A Study on the Effect of Social Capital on Family Safety of One-Person and Single-Parent Households in Korea

가정안전에 대한 사회자본의 효과 분석: 1인가구와 한부모가구를 중심으로

  • Seo, Jiwon (Dept. of Human Ecology, Korea National Open University)
  • 서지원 (한국방송통신대학교 생활과학과)
  • Received : 2017.03.01
  • Accepted : 2017.05.17
  • Published : 2017.05.31

Abstract

Recently, concern about family safety is rising again as an important issue with the context of family healthiness and well-being in Korean society despite of the dramatic economic growth. The purpose of this study is to examine the status of family safety of singles and single-parent households and to investigate the effect of social capital on the level of their family safety. Data are from the 10th wave of Korea Welfare Panel Study analysing one-person households(N=2,017) and single-parent households(N=172). One-person households were categorized as three groups by age(the youths/middle-aged/the elderly) and single-parent households were also three by family types(mother-child/fahter-child/grandparent-child). The major results were as follows: First, the mean of family safety index was highest among middle-aged, while single youths had the fewest problems in terms of family safety. Second, social capital was found to vary by family structure. In the one-person households, all the levels of the social capital variables, including trust, bond, acceptance, and participation, differed significantly; only two variables, bond and embracement, differed in the single-parent households. Third, social capital differed between the low-income households and others significantly. Forth, the positive effects of social capital on overcoming family safety problems were investigated. In conclusion, social capital represents an alternative resource for overcoming economic hardship for low-income one-person/single-parent households, especially for middle-aged singles and father-child single-parent households. Based on these empirical results, theoretical implications were discussed with regard to family policy and programs.

Keywords

References

  1. 김현숙(2016). 한부모가정의 사회자본이 청소년의 자아탄력성을 매개로 학교적응에 미치는 영향: 한부모성별, 한부모기간, 교급에 따른 차이. 학교사회복지, 35, 275-302.
  2. 김혜영(2014). 유동하는 한국가족: 1인가구를 중심으로, 한국사회, 15(2), 255-292.
  3. 나영선. 이재열. 한준상. 이경묵. 한성안 (2005). 사회적 자본과 인적자원개발. 한국직업능력개발원.
  4. 노영주. 허정원. 서지원. 서선희(1999). '가정 복지' 개념을 중심으로 한 가정학의 재개념화. 한국가정관리학회지, 17(2), 1-11.
  5. 박경숙. 김미선(2016). 노인 가구형태의 변화가 노인 빈곤율 변화에 미친 영향. 한국사회학, 50(1), 221-253.
  6. 보건복지부(2016). www.mohw.go.kr.
  7. 서울특별시(2016). http://citybuild.seoul.go.kr.
  8. 서지원(2006). 사회자본으로서의 가족자원에 대한 이해와 활용방안. 한국가정관리학회지, 24(3), 1-14.
  9. 서지원(2013). 한부모가족 사회적 자원의 삶의 질에 대한 효과 분석. 한국가족자원경영학회지, 17(1), 103-124.
  10. 성영애(2013). 군집분석을 통해 살펴본 1인 가구의 연령대별 소비지출패턴. 소비자학연구, 24(3), 157-181.
  11. 여성가족부(2015). 2015년 한부모가족 실태조사. 여성가족부.
  12. 여성가족부(2016). www.mogef.go.kr.
  13. 임채원(2006). 신자유주의를 넘어 사회투자국가로. 파주 : 한울.
  14. 장지연(2012). 복지국가의 고용과 사회안전망. 노동리뷰, 34-44.
  15. 장후석(2016). 나눔의 경제학: 영미와 비교한 한국 나눔 문화의 7대 특징 및 시사점. 현대경제연구원 연구보고서.
  16. 정순희. 임은정(2014). 청년 1인 가구의 삶에 대한 연구. Financial Planning Review, 7(4), 1-19.
  17. 정태식 역(2016). 우리 아이들: 빈부격차는 어떻게 미래 세대를 파괴하는가, Putnam, D. R.(2016). Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis, 서울 : 페이퍼로드.
  18. 조희금. 김경신. 정민자. 송혜림. 이승미. 성미애. 이현아(2006). 건강가정론. 서울 : 신정.
  19. 중앙건강가정지원센터(2010). 가정건강성 평가도구 개발에 관한 연구.
  20. 최일섭(1999). 제3사회안전망과 지역사회복지. 한국지역사회복지학, 7, 7-21.
  21. 통계청(2016). e-나라지표(www.index.go.kr).
  22. 통계청(각년도). 사회조사.
  23. 보건복지부(2017). 통계로 보는 사회보장 2016.
  24. Bourdieu, P.(1986). The form of capital. In J. G. Ricahrdson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York : Greenwood Press.
  25. Coleman, J. S.(2000). Social capital in the creation of human capital. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital : A multifaceted perspective, 13- 39. Washington, D. C. : The International Bank for Reconstruction.
  26. Field, J.(2003). Social capital. London & New York : Routledge.
  27. Grootaert, C. & Basterleaer, T.(2001). Understanding and measuring social capital : A multidisciplinary tool for practitioners. Washington, D. C. : World Bank.
  28. Knack, S. & Keeper, P.(1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? : A crosscountry investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251-1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475
  29. Parcel, T. L. & Menaghan, E. G.(1994). Early parental work, family social capital, and early childhood outcomes. American Journal of Sociology, 99(4), 972-1009. https://doi.org/10.1086/230369
  30. Portes, A.(1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
  31. Putnam. R. D.(1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
  32. Whiteley, P. F.(2002). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48(3), 443-466.
  33. World Bank(2012). www.worldbank.org.