Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of A Teaching-Learning Plan for Home Economics Education by Integrated Thematic Instruction(ITI) type

주제 중심 통합(ITI: Integrated Thematic Instruction)형 가정과 의생활영역 교수-학습 과정안 개발

  • Received : 2017.08.30
  • Accepted : 2017.09.25
  • Published : 2017.09.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

At present, the whole world is characterized by openness, cooperation and integration as a society with information and the world, and it requires creative talents for this. The competitiveness of the nation depends on the cultivation of creative talents. It demands anthropological value by improving the competitiveness of the nation through cultivating creative talents to share and care, not to cultivate creative talents for personal desires and accomplishments. The purpose of this study is to develop a teaching - learning process to develop integrated creative talents by applying the characteristics of integrated education curriculum at the base of the 2015 revised curriculum. To do this, we first extracted the content elements of the Clothing Life area of the revised curriculum from the 1st to 2015 and the contents of the Clothing Life area of the technology and home Economics textbooks to which the 2009 revision curriculum was applied. Five topics were extracted according to content selection criteria And The Theme of 'The selection and management of clothing' was selected. Researcher developed a integrated thematic instruction Home Economics Education Clothing Life teaching - learning process (hereinafter referred to as "the process") focused on the theme of 'selection and management of clothing'. The Process was composed of 5 basic classes [basic inquiry - content 1 - content 2 - depth study - application]. The process considers integration within the curriculum and interdepartmental integration, and aims to improve the personality, creativity, and problem solving ability of consideration and sharing in the course of the integrated class. In detail, the curriculum goals of the home Economics Education curriculum and ITI goals are presented separately in the curriculum developed for each process. At the stage of the class, the element of creativity and the element of personal education were exposed and applied to the class. In Korea, new curriculum has been revised and announced from time to time, making it difficult for the teacher to carry out the class in accordance with the paradigm of change. Home curriculum is closely related to real life, so it is an appropriate subject for an integrated subject. It has the educational significance of the subject in that it allows students to integrate the creative and personal elements that are limited in other subjects. ITI process will be helpful to teachers who need to implement the 2015 revised curriculum in which the theme-centered integrated home Economics education teaching-learning process is newly introduced. It is necessary to follow - up research to verify the effectiveness of how to improve students' problem - solving ability and cultivate creativity.

