References
- Castle J, Feinstein SB. Drug and gene delivery using sonoporation for cardiovascular disease. Ther Ultrasound. 2016;880:331-8.
- Mace E, Montaldo G, Cohen I, et al. Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain. Nat Methods. 2011;8(8):662-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1641
- Rrico CE, Pierre J, Pezet S, et al. Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging. Nature. 2015;527(7579):499-502. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16066
- Montilla LG, Olafsson R, Bauer DR, et al. Real-time photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging: a simple solution for clinical ultrasound systems with linear arrays. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(1):N1-12. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/1/N1
- Kang J, Kim EK, Kim GR, et al. Photoacoustic imaging of breast microcalcifications: a validation study with 3-dimensional ex vivo data and spectrophotometric measurement. J Biophotonics. 2015;8(1-2):71-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201300100
- Kang J, Chang JH, Wilson BC, et al. A prototype hand-held trimodal instrument for in vivo ultrasound, photoacoustic, and fluorescence imaging. Rev Sci Instrum. 2015;86(3):034901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915146
- Moon H, Kumar D, Kim H, et al. Amplified photoacoustic performance and enhanced photothermal stability of reduced graphene oxide coated gold nanorods for sensitive photo acoustic imaging. ACS Nano. 2015;9(3):2711-9. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn506516p
- Ju KY, Kang J, Pyo J, et al. pH-Induced aggregated melanin nanoparticles for photoacoustic signal amplification. Nanoscale. 2016;8(30):14448-56. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR02294D
- Lee J, Chang JH, Jeong JS, et al. Backscattering measurement from a single microdroplet. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011;58(4):874-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1882
- Hwang JY, Kim J, Park JM, et al. Cell deformation by singlebeam acoustic trapping: a promising tool for measurements of cell mechanics. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27238. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27238
- Yoon S, Kim MG, Chiu CT, et al. Direct and sustained intracellular delivery of exogenous molecules using acoustic-transfection with high frequency ultrasound. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20477. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20477
- Song JH, Yoo Y, Song TK, et al. Real-time monitoring of HIFU treatment using pulse inversion. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(15):5333-50. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/15/5333
- Kim H, Kang J, Chang JH. Thermal therapeutic method for selective treatment of deep-lying tissue by combining laser and high-intensity focused ultrasound energy. Opt Lett. 2014;39(9):2806-9. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.002806
- Ebbini ES, Ter Haar G. Ultrasound-guided therapeutic focused ultrasound: current status and future directions. Int J Hyperth. 2015;31(2):77-89. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2014.995238
- Feinstein SB. The evolution of contrast ultrasound from diagnosis to therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(21):2516-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.004
- Blomley MJK, Cooke JC, Unger EC, et al. Science, medicine, and the future-microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound. Br Med J. 2001;322(7296):1222-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1222
- Garg S, Thomas AA, Borden MA. The effect of lipid monolayer in-plane rigidity on in vivo microbubble circulation persistence. Biomaterials. 2013;34(28):6862-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.053
- Chen JL, Dhanaliwala AH, Dixon AJ, et al. Synthesis and characterization of transiently stable albumin-coated microbubbles via a flow-focusing microfluidic device. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40(2):400-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.09.024
- Song S, Guo HZ, Jiang ZQ, et al. Self-assembled microbubbles as contrast agents for ultrasound/magnetic resonance dualmodality imaging. Acta Biomater. 2015;24:266-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.025
- Grinstaff MW, Suslick KS. Air-filled proteinaceous microbubbles-synthesis of an echo-contrast agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88(17):7708-10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.17.7708
- Carroll BA, Turner RJ, Tickner EG, et al. Gelatin encapsulated nitrogen microbubbles as ultrasonic contrast agents. Invest Radiol. 1980;15(3):260-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198005000-00013
- Moon H, Yoon C, Lee TW, et al. Therapeutic ultrasound contrast agents for the enhancement of tumor diagnosis and tumor therapy. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;11(7):1183-92. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2015.2056
- Yang F, Li Y, Chen Z, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging. Biomaterials. 2009;30(23):3882-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.051
- Postema M, Van Wamel A, Lancee CT, et al. Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30(6):827-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.02.010
- Miller DL. Frequency relationships for ultrasonic activation of free microbubbles, encapsulated microbubbles, and gas-filled micropores. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104(4):2498-505. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423755
- Maresca G, Summaria V, Colagrande C, et al. New prospects for ultrasound contrast agents. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27:S171-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00059-X
- Schuh S, Chan K, Langer JC, et al. Properties of serial ultrasound clinical diagnostic pathway in suspected appendicitis and related computed tomography use. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(4):406-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12631
- Walton CB, Shohet RV. Tiny bubbles and endocytosis? Circ Res. 2009;104(5):563-5. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.195651
- Sirsi SR, Borden MA. Advances in ultrasound mediated gene therapy using microbubble contrast agents. Theranostics. 2012;2(12):1208-22. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.4306
- Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, et al. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2005;104(1):213-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.01.007
- Tsutsui JM, Xie F, Porter RT. The use of microbubbles to target drug delivery. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2004;2(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-2-1
- Unger EC, Porter T, Culp W, et al. Therapeutic applications of lipid-coated microbubbles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(9):1291-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2003.12.006
- Unger EC, Hersh E, Vannan M, et al. Local drug and gene delivery through microbubbles. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001;44(1):45-54. https://doi.org/10.1053/pcad.2001.26443
- Moon H, Kang J, Sim C, et al. Multifunctional theranostic contrast agent for photoacoustics- and ultrasound-based tumor diagnosis and ultrasound-stimulated local tumor therapy. J Control Release. 2015;218:63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.060
- Rawat M, Singh D, Saraf S, et al. Lipid carriers: A versatile delivery vehicle for proteins and peptides. Yakugaku Zasshi J Pharm Soc Jpn. 2008;128(2):269-80. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.128.269
- Hernot S, Klibanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(10):1153-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.005
- Cullen DM, Breidahl WH, Janes GC. Diagnostic accuracy of shoulder ultrasound performed by a single operator. Australas Radiol. 2007;51(3):226-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01685.x
- Fan Z, Kumon RE, Deng CX. Mechanisms of microbubblefacilitated sonoporation for drug and gene delivery. Ther Deliv. 2014;5(4):467-86. https://doi.org/10.4155/tde.14.10
- Borden MA, Kruse DE, Caskey CF, et al. Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005;52(11):1992-2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1561668
- Blomley MJ, Cooke JC, Unger EC, et al. Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound. BMJ. 2001;322(7296):1222-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1222
- Ferrara K, Pollard R, Borden M. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Biomed Eng. 2007;9:415-47.
- Klibanov AL. Preparation of targeted microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47(8):875-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-009-0498-0
- Ernst H, Hahn EG, Balzer T, et al. Color doppler ultrasound of liver lesions: signal enhancement after intravenous injection of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovist. J Clin Ultrasound. 1996;24(1):31-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199601)24:1<31::AID-JCU5>3.0.CO;2-M
-
Faez T, Goertz D, De Jong N. Characterization of
$definity^{TM}$ ultrasound contrast agent at frequency range of 5-15 MHz. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(2):338-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.11.014 - Li TL, Tachibana K, Kuroki M, et al. Gene transfer with echoenhanced contrast agents: comparison between Albunex, Optison, and Levovist in mice-initial results. Radiology. 2003;229(2):423-8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2292020500
- Watanabe R, Matsumura M, Chen CJ, et al. Characterization of tumor imaging with microbubble-based ultrasound contrast agent, Sonazoid, in rabbit liver (vol 28, pg 973, 2006). Biol Pharm Bull. 2006;29(12):2536.
- von Herbay A, Vogt C, Haussinger D. Late-phase pulse-inversion sonography using the contrast agent Levovist: differentiation between benign and malignant focal lesions of the liver. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(5):1273-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791273
- Schwarz KQ, Chen XC, Steinmetz S, et al. Harmonic imaging with Levovist. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997;10(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(97)80027-2
- Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, et al. Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(2):318-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.08.008
-
Ward M, Wu JR, Chiu JF. Experimental study of the effects of
$Optison^{(R)}$ concentration on sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26(7):1169-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00260-X - Lindner JR, Dayton PA, Coggins MP, et al. Noninvasive imaging of inflammation by ultrasound detection of phagocytosed microbubbles. Circulation. 2000;102(5):531-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.102.5.531
-
Sontum PC. Physicochemical characteristics of
$Sonazoid^{TM}$ , a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(5):824-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.11.006 - Appis AW, Tracy MJ, Feinstein SB. Update on the safety and efficacy of commercial ultrasound contrast agents in cardiac applications. Echo research and practice. 2015;2(2):R55-62. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-15-0018
-
Bokor D, Chambers JB, Rees PJ, et al. Clinical safety of
$SonoVue^{TM}$ , a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging, in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Invest Radiol. 2001;36(2):104-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200102000-00006 -
Morel DR, Schwieger I, Hohn L, et al. Human pharmacokinetics and safety evaluation of
$SonoVue^{TM}$ , a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging. Invest Radiol. 2000;35(1):80-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200001000-00009 -
Schneider M. Characteristics of
$SonoVue^{TM}$ . Echocardiogr J Cardiovas Ultrasound Allied Tech. 1999;16(7):743-6. -
Gorce JM, Arditi M, Schneider M. Influence of bubble size distribution on the echogenicity of ultrasound contrast agents-a study of
$SonoVue^{TM}$ . Invest Radiol. 2000;35(11):661-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200011000-00003 -
Datta S, Coussics CC, Ammi AY, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis using
$Definity^{(R)}$ as a cavitation nucleation agent. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(9):1421-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.01.016 - Miyamoto Y, Ito T, Takada E, et al. Efficacy of sonazoid (perflubutane) for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of focal breast lesions: phase 3 multicenter clinical trial. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(4):W400-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10518
- Raisinghani A, DeMaria AN. Physical principles of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(10A):3J-7J.
