Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

  • Volume 39
  • /
  • Pages.25.1-25.6
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2288-8101(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8586(eISSN)
Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Robot-assisted submandibular gland excision via modified facelift incision

  • Jung, Seung Wook (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Young Kwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cha, Yong Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry) ;
  • Koh, Yoon Woo (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University, College of Medicine) ;
  • Nam, Woong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2017.05.26
  • Accepted : 2017.07.12
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: The conventional transcervical resection for submandibular gland disease has some risks and an unsatisfactory cosmetic result. Recently, robot-assisted surgery has been developed as a plausible substitute for conventional surgery which provides an excellent cosmetic outcome. Case presentation: The authors performed robot-assisted sialadenectomy via modified facelift incision using the da Vinci Xi surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., CA, USA) with two endowrist arms (monopolar curved scissors and Maryland bipolar forceps) successfully in a 44-year-old female patient who suffered from sialolith and severe atrophic submandibular gland. Conclusions: If similar studies are done in the future, this robot-assisted sialadenectomy may become established as an alternative to existing disadvantageous surgical methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Mizrachi A, Bachar G, Unger Y et al (2017) Submandibular salivary gland tumors: clinical course and outcome of a 20-year multicenter study. Ear Nose Throat J 96:E17-E20
  2. Springborg LK, Moller MN (2013) Submandibular gland excision: long-term clinical outcome in 139 patients operated in a single institution. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:1441-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2175-4
  3. Hong KH, Kim YK (2000) Intraoral removal of the submandibular gland: a new surgical approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:798-802 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70004-0
  4. Miloro M (1999) Intraoral submandibular gland excision. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:661-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70005-3
  5. Guerrissi JO, Taborda G (2001) Endoscopic excision of the submandibular gland by an intraoral approach. J Craniofac Surg 12:299-303 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200105000-00018
  6. Parente Arias PL, Fernandez Fernandez MM, Varela Vazquez P, de Diego MB (2016) Minimally invasive video-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy: surgical technique and results from two institutions. Surg Endosc 30:3314-20 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4604-0
  7. Kim CH, Koh YW, Kim D, Chang JW, Choi EC, Shin YS (2013) Robotic-assisted neck dissection in submandibular gland cancer: preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:1450-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.02.007
  8. Lee HS, Park DY, Hwang CS et al (2013) Feasibility of robot-assisted submandibular gland resection via retroauricular approach: preliminary results. Laryngoscope 123:369-73 https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23321
  9. Koh YW, Choi EC (2014) Robotic approaches to the neck. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 47:433-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2014.02.002
  10. Koh YW, Chung WY, Hong HJ et al (2012) Robot-assisted selective neck dissection via modified face-lift approach for early oral tongue cancer: a video demonstration. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1334-5 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2155-8
  11. Kim JYKW, Choi EC, Nam W (2016) The role of virtual surgical planning in the era of robotic surgery. Yonsei Med J 57:265-8 https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.265
  12. Scott Magnuson EMG J, Kuppersmith RB (2016) Robotic Head and Neck Surgery. Thieme, New York
  13. Eun Chang Choi YWK (2013) Atlas of head and neck surgery-endoscopic and robotic neck surgery. Panmun, Seoul
  14. Terris DJTK, Fee WE Jr (1994) Modified facelift incision for parotidectomy. J Laryngol Otol 108:574-8
  15. Lohuis PJTM, Bonte K, van den Brekel MW, Balm AJ, Vermeersch HB (2009) Superficial parotidectomy via facelift incision. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118:276-80 https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940911800407
  16. Wasson JKH, Yeo J, Panesar J (2010) Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified facelift incision for parotid surgery: a patient feedback comparison. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:40-3
  17. Lee SYKY, Kim BG, Hong HJ, Jeong JH, Choi EC (2011) The extended indication of parotidectomy using the modified facelift incision in benign lesions: retrospective analysis of a single institution. World J Surg 35:2228-37 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1209-1
  18. Lorenz KJBP, Hocherl D, Wilde F (2013) Improving the quality of life of parotid surgery patients through a modified facelift incision and great auricular nerve preservation. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW 16:1-7
  19. Grover NDSA (2013) Facelift approach for parotidectomy: an evolving aesthetic technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148:548-56 https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812475221
  20. de Vicente JCG-GM, de Villalain L, Fernandez-Valle A (2015) Modified facelift approach combined with a superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap in the treatment of benign parotid tumors. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:1655-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.049
  21. Bulut OCPP, Federspil PA (2016) Modified facelift incision for partial parotidectomy versus bayonet-shaped incision: a comparison using visual analog scale. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:3269-75 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3878-0
  22. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS et al (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 23:2399-406 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0366-x
  23. Lee KE, Choi JY, Youn YK (2011) Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:230-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822d0455
  24. Richmon JD, Holsinger FC, Kandil E, Moore MW, Garcia JA, Tufano RP (2011) Transoral robotic-assisted thyroidectomy with central neck dissection: preclinical cadaver feasibility study and proposed surgical technique. J Robot Surg 5:279-82 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0287-2
  25. Byrd JK, Duvvuri U (2013) Current trends in robotic surgery for otolaryngology. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 1:153-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-013-0025-6
  26. Greer Albergotti W, Kenneth Byrd J, De Almeida JR, Kim S, Duvvuri U (2014) Robot-assisted level II-IV neck dissection through a modified facelift incision: initial North American experience. Int J Med Robot 10:391-6 https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1585
  27. Shin YS, Choi EC, Kim CH, Koh YW (2014) Robot-assisted selective neck dissection combined with facelift parotidectomy in parotid cancer. Head Neck 36:592-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23441
  28. Albergotti WG, Byrd JK, Nance M et al (2016) Robot-assisted neck dissection through a modified facelift incision. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 125:123-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489415601127
  29. Kim JY, Cho H, Cha IH, Nam W (2014) Esthetic neck dissection using an endoscope via retroauricular incision: a report of two cases. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:27-31 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.1.27

Cited by

  1. Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery of Submandibular Gland Removal With Preservation of Sublingual Gland and Wharton’s Duct vol.30, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004995
  2. Retroauricular endoscope-assisted versus conventional submandibular gland excision for benign and malignant tumors vol.34, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07173-3
  3. Trans-oral robotic surgery for Hilo-parenchymal submandibular stones vol.32, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otot.2021.10.005