Korean Management Science Review (경영과학)

The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of BSC Adoption Effect by KOSPI listed Companies : Focus on Major Financial Ratios and Investment Scale

KOSPI 상장기업의 업종별 BSC 도입효과 분석 : 주요재무 비율 및 투자규모 중심으로

  • Kim, Ju Eun (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김주은 (경북대학교 경영학부 BK21 플러스사업단)
  • Received : 2017.07.20
  • Accepted : 2017.09.19
  • Published : 2017.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of the BSCs of 642 firms excluding the financial and insurance companies listed on KOSPI. The analysis of financial performance through analysis of major financial ratios between BSC and non-BSC firms is compared with the input of human and material resources for business growth. We will promote the spread of BSC and examine the areas differentiated performance improvement. The analytical categories are manufacturing, service, wholesale and retail, and information and communications, which are 2,136 business years out of 2,378 final analytical samples. The results of the analysis are as follows. As a result of the analysis, among the four industries analyzed, the industries that showed the best performance were manufacturing. In the case of service industry, growth and activity were lower than those of non-adoption (NA) companies, but the operating margin was significantly different from manufacturing. However, market value was higher than that of NA companies, and R&D expenditures and advertising expenses were significantly higher than NA firms. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in profitability between the BSC and NA firms, but the market value was very significant. EPS is 5.22 times, BPS is 5.64 times, PBR is 1.3 times, and EVA is 35 times higher. In addition, R&D expenditure and advertising expenditure are more than twice as high as those of NA. In the case of the service industry, there is no significant difference in the growth performance from the NA firms. Activity indicators, BSC introduced companies are three times lower than both the total assets turnover and the capital turnover rate. The operating profit margin was high at 45.8% for introduced companies and 37.2% for non-introduced companies. In market value analysis, only BPS was 1.68 times higher. On the other hand, investment in welfare expenses is 0.2% of total assets, which is relatively low compared to NA firms. However, research and development expenses and advertising expenses are 2.1% and 1.02% of total assets, respectively, but they are relatively lower than those of NA firms. Unlike the manufacturing and service industries, wholesale and retail trade was significantly higher than the NA firms in terms of sales growth and total assets growth rate. In terms of market value, EPS and BPS were significantly higher, but the benefits, R&D expenditures, and advertising expenses were lower than those of NA firms. The information and communication industry showed lower level of performance than the NA firms in all indicators except cash liquidity, BPS, and EVA.

