. 17, No. 10, pp. 51, 2014.
  3. Garaus, M. and Wolfsteiner, E., "Shoppers' Acceptance and Perceptions of Electronic Shelf Labels," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, pp. 3687-3692, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.030
  4. Grembergen, W. V., Saull, R., and Haes, S. D., “Linking the IT Balanced Scorecard to the Business Objectives at a Major Canadian Financial group,” Journal of Information Technology Cases & Applications, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 23-50, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2003.10856015
  5. Gu, J. H. and Choi, J. I., “A Study on the Selection of Technology Development Supporting Business by AHP Method in a BSC Viewpoint,” Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol. 13, No. 8, pp. 3371-3380, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.8.3371
  6. Ji, Y. C., Ahn, J. J., Lee, J. H., and Kim, S. H., "The Selection Method of Green Suppliers Based on AHP and BSC," Fall Conference of Korea IE Society, pp. 646-658, 2009.
  7. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P., "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic Management System," Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., pp. 75-85, 1996.
  8. Kim, J. S., "A Review on the Basic Variables of the Organizational Buying Behavior Research," Collection Of Dissertations, Vol. 23, pp. 705-733, 1996.
  9. Kim, S. J., “An Empirical Study on the Evaluation of Supplier Selection Factors Using the AHP,” Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 169-177, 2007.
  10. Ko, I. S. and Lee, C. S., “A Study on the Evaluation Model for CMS using the AHP,” Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 123-137, 2004.
  11. Kwon, M. Y., Koo, B. J., and Lee, K. H., "Establishing the Importance Weight Model of IT Investment Evaluation Criteria through AHP Analysis," Information System Review, Vol. 7, pp. 265-285, 2005.
  12. Lee, D. H., “A Development of BSC model for Evaluating B2B Network Project in Korea,” Journal of KECRA, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 157-174, 2010.
  13. Lee, J. B., Hong, Y. J., and Chang, Y. H., “A Case Study on the Correlation between the Quantitative and the Qualitative Evaluation of IT Investment Performance,” Information System Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 149-168, 2007.
  14. Lee, S. S. and Cho, C. W., “Study on a Web-based Business Process Evaluation Model for BPM using BSC and Fuzzy AHP,” IE interfaces, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 26-37, 2009.
  15. Park, J. S. and Jang, B. J., "Electronic Shelf Label System Employing a Visible Light Identification Link," IEEE, pp. 1-4, 2016.
  16. Rigby, D. K., "Digital-Physical Mashups," Harvard Business Review, September, pp. 84-92, 2014.
  17. Saaty, T. L., “Priority Setting in Complex Problems,” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 140-155, 1983.
  18. Schwab, K., "The Fourth Industrial Revolution," Penguin Books Ltd.. London, United Kingdom, 2017.
  19. Seo, K. K., “A Combined Fuzzy AHP and BSC Model based Green Supplier Selection Problem,” Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 63-69, 2011.
  20. Seo, K. K., “A Selection Problem of SCM System based on Fuzzy AHP and BSC,” Journal of the Korea Management Engineers Society, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 49-62, 2011.
  21. So, S. H., “Fuzzy AHP Approach for the Logistics Outsourcing Decision in Supply Chain Management,” Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 1631-1651, 2006.
  22. Wei, M. and Hsieh, Y., "An Application Sstudy of Electronic Sshelf Label on Cultural Creation Merchandise," Springer, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 2016, No. 369, pp. 515-522, 2016.
  23. Yoon, J. G., “Selection of Supply Chain Partner in Auto Industry by using AHP Method,” Journal of the Korean Institute of Plant Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 13-30, 2004.
  24. Yu, J. N., “The Suggestion of Electronic Shelf Label System for Smart Shopping,” KSCI Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 25-29, 2011.
  25. Yun, H. J. and Lee, I. K., “A Study on the Interference Impact between Wi-Fi Celluar Phone and Electronic Shelf Label system of Tag,” Journal of Satellite, Information and Communications, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 101-106, 2014.