대한화학회지 (Journal of the Korean Chemical Society)

  • 제61권5호
  • /
  • Pages.263-276
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1017-2548(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-8530(eISSN)
대한화학회 (Korean Chemical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

개방형 탐구를 경험한 예비과학교사의 과학 지식의 본성에 대한 이해와 과학 탐구에 대한 태도 변화

A Study on the Understanding about Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Attitude toward Scientific Inquiry of Pre-service Science Teacher through Open Inquiry

  • Cho, JeHee (Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Woo, Ae Ja (Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2017.05.01
  • 심사 : 2017.08.16
  • 발행 : 2017.10.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 예비과학교사들의 개방형 탐구 경험이 과학 지식의 본성에 대한 이해와 과학 탐구에 대한 태도에 어떠한 영향을 주는지 알아보았다. 서울 소재의 사범대학 내 과학교육과에서 개설된 '탐구화학실험' 수업을 수강하는 학생 40명을 대상으로 한 학기 동안 10개의 주제로 개방형 탐구 실험을 진행하였다. 개방형 탐구 실험은 제시된 현상을 관찰한 후 조별로 탐구문제를 설정하여 가설을 세우고, 직접 실험을 설계하고 수행하여 결론을 도출하는 방식으로 진행되었다. 학생들의 과학 지식의 본성에 대한 이해와 과학 탐구에 대한 태도 변화를 알아보기 위하여 세 차례에 걸친 검사지와 개인 면담 자료를 활용하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 과학 지식의 본성에 대한 이해는 통계적으로 유의미한 향상을 보였다(p<.05). 하위 영역 중에서는 창의성, 초도덕성, 사회성 영역에서 유의미한 변화가 나타났다. 이 외에도 개인 면담을 통해서 과학 지식의 주관성에 대한 이해에 영향을 미친 것이 관찰되었다. 둘째, 과학 탐구에 대한 태도는 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보였다(p<.05). 학생들이 개방형 탐구를 경험한 초반에는 과학 탐구에 대한 태도가 다소 부정적이었으나 계속해서 경험할수록 긍정적인 태도가 나타났다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the understanding of nature of scientific knowledge and attitudes toward scientific inquiry of pre-service science teachers experienced open inquiry. The study was conducted in 10 sessions of open inquiry-based chemistry experiment. The subjects were 40 pre-service science teachers recruited from the experiment class. They received pre-test, mid-test, post-test on understanding nature of scientific knowledge and attitudes toward scientific inquiry of open inquiry activities. 20 pre-service science teachers among them participated in the interview. The results of this study are as follows. First, there was a significant difference in pre-service science teachers' understanding of the nature of the scientific knowledge (p<.05). In particular, understanding of creativity and sociality parts improved gradually. Second, pre-service science teachers' attitude toward scientific inquiry had changed negatively until the middle of the semester, and then changed positively later. The post-test score was significantly higher than the mid-test score (p<.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Education. Science Curriculum. Notice No. 2015-74, 2015.
  2. Kim, B. K.; Kown. J. S. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 1994, 14, 251.
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Science-a process approach?. Washington, DC: 1990.
  4. Anderson, R. D. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2002, 13, 1. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
  5. Driver, R.; Newton, P.; Osborne, J. Science education, 2000, 84, 287. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
  6. Kim, H. K.; Song, J. W. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2003, 23, 254.
  7. Han, S. J.; Choi, S. U.; Noh, T. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2012, 32, 82. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.082
  8. Park, G. N.; Kim, Y. S. Journal of Science Education, 2007, 31, 1.
  9. Yang, I. H.; Jeong, J. W.; Hur, M.; Kim, S. M. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2006, 26, 342.
  10. Wellington, J. J. Practical Work in School Science: Which Way Now?; Routledge: 2002.
  11. Bell, R.; Blair, L. M.; Crawford, N. A.; Lederman, N. G. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2003, 40, 487. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10086
  12. Hofstein, A.; Lunetta, V. Science Education, 2004, 88, 28. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
  13. Lee, H. C.; Lee, J. H. Journal of Science Education, 2010, 34, 405. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2010.34.2.405
  14. Richmond, G.; Striley, J. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1996, 33, 839. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<839::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X
  15. Martin-Hansen, L. The Science Teacher, 2002, 69, 34.
  16. Willison, J.; O'Regan, K. Higher Education Research and Development, 2007, 26, 393. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658609
  17. Zion, M.; Shapira, D.; Slezak, M.; Link, E.; Bashan, N.; Brumer, M.; Mendelovici, R. Journal of Biological Education, 2004, 38, 59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655903
  18. Hofstein, A.; Lunetta, V. Review of Educational Research, 1982, 52, 201. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052002201
  19. Sandoval, W. Science Education, 2005, 89, 634. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
  20. Schwartz, R. S.; Lederman, N. G.; Crawford, B. A. Science Education, 2004, 88, 610. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128
  21. Kim, M. K.; Kim, H. B. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2008, 28, 565.