Keywords

References

  1. 고성삼, 이창수, "중소제조기업의 균형성과표에 의한 경영성과측정", 중소기업연구, 제24권, 제4호(2002), pp.99-129.
  2. 구훈영, 민대기, "제조업종의 지역별 산업성장 및 고용효과 분석", 경영과학, 제34권, 제1호 (2017), pp.15-25. https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2017.34.1.015
  3. 김동환, "한국 유통업의 생산성 현황과 개선 과제", 한국유통학회 학술대회발표논문, 2004.
  4. 김범열, "균형잡힌 성과기록표(BSC)의 성공인 활용방안", LG주간경제, 2003, pp.25-29.
  5. 김원수, 윤종원, "SCM과 BSC도입유형이 성과 평가유형과 기업성과에 미치는 영향", 통합경영학술대회발표논문, 2005.
  6. 김진환, "BSC 실행요인들과 기업성과 간의 관계 : 의사소통, 전략적 정렬 그리고 협력의 역할", 회계저널, 제20권, 제1호(2011), pp.233-264.
  7. 김학준, 김창식, 서현, "AHP를 활용한 국내 골프 리조트 사업의 KPI대한 우선순위 및 가중치 개발", 관광․레저연구, 제23권, 제1호(2011), pp.395-408.
  8. 문보경, "전략경영도구로서의 균형성과관리 (Balanced Scorecard)", 우정정보, 제40권(2000), pp.31-54.
  9. 민재형, 이영찬, 정순여, "지식기반조직의 지식 근로자 성과평가에 관한 연구", 한국경영과학회지, 제25권, 제3호(2017), pp.137-154.
  10. 박찬정, 임규찬, "기업특성요인과 BSC 활용간의 관련성 분석 : 기업문화와 전략, 업종을 중심으로", 회계연구, 제11권 제2호(2006), pp.117-138.
  11. 방송통신위원회, 2016년 방송통신 분야 시장 전망 및 정책 방안 연구(방통융합정책연구 KCC- 2015-43) 2015.
  12. 배준철, 이상용, "혁신에서의 흡수역량과 IT : 제조업체와 서비스업체간 비교연구", 한국경영 정보학회 추계학술대회, (2010), pp.702-717.
  13. 손명호, 김재구, "기업전략에 따른 기업성과 평가지표의 가중치 비교연구 : 한국의 제조산업을 중심으로", 조직과 인사관리연구, 제27권, 제1 호(2003), pp.1-17.
  14. 오윤석, 정순여, "외식산업의 성과측정항목의 가중치 개발 : 국내 패밀리 레스토랑을 중심으로", 외식경영연구, 제7권, 제2호(2004), pp.125-145.
  15. 이상욱, 신준용, "BSC를 통한 지식자산 및 기업 가치 창출 : 국내 상장대기업의 BSC도입을 중심으로", 경영학연구, 제34권, 제2호(2006), pp.579- 607.
  16. 이상훈, 전재완, "서비스기업의 성과 측정을 위한 BSC의 효과성에 관한 실증적 연구", 서비스경영학회지, 제8권, 제1호(2007), pp.34-55.
  17. 이종곤, 허동욱, "균형성과표의 성과평가에 관한 실증적 연구", 산업경제연구, 제16권, 제5호 (2003), pp.195-210.
  18. 이충섭, 정양헌, 신건권, 김재열, "기업특성에 따른 관점별 균형성과정보의 사용정도 분석", 회계연구, 제12권, 제3호(2007), pp.33-56.
  19. 이학식, 김영, "재무성과와 기업가치에 대한 마케팅자산의 영향", 마케팅연구, 제15권, 제4호 (2000), pp.45-79.
  20. 이해신, "균형성과표의 비재무적측정치와 재무적 측정치간의 관련성에 관한 실증적 연구", 국제회계연구, 제9집(2003), pp.179-195.
  21. 장로, 김달곤, " 균형성과정보이용이 조직공정성을 통해 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 국제회계연구, 제58집(2014), pp.20-39.
  22. 장운길, 윤태화, "정부기관의 BSC 도입효과에 관한 실증연구 : 국세청을 중심으로", 회계연구, 제15권, 제1호(2010), pp.167-196.
  23. 전익진, 이학연, "BSC/DEA를 활용한 기업 연구 개발 프로젝트 성과평가", 경영과학, 제34권, 제2호(2017), pp.67-83. https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2017.34.2.067
  24. 정문종, "새로운 생산방식과 비재무성과 측정치의 활용과 가치", 회계저널, 제12권, 제3호(2003), pp.101-123.
  25. 조선배, "관광 서비스와 고객만족 : 호텔서비스를 중심으로", 한국호텔경영학회 추계학술발표논문, 1999.
  26. 최진화, "제조업의 정보화와 나아가야 할 방향", 한국공작기계학회지, 제15권, 제1호(2006), pp.8-12.
  27. 한국출판문화 산업진흥원, 2015년 하반기 KPIPA 출판산업동향, 2015.
  28. 허종락, 박무현, "BSC 성과지표간 인과관계 분석", 경영연구, 제19권, 제1호(2004), pp. 187-213.
  29. 홍철규, 손부영, "BSC도입의 자원배분 변경효과 및 기업 가치와의 관련성", 대한경영학회지, 제21권, 제3호(2008), pp.1211-1234.
  30. Banker, R.D., H. Chang, and M.J. Pizzini, "The Balanced Scorecard : Judgmental Effects of Performance Measures Linked to Strategy," The Accounting Review, Vol.79, No.1(2000), pp.1-23. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.1
  31. Bolton, R.N. and K.N. Lemon, "A Dynamic Model of Customers' Usage of Services : Usage as an Antecedent and Consequence of Satisfaction," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, No.2(1999), pp.171-183. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152091
  32. Davis, S. and T. Albright, "An Investigation of the Effect of Balanced Scorecard Implementation on Financial Performance," Management Accounting Research, Vol.15, (2004), pp.135-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2003.11.001
  33. Heskett, J.L., T.O. Jones, G.W. Loveman, W.E. Sasser, and L.A. Schlesinger, "Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work," Hardvard Business Review, Vol.72, No.2(1994), pp.164- 174.
  34. Hoque, Z. and W. James, "Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to Size and Market Factors : Impact on Organizational Performance," Journal of Management Accounting Review, Vol.12(2000), pp.1-17. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2000.12.1.1
  35. Ittner, C.D. and D.F. Larcker, "Are Nonfinancial Measures Leading Indicators of Financial Performance? An Analysis of Customer Satisfaction," Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.36, No.1(1998), pp.1-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491318
  36. Ittner, C.D., D.F. Larcker, and M.W. Meyer, "Subjectivity and the Weigh-ting of Performance Measures : Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard," The Accounting Review, Vol.78, No.3(2003), pp.725-758. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.725
  37. Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System," Harvard Business Review, January-February, (1996), pp.75-85.
  38. LaBarbera, P.A., D. Mazursky, "A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction : The Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive Process," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.20, No.4(1983), pp.393-404. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151443
  39. Lynch, L.M. and S.E. Black, "Beyond the Incidence of Employer-Provided Training," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.52, No.1(1998), p.64. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399805200104
  40. Malina, M.A., The Balanced Scorecard : An Empirical Test of Casual Relations, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, 2001.
  41. Smith, R.E., Explaining relative firm performance in the personal computer manufacturing industry : A balanced scorecard framework, ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, 2000.
  42. Tether, B. and C. Hipp, "Knowledge intensive, technical and other services : Patterns of competitiveness and innovation compared," Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol.14, No.2(2002), pp.163-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320220133848
  43. Venkatraman, G. and M. Gering, "The Balanced Scorecard," Ivey Business Journal, January/February(2000), pp.10-13.