- Gramiak R, Shah PM, Kramer DH. Ultrasound cardiography: contrast studies in anatomy and function. Radiology. 1969;92(5):939-48. https://doi.org/10.1148/92.5.939
- Hoff L. Acoustic characterization of contrast agents for medical ultrasound imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
- Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, Eltoum IA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(12):2663-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9270(03)01699-X
- Defreitas R, Costa MV, Schneider SV, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound and clinical examination in the diagnosis of axillary lymph-node metastases in breast-cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1991;17(3):240-4.
- Villanueva FS, Wagner WR. Ultrasound molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med =. 2008;5:S26-32. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1246
- Desser TS, Jeffrey RB. Tissue harmonic imaging techniques: physical principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2001;22(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2171(01)90014-9
- Song J, Chang JH, Song TK, et al. Coded tissue harmonic imaging with nonlinear chirp signals. Ultrasonics. 2011;51(4):516-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2010.12.005
- Bouakaz A, Frigstad S, Ten Cate FJ, et al. Super harmonic imaging: a new imaging technique for improved contrast detection. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(1):59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00460-4
- Kono Y, Moriyasu F, Mine Y, et al. Gray-scale second harmonic imaging of the liver with galactose-based microbubbles. Invest Radiol. 1997;32(2):120-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199702000-00008
- Unger EC, Matsunaga TO, McCreery T, et al. Therapeutic applications of microbubbles. Eur J Radiol. 2002;42(2):160-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00455-7
- Church CC, Carstensen EL. "Stable" inertial cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27(10):1435-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00441-0
- Ohl CD, Wolfrum B. Detachment and sonoporation of adherent HeLa-cells by shock wave-induced cavitation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1624(1-3):131-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2003.10.005
- Lentacker I, De Cock I, Deckers R, et al. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:49-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.008
- Doinikov AA, Bouakaz A. Theoretical investigation of shear stress generated by a contrast microbubble on the cell membrane as a mechanism for sonoporation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;128(1):11-9. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3419775
- Fan Z, Kumon RE, Deng CX. Mechanisms of microbubblefacilitated sonoporation for drug and gene delivery. Ther Deliv. 2014;5(4):467-86. https://doi.org/10.4155/tde.14.10
- Zhao YZ, Luo YK, Lu CT, et al. Phospholipids-based microbubbles sonoporation pore size and reseal of cell membrane cultured in vitro. J Drug Target. 2008;16(1):18-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611860701637792
- Tsunoda S,Mazda O,Oda Y, et al. Sonoporation using microbubble BR14 promotes pDNA/siRNA transduction to murine heart. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;336(1):118-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.052
- Sirsi S, Borden M. Microbubble compositions, properties and biomedical applications. Bubble Sci Eng Technol. 2009;1(1-2):3-17. https://doi.org/10.1179/175889709X446507
- Kooiman K, Foppen-Harteveld M, van der Steen AFW, et al. Sonoporation of endothelial cells by vibrating targeted microbubbles. J Control Release. 2011;154(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.04.008
- Karshafian R, Samac S, Bevan PD, et al. Microbubble mediated sonoporation of cells in suspension: clonogenic viability and influence of molecular size on uptake. Ultrasonics. 2010;50(7):691-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2010.01.009
- Liao AH, Ho HC, Lin YC, et al. Effects of microbubble size on ultrasound-induced transdermal delivery of high-molecularweight drugs. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0138500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138500
- Cordon-Cardo C, O'Brien JP, Casals D, et al. Multidrug-resistance gene (P-glycoprotein) is expressed by endothelial cells at blood-brain barrier sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1989;86(2):695-8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.2.695
- Tung YS, Vlachos F, Feshitan JA, et al. The mechanism of interaction between focused ultrasound and microbubbles in blood-brain barrier opening in mice. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;130(5):3059-67. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3646905
- Yang FY, Fu WM, Chen WS, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the use of microbubbles with transcranial focused ultrasound on blood-brain-barrier disruption. Ultrason Sonochem. 2008;15(4):636-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.08.003
- Hynynen K, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Non-invasive opening of BBB by focused ultrasound. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;86:555-8.