  22. Kim, J. Y.; Kang, S. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2007, 27, 169.
  23. Martin-Dunlop, C. Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9290-5
  24. Song, Y.; Schwenz, R. Journal of College Science Teaching, 2013, 42, 50.
  25. Jeong, D. H.; Bang, J. A.; Choi, C. I.; Choe, W. H. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2006, 50, 385. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2006.50.5.385
  26. Moebius-Clune, B.; Elsevier, I. H.; Crawford, B. A.; Trautmann, N. M., Schindelbeck, R. R.; van Es, H. M. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 2011, 40, 102. https://doi.org/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0019k
  27. Lee, G. H.; Kim, S. J.; Park, J. W. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 2009, 19, 1.
  28. Lim, J. K.; Yang, I. H.; Hong, E. J.; Lim, S. M.; Kim, S. M. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2010, 30, 291.
  29. Berg, A. C.; Bergendahl, C. V.; Lundberg, B. K.; Tibell, L. A. International Journal of Science Education, 2003, 25, 351. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145738
  30. Chatterjee, S.; Williamson, V. M.; McCann, K.; Peck, L. M. Journal of Chemical Education, 2009, 86, 1427. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1427
  31. Windschitl, M. International Journal of Science Education, 2001, 23, 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690121082
  32. Abd-El-Khalick, F.; Lederman, N. G. International Journal of Science Education, 2000, 22, 665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
  33. Akerson, V. L.; Abd-El-Khalick, F.; Lederman, N. G. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2000, 37, 295. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2
  34. Koch, J. Science stories: science methods for elementary and middle school teachers(4th ed.), Cengage Learning: 2010.
  35. Paeng, A. J.; Paik, S. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2005, 25, 146.
  36. Jin, S. H.; Jang, S. H. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 2007, 26, 181.
  37. Cho, S. M.; Baek, J. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2015, 35, 573. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0573
  38. Kim, M. S. The meta-analysis of studies by views on nature of science, Master Dissertation, Graduate School of Education Chonnam National University, Gwnagju, Korea, February, 2008.
  39. Rubba, P. A.; Anderson, H. O. Science Education, 1978, 62, 458.
  40. Lederman, N. G.; Abd-El-Khalick, F.; Bell, R. L.; Schwartz, R. S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2002, 39, 497. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
  41. Knorr C. K. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge; Cambridge University Press: 1999.
  42. Schwartz, R.; Lederman, N. G. International Journal of Science Education, 2008, 30, 727. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701225801
  43. Aikenhead, G. S.; Ryan, A. G. Science Education, 1992, 76, 477. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760503
  44. Lim, J. H.; Kang, S. M.; Kong, Y. T.; Choi, B. S.; Nam, J. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2004, 24, 1143.
  45. Fraser, B. J. TOSRA: Test of Science-Related Attitudes; Ailanby Press: 1981.
  46. Lee, S. H. The Development and Effects of Scientific Experiments for Advancement of Hypothetical Thinking Master Dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea, February, 2005.
  47. Miles, M. B.; Huberman, A. M. Qualitative Data Analyses: A Sourcebook of New Methods; Sage publication: 1984.
  48. Liu, S.; Lederman, N. G. International Journal of Science Education, 2007, 29, 1281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601140019
  49. Kang, S. H.; Woo, A. J. Inquiry General Chemistry Experiments; Bookshill: 2008.
  50. Lee, H.; Songer, N. B. International Journal of Science Education, 2003, 25, 923. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305023
  51. Ministry of Education, Science, and Curriculum, Notice No 2009-41, 2010.
  52. National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. A high School Framework for National Science Education Standards: Scope, Sequence, and Coordination of Secondary School Science; National Science Teachers Association: 2002.
  53. Lederman, N. G. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1992, 29, 331. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
  54. Han, Y. H.; Jeun, E. S.; Paik, S. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2014, 34, 349. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.4.0349
  55. Lederman, N. G. Nature of science: Past, Present and Future. In Handbook of Research on Science Education; Abell, S. K., Lederman, N. G. Eds.; 2007.
  56. Choi, J.; Seo, H.-A. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2012, 32, 879. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.5.879
  57. Woolnough, B. E. Physics Education, 2000, 35, 293. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/35/4/14
  58. Yoon, H. G.; Park, S. J. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2000, 20, 137.