Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 39
  • /
  • Pages.3.1-3.9
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the effects on the pharyngeal airway space of maxillary protraction appliances according to the methods of anchorage

  • Seo, Won-Gyo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Han, Se-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2016.11.01
  • Accepted : 2017.01.04
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study is to compare the effects on the pharyngeal airway space of skeletal anchored face mask with those of tooth-borne facemask. Methods: We used two types of facemask for maxillary protraction, the tooth-borne facemask (TBFM) and the skeletal anchored facemask (SAFM), and evaluated the effects of each facemask on the pharyngeal airway. Twenty-eight patients (mean age 10.3 years) were treated with the TBFM and 24 patients (mean age 11.2 years) were treated with the SAFM. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2) to assess changes in the dimensions of the upper airway. Statistical analysis was performed with independent t tests, matched t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: There were marked increases in upper airway dimensions in both groups following treatment, but the SAFM group had a significantly greater increase in airway dimensions than the TBFM group. Also, the SAFM subgroups showed more improved airway measurements than the TBFM subgroups in both the superior and inferior pharyngeal airways. Conclusions: SAFM is more effective than TBFM in increasing upper airway dimensions.

Keywords

References

  1. Nanda R (1980) Biomechanical and clinical considerations of a modified protraction headgear. Am J Orthod 78:125-139 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90055-X
  2. Ellis E 3rd, McNamara JA Jr (1984) Components of adult class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:295-305 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90109-5
  3. Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG (1986) Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 56:7-30
  4. Haynes S. (1970) The prevalence of malocclusion in English children aged 11-12 years. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc 89-98
  5. Thilander B, Myrberg N (1973) The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Scand J Dent Res 81:12-21
  6. Ishii H, Morita S, Takeuchi Y, Nakamura S (1987) Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal class III cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92:304-312 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90331-3
  7. McNamara JA Jr (1987) An orthopedic approach to the treatment of class III malocclusion in young patients. J Clin Orthod 21:598-608
  8. Proffit WR (1993) Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis, Mosby-Year Book
  9. Nanda R (1978) Protraction of maxilla in rhesus monkeys by controlled extraoral forces. Am J Orthod 74:121-141 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90080-5
  10. Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Uckan S (2006) Orthopedic protraction with skeletal anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and hypodontia. Angle Orthod 76:156-163
  11. Zhou YH, Ding P, Lin Y, Qiu LX (2007) Facemask therapy with miniplate implant anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia. Chin Med J (Engl) 120:1372-1375
  12. Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO (2008) Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:440-449 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.011
  13. Sar C, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Uckan S, Yazici AC (2011) Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:636-649 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.039
  14. Koh SD, Chung DH (2014) Comparison of skeletal anchored facemask and tooth-borne facemask according to vertical skeletal pattern and growth stage. Angle Orthod 84:628-633 https://doi.org/10.2319/060313-421.1
  15. Sar C, Sahinoglu Z, Ozcirpici AA, Uckan S (2014) Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:41-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.09.009
  16. Hiyama S, Suda N, Ishii-Suzuki M, Tsuiki S, Ogawa M, Suzuki S et al (2002) Effects of maxillary protraction on craniofacial structures and upper-airway dimension. Angle Orthod 72:43-47
  17. Kaygisiz E, Tuncer BB, Yuksel S, Tuncer C, Yildiz C (2009) Effects of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy on the pharyngeal airway. Angle Orthod 79:660-667 https://doi.org/10.2319/072408-391.1
  18. Nguyen T, De Clerck H, Wilson M, Golden B (2015) Effect of class III bone anchor treatment on airway. Angle Orthod 85:591-596 https://doi.org/10.2319/041614-282.1
  19. Kambara T (1977) Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca irus. Am J Orthod 71:249-277 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90187-7
  20. Jackson GW, Kokich VG, Shapiro PA (1979) Experimental and postexperimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemestrina. Am J Orthod 75:318-333 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90278-1
  21. Kokich VG, Shapiro PA, Oswald R, Koskinen-Moffett L, Clarren SK (1985) Ankylosed teeth as abutments for maxillary protraction: a case report. Am J Orthod 88:303-307 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90129-0
  22. Singer SL, Henry PJ, Rosenberg I (2000) Osseointegrated implants as an adjunct to facemask therapy: a case report. Angle Orthod 70:253-262
  23. Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, Iplikcioglu H (2003) Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123:571-577 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00052-0
  24. Hong H, Ngan P, Han G, Qi LG, Wei SH (2005) Use of onplants as stable anchorage for facemask treatment: a case report. Angle Orthod 75:453-460
  25. De Clerck HJ, Cornelis MA, Cevidanes LH, Heymann GC, Tulloch CJ (2009) Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2123-2129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.007
  26. Mucedero M, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P (2009) Effects of maxillary protraction with or without expansion on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in class III subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 135:777-781 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.021
  27. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mucedero M, Cozza P (2010) Treatment and posttreatment effects of facemask therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in class III subjects. Eur J Orthod 32:346-350 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp092
  28. Riley RW, Powell NB (1990) Maxillofacial surgery and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 23:809-826
  29. Pracharktam N, Hans MG, Strohl KP, Redline S (1994) Upright and supine cephalometric evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and snoring subjects. Angle Orthod 64:63-73
  30. Handelman CS, Osborne G (1976) Growth of the nasopharynx and adenoid development from one to eighteeen years. Angle Orthod 46:243-259
  31. Linder-Aronson S, Leighton BC (1983) A longitudinal study of the development of the posterior nasopharyngeal wall between 3 and 16 years of age. Eur J Orthod 5:47-58 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/5.1.47
  32. Taylor M, Hans MG, Strohl KP, Nelson S, Broadbent BH (1996) Soft tissue growth of the oropharynx. Angle Orthod 66:393-400
  33. Preston CB, Tobias PV, Salem OH (2004) Skeletal age and growth of the nasopharynx in the sagittal plane: a cephalometric study. Semin Orthod 10:16-38 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2003.10.002
  34. Jeans WD, Fernando DC, Maw AR, Leighton BC (1981) A longitudinal study of the growth of the nasopharynx and its contents in normal children. Br J Radiol 54:117-121 https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-54-638-117
  35. Ozbek MM, Memikoglu TU, Gogen H, Lowe AA, Baspinar E (1998) Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal class II cases. Angle Orthod 68:327-336
  36. Gao X (2014) Pediatric sleep-disordered breathing and oral medicine. Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology 32:319-322
  37. Oktay H, Ulukaya E (2008) Maxillary protraction appliance effect on the size of the upper airway passage. Angle Orthod 78:209-214 https://doi.org/10.2319/122806-535.1
  38. Verse T, Pirsig W, Stuck BA, Hormann K, Maurer J (2003) Recent developments in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Med 2:157-168 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256646
  39. Conley RS (2011) Evidence for dental and dental specialty treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Part 1: the adult OSA patient and part 2: the paediatric and adolescent patient. J Oral Rehabil 38:136-156 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02136.x

Cited by

  1. Patterns of adenoid and tonsil growth in Japanese children and adolescents: A longitudinal study vol.8, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35272-z
  2. Determining the short‐term effects of different maxillary protraction methods on pharyngeal airway dimensions vol.24, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12471