DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predicting the Greenhouse Air Humidity Using Artificial Neural Network Model Based on Principal Components Analysis

PCA에 기반을 둔 인공신경회로망을 이용한 온실의 습도 예측

  • Owolabi, Abdulhameed B. (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong W (Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jayasekara, Shanika N. (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyun W. (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2017.07.26
  • Accepted : 2017.09.12
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

A model was developed using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA), to accurately predict the air humidity inside an experimental greenhouse located in Daegu (latitude $35.53^{\circ}N$, longitude $128.36^{\circ}E$, and altitude 48 m), South Korea. The weather parameters, air temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, and carbon dioxide inside and outside the greenhouse were monitored and measured by mounted sensors. Through the PCA of the data samples, three main components were used as the input data, and the measured inside humidity was used as the output data for the ALYUDA forecaster software of the ANN model. The Nash-Sutcliff Model Efficiency Coefficient (NSE) was used to analyze the difference between the experimental and the simulated results, in order to determine the predictive power of the ANN software. The results obtained revealed the variables that affect the inside air humidity through a sensitivity analysis graph. The measured humidity agreed well with the predicted humidity, which signifies that the model has a very high accuracy and can be used for predictions based on the computed $R^2$ and NSE values for the training and validation samples.

Keywords

References

  1. Bakker, J., 1991. Analysis of humidity effects on growth and production of glasshouse fruit vegetables. PhD Thesis, Wageningen.
  2. Carvajal, F., E. Crisanto, F. J. Anguilar, F. Aquera, and A. Aguilar, 2006. Greenhouses detection using an artificial neural network with a very high resolution satellite image. ISPRS Technical Commission II Symposium, Vienna: pp.12-14.
  3. Ehret, D., D. Hill, A. Raworth, and B. Estergaard, 2008. Artificial neural network modelling to predict cuticle cracking in greenhouse peppers and tomatoes. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 61: 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.09.011
  4. Fen, H. and M. Chengwei, 2010. Modeling greenhouse air humidity by means of artificial neural network and principal components analysis. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 71: S19-S23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2009.07.011
  5. Ferreira, P., A. Faria, and E. Ruano, 2002. Neural network models in greenhouse air temperature prediction. Neurocomputing 43: 51-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00620-8
  6. Fourati, F. and M. Chtourou, 2007. A greenhouse control with feed-forward and recurrent neural networks. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 15: 1016-1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2007.06.001
  7. Julien, A., L. Emmanuel, A. Clément, A. Rufin, and A. Brice, 2013. Modeling solar energy transfer through roof material in Africa Sub-Saharan Regions. ISRN Renewable Energy 34(7): 632-645.
  8. Okunlola, A. I., 2013. Glasshouse production of vegetables and ornamentals for agricultural productivity in Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1(4): 113-119.
  9. Owolabi, A., A. Olaniyan, J. Awu, and S. Oyewole, 2016. Predicting the level of postharvest losses of rice along the food value chain using artificial neural network. Current Research on Agriculture and Life Science 34(1): 41-47.
  10. Pahlavan, R., M. Omid, and A. Akram, 2012. Energy input-output analysis and application of artificial neural networks for predicting greenhouse basil production. Energy 37: 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.055
  11. Ruano, E., M. Crispim, E. Conceicao, and R. Lucio, 2006. Prediction of building's temperature using neural networks models. Energy and Buildings 38: 682-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.09.007
  12. Seginer, I., 1997. Some artificial neural network applications to greenhouse environmental control. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 18: 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(97)00028-8
  13. Trigo, M. and P. Palutikof, 1999. Simulation of daily temperatures for climate change scenarios over Portugal: a neural network model approach. Clim Res 13: 45-59. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr013045
  14. Wilson, D. and T. Martinez, 2003. The general inefficiency of batch training for gradient descent learning. Neural Networks 16: 1429-1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(03)00138-2