현재 전 세계는 정보화 세계화의 사회로 개방, 협력, 통합을 특징으로 하고 있으며, 이를 위한 창의적인 인재를 요구하고 있다. 국가의 경쟁력은 곧 창의적 인재 양성에 달려 있으며 개인적인 욕망과 성취를 위한 창의적 인재 양성이 아니라 나누고 배려하는 창의적 인재 양성을 통한 국가 경쟁력 향상으로 인류학적 가치를 요구하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 2015 개정 교육과정의 기저에 있는 문 이과 통합형 교육과정의 특징을 가정교과에 적용시켜 통합형 창의 인재를 육성하기 위한 교수-학습 과정안을 개발하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해서 우선, 1차에서 2015 개정 교육과정에서 제시된 의생활 영역의 내용 요소와 2009개정 교육과정이 적용된 기술 가정 교과서의 의생활 영역의 내용 요소를 추출한 후 전문가 집단이 내용선정 기준에 의해 5가지 주제를 추출하였다. 추출된 의생활 영역의 5가지 주제 중 '의복의 선택과 관리' 주제를 중심으로 주제 중심 통합형 가정과 의생활 교수-학습 과정안(이하 과정안)을 개발하였다. 과정안은 총 5차시 수업으로 [기초 탐구 - 내용 1 - 내용 2 - 심화탐구 - 적용]으로 구성하였다. 과정안은 교과 내 통합과 교과간 통합을 고려하였으며 통합형 수업의 진행 과정에서 배려와 나눔의 인성요소와 창의성, 문제 해결력 등을 향상시키고자 하였다. 세부적으로 실제 5차시 수업을 위해 개발한 교수-학습 과정안에 가정교과의 교과목표와 주제 중심 통합형 교육 목표를 분리하여 제시하였으며, 수업 진행단계에서 창의적 요소와 인성적인 교육 요소를 표면적으로 드러내어 수업에 적용하였다. 우리나라 교육은 새로운 교육과정이 수시로 개정 및 고시되고 있어 교사가 변화패러다임에 맞추어 수업을 실행하기가 어려웠다. 가정교과는 실제 생활과 밀접한 관련이 있어 통합형 주제로 수업을 하기에 적절한 교과이며 다른 교과에서 다루기에 한계가 있는 창의, 인성적 요소까지 학생들에게 통합적으로 교육할 수 있다는 점에서 교과의 교육적 의의를 가지고 있다. 본 연구의 주제 중심 통합형 가정과 의생활 교수-학습 과정안이 새롭게 도입되는 2015 개정 교육과정을 실시해야 하는 현장 교사들에게 도움이 되길 바라며, 나아가 이를 현장에 적용하여 학생들의 문제해결력 향상과 창의 융합형 인재양성에 얼마나 도움이 되는지에 대한 효과성을 검증하는 후속연구가 지속적으로 진행될 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha, S-R. (2009). Orientation of multicultural family home culture. Journal of Korean Family Resource Management, 13(3), 85-101.
  2. Daniel, Pink. (2012). A new future is coming. Seoul: Korea Economic Daily.
  3. Drake, S. M., Reveca, C. B., Park, Y-M. Translation. (2006). Integrated Curriculum. Seoul: One Mi-Sa.
  4. Gu, J-E & Chae, J-H. (2013). Development of convergent family and program based on smart education, Korean Home Economics Education Association 2012 Winter Conference, 115-116.
  5. Ingram, J. B. (1979). Curriculum integration and life long education: A contribution to the improvement of school curricula.
  6. Joo, S-U & Yoo, T-M. (2016). Curriculum design incorporating core concepts of home and education and three behavioral systems. Research in Practical Arts Education, 22(2), 123-141.
  7. Jung, J-H., Lee, S-J. & Yoo, T-M. (1998). A Analysis of the Relevance between Home Economics and Other Subjects in the Middle School. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 10(1), 77-93.
  8. Kim, K-J. (2010). A Study for the Meaning of Integrated Curriculum Used in the National Curriculum in Korea and Exploration of Reform Directions, Elementary Education Research, 23(2), 121-151.
  9. Kim, K-H. (2016). A Study on the Educational Content Construction about Happiness in 'Integrated Social Studies'. Journal of Moral ${\varepsilon}$ Ethics education, 42, 251-281.
  10. Kim, N-E & Lee, H-J. (2010). Developing and evaluating the curriculum for the curriculum of home curriculum by theme-centered integrated approach. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 22(3), 163-188
  11. Kim, N-E, Cho, J-S & Chae, J-H. (2016). Development of integrated teaching-learning process based on 'safety' theme for middle school home economics class. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 28(1), 19-39.
  12. Kim, S-S & Cho, J-S. (2014). The development and application of the thematic centered integrated teaching and learning process in the home curriculum - Focused on the elements of 'Living in the family' and 'Living in the family'. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 26(10), 1-16.
  13. Kim, S-H, Nam, D-S & Lee, T-W. (2012). The STEAM Learning Model Design Based on Smart Learning for Realization of the 21st Century Knowledge Powerhouse. Korea Computer Information Association Summer Conference, 20(2), 369-372.
  14. Lee, Y-D. (1983). Theory and Practice of Integrated Curriculum. Seoul: Education Science.
  15. Lee, E-H. (2014). Integrated Approach to Multicultural Education and Home Economics Education in the Cultural Diversity. Korean Education Problems Research, 32(3), 69-90.
  16. Lee, H-N, Son, D-Y, Kwon, H-S, Park, K-S, Han, I-K, Jung, H-I, Lee, S-S, Oh, H-J, Nam, J-C, Oh, Y-J, Pang, S-H & S대, B-H. (2012). Secondary Teachers' Perceptions and Needs Analysis on Integrative STEM Education. Journal of Korean Science Education, 32(1), 30-45.
  17. Mansilla, V. B., Miller, W. C., & Gardner, H. (2000). On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman, (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation. 17-38. New York: Teachers College Press.
  18. Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 curriculum revision.
  19. Min, K-B & Park, S-H. (2009). Appearance of Convergence Society and Change of Identity. Korean Culture Economy Society, Culture Economy Research, 12(2), 195-222.
  20. No, H-Y. (2017). Development and evaluation of pre-parent education program based on home curriculum for high school students. Unpublished master's thesis, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education Chung-Buk, Korea.
  21. Oh, H-S, Kim, H-J, Bae, H-J, Seo, D-I & Kim, H-S. (2012). What drives convergence?, Education Problem Research, 43, 51-82.
  22. Park, M-J. (2010). Convergence of Knowledge and Problems of Mind. Journal of Korean Philosophy, Educational Philosophy, 113, 73-110.
  23. Park, S-W. (2012). How Much Fusion: About theoretical possibilities and practical barriers. Hong Sung Wook (eds.). What is fusion.
  24. Schummer,. J. (2004). "Interdisciplinary issues in nanoscale research", Baird, D.,Nordmann, A., and Schummer, J.(Eds.) Discovering the nano-scale, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 9-20.
  25. Shin, M-S. (2010). A Study on the Development of Creative Personality Inventory for the Identification of the Gifted Elementary School Children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education Chung-Buk, Korea.
  26. Shin, S-M. (2015). Development and Application of STEAM Teaching.Learning Process Plan for the 'Environmental Friendly Clothing and Garment Recycling' unit in Technology.Home Economics Textbook. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education Chung-Buk, Korea.
  27. Willis, J., & Wright, K. E. (2000). A general set of procedures for constructivist instructional design: The new R2D2 model. Educational Technology, 40(2), 5-20.
  28. Yang, M-K. (2009). Critical Examination on the purposes and the methodological issues of interdisciplinary research, Open Education Research, 17(3), 51-72.
  29. Yoon, J-H. (2008). Development of integrated essay-type lesson in home and class. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education, 20(1), 21-44.
  30. Yoon, H-J, Yoon, W-J & Woo, A-J. (2011). High School Science Teachers' Perceptions of the 2009 Revised Science Curriculum and the Science Textbook, Subjective Education Research, 15(3), 757-776.