Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회 논문집)

Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Special Moment Steel Frames with Torsional Irregularities - II Improving Seismic Design Method

비틀림 비정형을 갖는 철골특수모멘트골조의 내진성능평가 - II 내진설계 방법개선

  • Han, Sang Whan (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Tae O (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2017.03.14
  • Accepted : 2017.08.31
  • Published : 2017.10.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper is the sequel of a companion paper (I. Seismic Design) for design and assessment of the torsional irregular structure using ASCE 7-10 criteria. This study evaluates the influence of torsional provisions on the performance of the designed steel moment frame with different eccentricity, taking the collapse probability as performance metric using the methodology in FEMA P695. The result show that torsional irregular structure designed according to ASCE 7-10 has an excessive seismic performance and the collapse strength is low as the eccentricity increases. To make the design reasonable, a new design approach is proposed in this study.

본 논문은 ASCE 7-10를 적용한 비틀림 비정형 철골 모멘트 골조의 설계 및 평가를 수행한 동반연구(I 내진설계)의 후속 연구이다. 본 연구에서는 철골 모멘트 골조의 비틀림 비정형 발생 여부와 ASCE 7-10 설계 요구조건의 적용 여부에 따라 내진성능평가를 수행하였다. 그 결과, ASCE 7-10의 비정형 내진설계 요구조건을 적용한 철골 모멘트 골조의 경우 붕괴확률이 매우 낮고 상당히 보수적인 설계 결과를 나타냈으며, 본 연구에서는 비틀림 비정형 구조물의 합리적인 설계를 위해 개선된 설계 방법을 제시하였다. 제안된 방법으로 설계된 비틀림 비정형 철골 모멘트 골조의 붕괴확률은 기존의 방법으로 설계된 구조물의 붕괴확률을 보다 크지만 ASCE 7-10의 붕괴확률 요구 조건을 만족하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. ASCE/SEI (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10, American Institite of Steel Construction, Reston.
  2. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (1991) Evaluation of Torsional Provisions in Seismic Codes, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.117, No.12, pp.3762-3782. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:12(3762)
  3. Tso, W.K. and Wong, C.M. (1993) An Evaluation of the New Zealand Code Torsional Provision, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol.26, No.2, pp.194-207.
  4. Harasimowicz, A.P. and Goel, R.K. (1998) Seismic Code Analysis of Multi-storey Asymmetric Buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.27, No.2, pp.173-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199802)27:2<173::AID-EQE724>3.0.CO;2-W
  5. Humar, J.L. and Kumar, P. (1999) Effect of Orthogonal Inplane Structural Elements on Inelastic Torsional Response, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, No.10, pp.1071-1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199910)28:10<1071::AID-EQE855>3.0.CO;2-V
  6. Jeong, S.H. and ELnashai, A.S. (2005) Analytical Assessment of an Irregular RC Frame for Full-scale 3D Pseudodynamic Testing Part I: Analytical Model Verification, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol.9, No.1, pp.95-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460509350535
  7. Herrera, R.G. and Soberon, C.G. (2008) Influence of Plan Irregularity of Buildings, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.
  8. Chandler, A.M. and Duan, X.N. (1997) Performance of Asymmetric Code-designed Buildings for Serviceability and Ultimate Limit States, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol.26, No.7, pp.717-735. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199707)26:7<717::AID-EQE672>3.0.CO;2-X
  9. Stathopoulos, K.G. and Anagnostopoulos, S.A. (2010) Accidental Desing Eccentricity: Is It Important for the Inelastic Response of Buildings to Strong Earthquakes, Soil Dynamics and Earthquqke Engineering, Vol.30, No.9, pp.782-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.12.018
  10. Reyes, J.C. and Quintero, O.A. (2014) Modal Pushover- Based Scaling of Earthquake Records for Nonlinear Analysis of Single-story Unsymmetric-plan Buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.43, No.7, pp.1005-1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2384
  11. De la Llera, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (1995) Estimation of Accidental Torsion Effects for Seismic Design of Building, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.121, No.1, pp.102-114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:1(102)
  12. Chang, H.Y., Lin, C.C.J., Lin, K.C., and Chen, J.U. (2009) Role of Accidental Torsion in Seismic Reliablity Assessment for Steel Building, Steel and Composite Structures, Vol.9, No.5, pp.457-471. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2009.9.5.457
  13. Debock, D.J., Liel, A.B., Haselton, C.B., Hooper, J.D., and Henige, R.A. (2014) Importance of Seismic Design Accidental Torsion Requirement for Building Collapse Capacity, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol.43, No.6, pp.831-850. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2375
  14. FEMA (2000) Quantification of Building Seismic Perfornance Factors. FEMA P695, Washington, DC.
  15. Han, S.W. and Chopra, A.K. (2006) Approximate Incremental Dynamic Analysis Using the Model Pushover Analysis Procedure, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol.35, No.15, pp.1853-1873. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.605
  16. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002) Seismic performance, capacity and reliability of structures as seen through incremental dynamic analysis, Rep. No.151, John A. Blume Earthquke Engineering Center, Stanford University.
  17. Baker, J.W. and Cornell, C.A. (2006) Spectral Shape, Epsilon and Record Selection, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.35, No.9, pp.1077-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.571
  18. Mazzoni, S., Mckenna, F., Scott, M.H., and Fenves, G.L. (2006) OpenSees command language manual, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center.