DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Examination of the Minimum Reinforcement Ratio for Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members

철근콘크리트 휨부재의 최소철근비에 대한 고찰

  • Choi, Seung-Won (Department of Civil and Construction, Chosun College of Science & Technology)
  • Received : 2017.06.01
  • Accepted : 2017.08.31
  • Published : 2017.11.01

Abstract

The minimum reinforcement ratio is an important design factor to prevent a brittle failure in RC flexural members. A minimum reinforcement ratio is presented by assuming an effective depth of cross-section and moment arm lever in CDC and KHBDC. In this study, it suggests that a rational method for minimum reinforcement ratio is calculated by material model and force equilibrium. As results, a minimum reinforcement ratio using a p-r curve in KHBDC is evaluated about 52~80% of recent design code's value and it induces an economical design. And also, a ductility capacity in case of placing this minimum reinforcement amount is evaluated about 89% of recent design code's value, but ductility in a member is 7 or more, so it has a sufficient ductility capacity. Therefore, it is judged that a minimum reinforcement ratio using p-r curve has a theoretical rationality, safety and economy in a flexural member design.

철근콘크리트 휨부재의 최소철근비는 부재의 취성 파괴를 방지하기 중요한 설계 인자이다. 콘크리트구조기준과 도로교설계기준에서 사용되는 최소철근비는 단면의 유효 깊이 및 모멘트 팔길이에 대한 가정을 통해 산정되었다. 따라서 이 연구에서는 재료 모델과 힘의 평형 관계를 통해 합리적으로 최소철근비를 산정할 수 있는 방법을 제안하였다. 연구 결과 도로교설계기준의 포물-사각형 곡선을 통해 산정된 최소 철근비는 현재 설계 기준에 의한 최소철근비의 약 52~80% 수준으로 산정되어 경제적인 설계가 가능한 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 재료 모델을 통한 최소철근량이 배치된 부재의 연성 능력은 현재 설계 기준에 의한 값의 약 89% 수준으로 평가되었으나, 부재의 연성도는 7 이상으로 충분한 연성능력을 보였다. 따라서 제안된 포물-사각형 곡선을 통한 최소철근비는 휨부재 설계의 이론적 합리성 뿐만 아니라 안전성 및 경제성을 확보할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. European Committee for Standardization (2002), Eurocode 2-Design of Concrete Structures, 120-121, 153.
  2. Kim, C. S. and Park, H. G. (2010), Longitudinal Reinforcement Ratio for Performance-based Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 22(2), 187-197(in Korean). https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2010.22.2.187
  3. Kim, W. (2015), Limit State Design of Concrete Structures, Dongwha publication, 265-266(in Korean).
  4. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2012), Concrete Design Code, 101-102(in Korean).
  5. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2012), Korea Highway Bridge Design Code(Limit state design), Korea, 5-12, 5-44, 5-72, 5-77, 5-78, 5-110(in Korean).
  6. Paik, I. Y., Shim, C. S., Chung, Y. S., and Sang, H. J. (2011), Statistical Properties of Material Strength of Concrete, Re-Bar and Strand Used in Domestic Construction Site, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 23(4), 421-430(in Korean). https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2011.23.4.421
  7. Park, S. J., Kang, T. S., and Moon, D. Y. (2014), A Study on the Flexural Minimum Reinforcement for Prevention of Brittle Failure Specified in KCI and EN Codes, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 26(2), 211-218(in Korean). https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2014.26.2.211