- Samiotaki G, Karakatsani ME, Buch A, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis and drug delivery efficiency of the focused ultrasoundinduced blood-brain barrier opening in non-human primates. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;37:273-81.
- Cho H, Lee HY, Han M, et al. Localized down-regulation of P-glycoprotein by focused ultrasound and microbubbles induced blood-brain barrier disruption in rat brain. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31201. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31201
- Bai M, Shen M, Teng Y, et al. Enhanced therapeutic effect of Adriamycin on multidrug resistant breast cancer by the ABCG2-siRNA loaded polymeric nanoparticles assisted with ultrasound. OncoTarget. 2015;6:43779-90.
- Baron Toaldo M, Salvatore V, Marinelli S, et al. Use of VEGFR-2 targeted ultrasound contrast agent for the early evaluation of response to sorafenib in a mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17(1):29-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-014-0764-x
- Shen ZY, Xia GL, Wu MF, et al. The effects of percutaneous ethanol injection followed by 20-kHz ultrasound and microbubbles on rabbit hepatic tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142(2):373-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-2034-y
- Zhang Y, Chang R, Li M, et al. Docetaxel-loaded lipid microbubbles combined with ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction for targeted tumor therapy in MHCC-H cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:4763-71. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S102101
- Kotopoulis S, Delalande A, Popa M, et al. Sonoporation-enhanced chemotherapy significantly reduces primary tumour burden in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer xenograft. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16(1):53-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-013-0672-5
- Xing LX, Shi QS, Zheng KL, et al. Ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction (UMMD) facilitates the delivery of CA19-9 targeted and paclitaxel loaded mPEG-PLGA-PLL nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer. Theranostics. 2016;6(10):1573-87. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.15164
- Sorace AG, Saini R, Mahoney M, et al. Molecular ultrasound imaging using a targeted contrast agent for assessing early tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(10):1543-50. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.10.1543
- Staud F, Pavek P. Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37(4):720-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2004.11.004
- Schinkel AH, Jonker JW. Mammalian drug efflux transporters of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family: an overview. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55:3-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00169-2
- Adams H. Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke: 2005 guidelines update: a scientific statement from the stroke council of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association" (vol 36, pg 916, 2005). Stroke. 2006;37(6):1582. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000208523.66512.af
- Go AS. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association (vol 127, pg e6, 2013). Circulation. 2013;127(23):E841.
- Unger E, Porter T, Lindner J, et al. Cardiovascular drug delivery with ultrasound and microbubbles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:110-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.01.012
- Wang XW, Gkanatsas Y, Palasubramaniam J, et al. Thrombustargeted theranostic microbubbles: a new technology towards concurrent rapid ultrasound diagnosis and bleeding-free fibrinolytic treatment of thrombosis. Theranostics. 2016;6(5):726-38. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.14514
- Hagisawa K, Nishioka T, Suzuki R, et al. Thrombus-targeted perfluorocarbon-containing liposomal bubbles for enhancement of ultrasonic thrombolysis: invitro and invivo study. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(8):1565-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12321
- Schutt EG, Klein DH, Mattrey RM, et al. Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42(28):3218-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200200550
- Shekhar H, Rychak JJ, Doyley MM. Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging. Med Phys. 2013;40(8):082903. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4813017
- Feshitan JA, Chen CC, Kwan JJ, et al. Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;329(2):316-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.09.066
- Hettiarachchi K, Talu E, Longo ML, et al. On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging. Lab Chip. 2007;7(4):463-8. https://doi.org/10.1039/b701481n
- de Jong N, Bouakaz A, Frinking P. Basic acoustic properties of microbubbles. Echocardiography. 2002;19(3):229-40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8175.2002.00229.x
- Hannah A, Luke G, Wilson K, et al. Indocyanine green-loaded photoacoustic nanodroplets: dual contrast nanoconstructs for enhanced photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. ACS Nano. 2014;8(1):250-9. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn403527r
- Min KH, Min HS, Lee HJ, et al. pH-controlled gas-generating mineralized nanoparticles: a theranostic agent for ultrasound imaging and therapy of cancers. ACS Nano. 2015;9(1):134-45. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn506210a
- Tay LM, Xu C. Coating microbubbles with nanoparticles for medical imaging and drug delivery. Nanomedicine. 2017;12(2):91-4. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2016-0362
- Li J, Tian Y, Shan D, et al. Neuropeptide YY 1 receptor-mediated biodegradable photoluminescent nanobubbles as ultrasound contrast agents for targeted breast cancer imaging. Biomaterials. 2016;116:106-17.