DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluating the Effects of Dry Eye Syndrome on Ocular Fatigue and Attentiveness

건성안증후군의 눈 피로도와 주의집중력에 관한 연구

  • 홍경희 (대한안경사협회 중앙회) ;
  • 이현주 (대전보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김세진 (백석대학교 안경광학과)
  • Received : 2017.11.08
  • Accepted : 2017.12.11
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate the effects of dry eye syndrome on ocular fatigue and attentiveness. Methods: This study targeted 512 subjects who did not have an abnormal visual function, did not wear contact lens, had corrective eyesight over 0.8, and were between 19 and 83 year olds (mean age of 40.27 years). General characteristics (i.e., sex, age, drinking, and smoking status), dry eye syndrome, the score of a survey on ocular fatigue, and sub-factors of attentiveness were tested and analyzed. Results: Among the subjects, 312 were women and the mean age of them was 40.27 years. The number of drinkers was 260 and there were more drinkers than non-drinkers. There were 438 non-smokers, which was more than smokers. Dry eye syndrome showed positive correlations with age, sex, smoking, drinking, and eye fatigue. Attentiveness showed significant differences with BET, NAR, OET, and RED, which were sub-factors, had significant effects on dry eye syndrome. Conclusion: People with dry eye syndrome showed lower attentiveness than those who without it and higher dry eye syndrome increased ocular fatigue.

목적: 본 연구는 건성안 증후군이 눈 피로도와 주의집중력에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 한다. 방법: 시기능 이상이 없고 콘택트렌즈를 착용하지 않으며 양안 교정시력이 0.8 이상인 19 ~ 83세(평균 연령 40.27세)의 512명을 대상으로 하였다. 일반적인 특성(성별, 연령, 음주 및 흡연 여부), 건성안증후군, 눈 피로도 검사의 설문점수 및 주의집중력의 하위요인별로 검사하여 분석하였다. 결과: 대상자 중 여자가 312명(60.9%)으로 남자보다 많았고 평균 나이는 40.27세이었다. 음주를 하는 응답자가 260명(50.8%)으로 하지 않는 응답자보다 많았으며, 비흡연자가 438명(85.5%)으로 흡연자보다 많았다. 건성안증후군은 나이, 성별, 흡연, 음주, 눈 피로도와 정적상관을 나타냈으며, 주의집중력의 하위요인 BET, NAR, OET, RED에서 유의한 차이를 나타내었다. 결론: 건성안증후군은 그렇지 않은 사람보다 주의집중력이 낮았고, 건성안증후군이 증가하면 눈 피로도가 높아졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lemp MA: Report of the national eye institute/industry workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J. 21(4), 221-232, 1995.
  2. Definition, DEWS(2007): The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the definition and classification subcommittee of the international dry eye workShop(2007). Ocul Surf. 5(2), 75-92, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70081-2
  3. Park DU, Yoon CS: Suggestions to improve occupational hygiene activities based on the health problems of semiconductor workers. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg. 22(1), 1-8, 012.
  4. Hong KH, Kim YP et al.: A study on factors which affect dry eye syndrome and eye health in Filipino and Korean male students. Korean J Vis Sci. 19(1), 41-50, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17337/JMBI.2017.19.1.41
  5. Yun CM, Kang SY et al.: Prevalence of dry eye disease among university students. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 53(4), 505-509, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2012.53.4.505
  6. Definition, DEWS: The epidemiology of dry eye disease : report of the epidemiology subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop(2007). Ocular Surf. 5(2), 93-107, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70082-4
  7. Toda I, Fujishima H et al.: Ocular fatigue is the major symptom of dry eye. Acta Ophthlamol(Copenh). 71(3), 347-352, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1993.tb07146.x
  8. Yoo SY, Seo MW et al.: Analysis of eye fatigue and eye blink parameters in watching Ultra High Definition Video. Institute Electronics Engineers Korea 2016(6), 2269-2271, 2016.
  9. Kim SI, Park MJ et al.: Relationship between reading speed and blinking rate according to longitudinal chromatic aberration during book reading. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 20(3), 369-375, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2015.20.3.369
  10. Woo SH, Lee HJ: The effect of website background color on readability and eye-fatigue. J Korean Soc Design Sci. 21(3), 5-16, 2008.
  11. Park MS: Development of an attention concentration scale for middle school students. Kukje Theological University and Seminary PhD Thesis, pp.20-37, 2015.
  12. Yoon GH: Attention types of golfers by characteristics. Kyunghee University MS Thesis, pp.1-55, 2006.
  13. Duncan J, Humphreys GW: Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol Rev. 96(3), 433-458, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
  14. Ames SL, Wolffsohn JS et al.: The development of a symptom questionnaire for assessing virtual reality viewing using a head-mounted display. Optom Vis Sci. 82(3), 168-176, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OPX.0000156307.95086.6
  15. Kim MK: The effects of self-acupressure on th eye conditions of college students. Dong-Eui University MS Thesis, pp.1-30, 2012.
  16. Suh YW, Kim KH et al.: The objective methods to evaluate ocular fatigue associated with computer work. J Korean Opthalmol Soc. 51(10), 1327-1332, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2010.51.10.1327
  17. Oh DK: Comparison of McMonnies and Ocular Surface Disease Index Questionnaires for dry eye screening test. Eulji University MS Thesis. pp.5-66, 2013.
  18. Nideffer RM: Test of attentional and interpersonal style. J Pers Soc Psychol. 34(3), 394-404, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.394
  19. Vehof J, Kozareva D et al.: Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye disease in a british female cohort. Br J Ophthalmol. 98(12), 1712-1717, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305201
  20. Nowak MS, Smigielski J: The prevalence and risk factors for dry eye disease among older adults in the city of lodz, Poland. OJOph. 6(1), 1-5, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2016.61001
  21. Tan LL, Morgan P et al.: Prevalence of and risk factors for symptomatic dry eye disease in Singapore. Clin Exp Optom. 98(1), 45-53, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12210
  22. Jeong HS, Lim JS et al.: Prevalence and Risk Factors of Dry Eye Syndrome in the Incheon Area. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 52(10), 1135-1141, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2011.52.10.1135
  23. Her S, Kim KH: Dry eye syndrome and ocular fatigue according to the status of contact lens wearing and management among female university students. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 25(4), 259-269, 2014. https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2014.25.4.259